Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
08
November 2018
Xenophobia manifested as Homophobia ?
This
morning I said to the father of one of my students in Thunaivi – Northern Sri
Lanka, that he needed to caution himself against development of Eustress. To my
mind, eustress develops when we imagine our abilities to be better than they
really are. In this instance, I had pulled up the son for being distracted in
my class. The son was adding his own words to the passage in the book and I
considered that to be due to his haste to ‘show’. I said to the son that he
could not similarly recall what he had
learnt in school, because he would have been distracted by thinking he knew
more than he actually did. After the class the father said to me that he had
noticed his son in school from time to time talking to the student next to him
while the class went on. I then said to the father – not to pull his son up on
the basis of my discovery – but to limit his disciplining to what he had
discovered. I explained to him that if he did – he would develop eustress. In
many ways even academics suffer from this when they get carried away with their
understanding of a topic and use knowledge without attributing to the person
from whom they learnt.
This
to my mind was the problem with president Sirisena when he used the term ‘butterflies’
to Mr Wickremesinghe’s group. The Island reports as follows:
[Co-Cabinet Spokesman
and Ports and Shipping Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe claimed yesterday that
President Mathiripala Sirisena’s claim that a ‘butterfly group’ had taken vital
decisions under the Ranil Wickremesinghe government, was not in reference to
the LGBT community.] – report headed ‘Govt.
claims President Sirisena did not refer to LGBT community
As stated previously – the Public are
free to interpret as per their belief – the outcomes manifested by public
institutions and individuals. Hence the need to have objectivity. The real
purpose is known through the core purpose. As per my knowledge of Sri Lanka,
the LGBT community are marginalized. In reality, even women who have married
more than once – are a disenfranchised group in Sri Lanka – and are often
insulted in courts by lawyers – without any
disciplinary action by the Judges. This is worse in Northern Sri Lanka where
some are claiming separation. If they are successful – one of the first casualties
would be the war-widows group.
Mr
Sirisena specifically stated ‘foreign interference’ as a reason for wanting to
remove Mr Wickremesinghe from the position of Prime Minister. This confirms
Xenophobia of the kind that Australia’s Ms Pauline Hanson demonstrated. Since I
had accumulated racial discrimination pain here in Australia, I was seriously
affected by this show of Xenophobia and I resigned from my position at the
University of NSW – specifically mentioning
Ms Hanson in my letter of resignation. I now realize that my Truth was leading
me from within. From then on – I started reading the whole through minorities
who suffered like I did – whatever the reason may be.
Like
my student mentioned above, Mr Kamer Nizamdeen was distracted by the cheap
status from New South Wales Police – during his early life at the University of
NSW – and hence to draw on the corporate wisdom about the immaturity of the
Academics who tend to live in their past. They thus infect the Police out of
fear of the foreign looking person. Unlike the ‘notebook’ evidence the NSW
Police had NO OBJECTIVELY MEASURABLE EVIDENCE of violence on my part – not even
when they dragged me to the Police wagon on 22 October 2004. The law clearly
said I was within my rights. Nizamdeen’s current position once he is back in
Sri Lanka is stated as follows:
[His lawyer, Farman Cassim, said that legal action will be taken to redress Nizamdeen’s grievances once his client’s costs’ application is taken up for hearing on 23 November. While praising the Australian judicial system for exonerating him, Nizamdeen criticised the conduct of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as “immature, unprofessional, embarrassing and biased”.
“I strongly believe this happened because I am an Asian on a student visa and the AFP, led by detective Darrine Eljarrar, had the wrong impression that I did not have the resources and the capability of defending my innocence,” he said. ]
Well, THAT is the
Truth – isn’t it? – That Nizamdeen was released by the Judiciary because of the
support he received from the Sri Lankan government in
which his uncle is a Minister? According to the above Detective Darrine Eljarrar’s mind was read by Nizamdeen and as per
the above, one could conclude that if AFP had known about Nizamdeen’s ‘resources’ he
would not have been arrested in the first instance.
As per the above
report:
[He also pledged to
speak up for other victims of injustice at every opportunity in the future …..Nizamdeen’s Attorney Farman Cassim
opined that Australia’s counterterrorism laws were even worse than Sri Lanka’s
Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and that there was a clear bias in the
implementation of the laws, as was evidenced in his client’s case.]
Well, if Nizamdeen is sincere – how about doing the easy work to influence his uncle – the Minister to release the political prisoners arrested and charged under the PTA? Will his uncle speak to the duly appointed Prime Minister – Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe or the one who came under the high class influence – Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa?
Well, if Nizamdeen is sincere – how about doing the easy work to influence his uncle – the Minister to release the political prisoners arrested and charged under the PTA? Will his uncle speak to the duly appointed Prime Minister – Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe or the one who came under the high class influence – Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa?
A foreigner that
Nizamdeen clearly was in Australia has to be assessed on Objective evidence
available to the system. If Nizamdeen wins in his compensation claim – I would
file a strong complaint not only with
our officials but also with the god within me. The alleged ‘impartial judiciary’
insisted on me filing with them a bank guarantee of $10,000 towards legal costs
and this was after they failed to settle the deal by offering me $10,000 for
withdrawing my complaint. I am not rich nor do I have influential relatives to
influence the Australian judiciary. In addition to the above bond, I paid the
University of NSW more than $10,000 - in
monthly instalments of $400 – to lift the caveat they had placed on my home unit.
All that is karma from
Xenophobia. I strongly recommend that Mr Nizamdeen uses his influence
internally with his Minister uncle to
prevent Xenophobia karma of his boss - from isolating the nation from the
global community.
No comments:
Post a Comment