Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

15 April  2019

Is the Queen of England junior to the President of America?

The way we interpret what happens is as per our mind structure and the level of ownership in society. Julian Assange – an Australian by law, is being openly punished by the USA for leaking American intelligence. But so far the American Government has not initiated any action against Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa who by law is American citizen. Is it because they see Julian as a traitor but not Gotabhaya as an outsider? By law should they not use the same structure and therefore the same footing in dealing with both individuals – each as per their respective lawful structures? Did the UK Administration have the authority to deport Julian who by law is part of the Queen? Shouldn’t the UK authorities have deported him to Australia? Was that not our plea in the case of Bali 9 and on which basis Schapelle Corby was deported to Australia?

American safety relies on the Truth that is practiced in the land called America. It is that Truth that invokes greater protection that are often invisible. It is that Truth that renders us the true sovereign status. In the Watergate drama Deep throat was that invisible intelligence. Had FBI Agent taken status or money – the power to dismiss the President would not have had the Energy to travel that far. Deep Throat / Mr Mark Felt did not take any personal benefit through sharing intelligence with the young journalists. Hence his Truth traveled through reliable media – back to the People. That would happen where the power of the People is stronger than the power of the government. I had first experience of this here in Australia – where I genuinely fought to uphold my earned status than the hearsay status allocated to me by White Australians with little commitment to the law.

The Hindu pathways of carrying the Truth is presented as follows:

[Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless". …..The knowledge in the Vedas is believed in Hinduism to be eternal, uncreated, neither authored by human nor by divine source, but seen, heard and transmitted by sages. There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge)……

Vedas are also called śruti ("what is heard") literature, distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). The Veda, for orthodox Indian theologians, are considered revelations, some way or other the work of the Deity. In the Hindu Epic the Mahabharata, the creation of Vedas is credited to Brahma….The texts that appeared afterwards were called smriti. Smriti literature includes various Shastras and Itihasas (epics like Ramayana, Mahabharata), HarivamsaPuranas, Agamas and Darshanas.]

The parallel of Vedas is the principles of Self Governance / Soul. If Deep Throat heard the inner voice of Truth – the two reporters of Washington Post – Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein wrote the American Watergate epic. While Julian did not write an epic his work could be taken to have facilitated the sharing of truth that would empower people to protect their own sovereignty. To the extent the American establishment invested selfishly in Sri Lanka for example, it lost the moral authority to punish Julian Assange who became a citizen of cyberspace. Hence only a body such as the United Nations has the authority  to punish Julian. Beyond that it is each one’s karma which never fails.

To my mind, the fact that the Mueller investigations  into Russian interference in the 2016 American Presidential  elections is happening now – is no coincidence. Likewise Ms Yasmin Sooka’s actions against the alleged presidential candidate  in Sri Lanka – Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. If Mr Rajapaksa had valued American citizenship at equal level as Sri Lankan citizenship – he would have been protected by that commonness. But renouncing American citizenship to enjoy the status of president means – he is cheating the people of both nations. He cheated America when he applied for American citizenship which then makes his investment in Sri Lanka an invisible energy; He cheated Sri Lankans when he acted politically in Sri Lanka during the ethnic war. A dual citizen has the duty to take equal position in both nations.  By taking policy level position in Sri Lanka – Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa demoted Sri Lanka’s position at the international level.

Once my boss at Airlanka said at a Commercial meeting, that if a particular agent from Maldives could be our General Sales Agent – then I (Gajalakshmi) could be the President of Sri Lanka! Even though I was a little bit annoyed that my name was used – I appreciated the value that each one needs to be assessed as per the structure through which they present themselves. That is like the Watergate epic which is remembered largely by journalists and whistle-blowers whose identity with the core values of their organizations become their courage – to the extent their status is far lower than it ought to be relative to the leaders who enjoy high status. Since we do not have a government for cyberspace – Julian is entitled to be disciplined only by Australians. But both side politicians where are busy promoting their own agendas at the hearsay / seen level. If they had cared  they would have prevented the Queen being insulted by Americans.

Democratic Senator Joe Manchin  is reported to have told CNN [ Assange is “our property”]. Does that not make Australia a state of the USA?