Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
13
April 2019
Julian Assange – Information
Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
As a person respectful of law – I did
not use the information about Sri Lanka by Julian Assange. I classified it in
the group of ‘stolen cheques’. The pathway through which we receive is the natural
basis of the way we use/spend. One who receives through the structured pathway
would tend to use through the structured pathway. The question arises as to
whether as per my knowledge of the USA which listed the LTTE / Tamil Tigers as
a terrorist organization, the USA used the same footing with the Government of
Sri Lanka in terms of breaches of rules relating to war with an outsider. An
insider disciplines and an outsider punishes without sharing in the pain of the
punished. Given that Julian is Australian, I need to ask myself whether Julian
is morally wrong. I believe that my conscience based judgment would support Julian
through natural path of Truth. Every true Australian has this power to protect
Julian’s work. What action has the USA
taken to inquire into the allegations that Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa who as an American
citizen ordered the killing of Sri Lankans? Is it because it is acceptable to
the American government on de facto basis? If yes, does the American government
have the authority to take action against Julian Assange? If Julian is not
above the law – then neither is the
president of America.
Dr Binoy Kampmark of RMIT University reveals as follows through his
article ‘Shredding
Asylum: The Arrest of Julian Assange:
[President Donald Trump has been even more brazen on the subject of
Assange’s arrest, feigning
an attack of amnesia. “I know nothing about WikiLeaks.
It’s not my thing.” During the 2016 campaign, WikiLeaks had been very
much Trump’s “thing”, praised some 140 times for revealing email correspondence
from the Democratic National Committee. “Oh, we love WikiLeaks,” he
cheered at a North Carolina rally. No longer.]
In 2011,
when Admiral Thisara Samarasinghe assumed duties as Sri Lankan High Commissioner to Australia he
used the Terrorism label to describe the Tamil Tigers. When it was my turn to speak – I said that if
he did use that label – then he would not win the confidence of the Tamil
community. This is because only the Truth discovered in war mode needs to be
taken as energy into peace mode. That is the Hindu philosophy regarding
rebirth. We now have a Tamil with a business background as the high
commissioner. I concluded that my true contribution also went towards this. Truth
goes to the issue – with or without our medium. Our Truth informs us when we
feel ‘free and focused’ – as in meditation. We need to always be conscious of whom we
represent in official engagements. In the world of Truth we represent all those
who are true to themselves in that issue. The networking is done by divine
forces. Hence the power of intuition.
If Julian
was representing global journalists – then what he did was on de facto basis
given that war crimes were committed. Each
time a foreign government gets involved with foreign militants with whom they
do not share common faith, and the latter get defeated due to that ‘foreign’
force – war crimes are committed. Belief is the basis of natural law. Next best
is the law common to both sides. Usually there is a gap between the two. If
that gap is filled by common processes that both sides are able to follow – then it
is a just war and the outcomes would confirm good order.
The Sri
Lankan parallel of Julian is Daya Gamage who published inside information
through his book “Tamil Tigers’ Debt to America” – presented as follows by
Wikipedia:
[Tamil Tigers'
Debt to America: US Foreign Policy Adventurism & Sri Lanka's Dilemma is
a book written by Daya Gamage, a retired public affairs assistant and political
specialist of United States Department of State.
The book provides an analyses and interpretation of Washington's
covert and overt foreign policy adventurism on Sri Lanka and
practices that revived the country’s domestically annihilated military
organisation Tamil Tigers (LTTE)
in the global arena.
The
author, Daya Gamage was a public affairs assistant and political specialist
during the 1970-1994 at US diplomatic mission in Sri Lanka.
He won a Meritorious Honor Award for his
superior performance and professionalism in 1988 from the U.S. State
Department.[2]
Synopsis
The
book describes how Washington created a conducive ambience through its foreign
policy to make a respectable global recognition to the Tamil Diaspora, to bring Sri Lanka to
the UNHRC in Geneva and
possibly for war crimes at ICC in Hague, after its
disappointment in failure to salvage the leadership of Tamil Tigers, the
organization which was designated as a foreign
terrorist organization (FTO) by America itself under US Federal
laws, at the end of the Sri Lankan Civil War. Also it documents
about how then US Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton had used her authority to suspend IMF funding to Sri Lanka during the last
months of the armed conflict as a way of put pressure on the Rajapaksa
regime to halts its military offensive against Tamil Tigers to
facilitate Prabhakaran to leave the battle ground.]
The publishers state as follows about Mr Gamage:
[During
his professional engagement with the U.S. Department of State (1970-1994) in
the areas of public affairs and public diplomacy, Daya Gamage was privy to
Washington's play book of foreign policy dealings with Sri Lankan issues. He
gained extensive knowledge how U.S. Foreign Service Officers, and their
counterparts in Washington, made crucial decisions, influencing factors on
decisions, their mindset formation, and had access to their sensitive thinking.
This wide understanding became rich fodder to the extraordinary analyses and
interpretation of this book disclosing a link of that mindset formation to
Washington’s trajectory hauling Sri Lanka to Geneva. The author's research,
analyses, investigations and privileged conversations with American officials
who enjoyed high security clearances, and interactions with US Congressional
delegations - CODELs, vastly enriched his understanding the manner in which
Washington managed and conducted its overseas foreign policy agenda in South
Asia. The author was in a unique position to unlock his understanding of
American foreign policy trajectory toward Sri Lanka, hitherto unknown to
outsiders, to take the conversation toward a different direction and contribute
to the already existing rich literature on these issues. Daya Gamage earned a Meritorious Honor Award for Superior Performance
and Professionalism in 1988 from the U.S. State Department. He is currently
political-foreign affairs correspondent to the online daily newspaper Asian
Tribune.]
If as stated above, Daya Gamage was honoured by the
American government as ‘Superior Performer and Professional’ – then Julian
Assange also has earned that status for revealing ‘insider intelligence/information’.
At global level – the commonness basis needs to be high. Higher the commonness
stronger the assurance of Equal Opportunity. Confidentiality is needed to keep insider intelligence
within the family and v.v. A family works on barter system whereby each person
performs what s/he is best at and is needed by others in the family. Where one
lacks such skills – one needs to take junior position to the service providers.
A junior is not ‘free’ to reveal insider information to those outside the
family. That is the subjective hierarchy needed in family / institution. Mr
Gamage fails that test. Using that basis
– Julian was NOT insider to the USA. Hence he did not break any laws of
morality. He was just cleverer than those insiders in American government. It
is then an ego problem and no more.
The Australian government which is currently active
in Sri Lanka’s globalization, has the duty to protect the rights of Julian Assange at the
global level. If this government fails to do so – the investment made by
Australians in de facto relationships would be seriously devalued. Where there is
no global law to measure – one needs to seek and find a true parallel and use
that as the case law. That is when Australia would be blessed by Natural Forces
– especially to protect against alleged Terrorism acts by those who have no
knowledge of our laws and therefore act as per their own conscience in their
territory. Our home structure is our
natural authority.
If Americans punish Julian Assange – and Australia
remains silent we would import revenge attacks by those who were punished
unjustly by their governments. We may not win but getting involved helps us to
share our concerns about the excesses of Big Brother. Australians must live
their life as we structured it. If we do not take a stand and structure –
others will takeover and use our opportunities as theirs. Australians are not
orphans at global level.
As stated in India’s
National emblem – ‘Truth alone Triumphs’. Truth protects our access to Soul
Power. One who accesses such Soul Power is truly ‘free’.
No comments:
Post a Comment