30 April 2019
Follow your own Affidavit on the basis of the Big Fact Above
Dr Pakiasothy Saravanamuttu has raised the thinking of the reader through his article ‘Easter Sunday Savagery: The Unanswered Questions’ – published by Ground Views. The answers are there – from the actors themselves. The solution is from the believers.
1. (a) The cover – [Consequently a lot is riding on the committee appointed by the president to investigate as to how such a tragedy could have happened. Likewise, with the parliamentary committee that is proposed by MP Kiriella, for a similar purpose.]
(b) The Lead – [The most appalling aspect of the horror is the news that there were warnings of such attacks- pretty detailed too – and that the warnings were not communicated to those in power and authority to do something about them. This included the President, the Prime Minister and the Deputy Minister of Defence. Moreover, the Prime Minister has not been informed of National Security Council meetings since October 2018, although SLFP MPs have attended.]
(c ) My Affidavit based analysis : Let us look at this from family level. The President is the father and the PM is the mother. The eldest son (Buddhist Defence Secretary) learns about neighbourhood problem. His younger sisters (Christians and Muslims) have now become part of the neighbourhood (India and Middle East) and hence the problem did not seem important to the eldest son who knew already that his father did not care much about daughters and the mother was lame duck due to knowledge that the law is not respected by the father.
(d) The quick answer – The committees are to cover up the reality and show a good picture to the international community.
(e ) The solution – The law abiding mother to seek the help of her powerful mother (India) even though this may lead to demotion by Buddhist voters who do not care about Muslims fighting against Christians. That would release the mother from servitude to the dictates of the father and release her to enjoy global life in all its Equal Opportunity glory.
2. (a) The cover – [Equally disturbing is the reported allegation that the National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ), the local organization alleged to be responsible for the barbarism, is being funded from an account run by military intelligence which, is also used to fund the BBS. This is very serious and should be denied immediately, if not true.]
(b) The Lead –[ Is it the case that the warnings were disregarded out of sheer disbelief that anything of such a nature could happen in Sri Lanka? Were this to have been the case, is it also because of some collective relief and indeed belief that the scourge of terrorism was behind us, and that all was well on that front. We do know that moderate Muslim organizations had written to authorities about the National Thowheed Jamaath (NTJ) the organization that initially claimed responsibility for the attacks and its leader Mohamed Zahran, asking that both be banned on account of their activities including the defacing of Buddhist statues and the propagation of hate speech. There were demonstrations in Kattankudy to this effect as well. Some members involved in the Easter Sunday carnage had been arrested and released on the intervention of key politicians. Perhaps there is more in the way of lapses of the security services and in security procedures?]
(c ) My Affidavit based analysis : Dr Chandrasekaran one of those who appreciate my analytical writings included as follows my work in his article headed Myanmar Kyauphu Port - the dragon enters in a big way: -
[‘This reminds me of a well thought out remark by an analyst of Sri Lankan origin Gajalakshmi Paramasivam, in connection with the projects in Sri Lanka. She pointed out that “Borrowing without the ability to repay results in slavery. One who is a slave does not have the capacity to work sovereign powers anytime, anywhere!” ]
Borrowing from those without common religious interests (i.e. China) would dilute relationships with India, Middle East and the West – all of whom are relatives due to common faith. One needs to recognize this by paying our respects to them as seniors and not take equal position.
Yesterday the fodder was given by Tamils; today by Muslims and tomorrow it may be Christians – especially if their extended global relatives in the West are found fault with for ‘interfering’ through the UN.
(d) The quick answer- The Government eliminated Terrorism and did not cause it at all
(e ) The solution- All minorities to own their contribution to lawlessness including by confessions to the true leaders amongst them and invoke universal power of the soul by being true to themselves. This would lead to natural influence with Buddhists who seek to be relatives at equal level. That is the way of Truth. Non-Buddhists should not take junior or senior positions with Buddhists except through secular laws.
Dr Pakiasothy Saravanamuttu, like many educated Tamils in high positions – is not able to think outside the circle. This Affidavit trail will help him become independent of that status and therefore liberate him. Then he would influence the educated custodians of power to take disciplinary action against those who held the above meeting for which they have no lawful authority. If laws are not actively used by citizens – they become tools of abuse in the hands of cowards who desire power.