Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
07 January 2021
ACCESSING
UNIVERSAL POWER
The
pandemic pushed many nations to close their borders to outsiders. This conveyed
the message that they were better able to manage the problem within sovereign
borders. In many nations including Australia, the individual States also closed
their borders.
One
could understand it through physical measures such as infection within a
family, so that the family could be isolated. At the deeper end – it is about
sharing Sovereign Energy which brings us the cure from the Universal Pool. The
essential requirement to access that pool is to be Sovereign – as an individual
and/or as a group. The way the Energy comes to us would vary but it would be
perfect.
Institutional
pathways help us to regulate this flow towards being sovereign. If we do less
than is our duty as per our position in an institution, we move away from that
sovereign power. When we do more – to meet the need of someone within the
institution – our passage towards commonness - is accelerated. When negligence
of duty is addressed within the current time by that institution, it does not
manifest as a problem. Otherwise it goes towards negative power and becomes a
sin. Sin is also a Universal power and can be balance only by another Universal
power. Unbalanced sin controls us.
It is to prevent this kind of negative control that
we have vertical hierarchy within family, work institution, community and
nation. As per Ceylon Today report ‘Tamil politicos to jointly voice concerns’ by Sulochana Ramiah Mohan :
[Several Tamil political parties agreed to unite to voice
on the minority issues including the Tamil national issue at the upcoming
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) session in Geneva in March 2021.
A joint meeting to discuss this is scheduled
for today (6) in Colombo, said General Secretary of Illankai Tamil Arasu
Kachchi (ITAK) Mavai Senathirajah who could not participate in the previously
held meeting.
The three MPs namely, Tamil National
Alliance’s (TNA) M.A. Sumanthiran, Thamil Makkal Thesiya Kuttani’s (TMTK) C.V.
Wigneswaran and Tamil National People’s Front’s (TNPF) Gajendra Kumar
Ponnambalam, agreed to table their concerns jointly to the UNHRC member
countries at the upcoming March secession.]
I
was happy to note the above move which is similar to the powers that Tamil Political
group had in 1977 and in 2015. Accordingly, where there is no firm commitment
from the Sri Lankan Government to prevent future ethnic wars in Sri Lanka,
Tamils would lead the prevention as alternate government. That is the way
Democracy works. Towards this minorities, however small they may seem, have to
be a sovereign group.
This
was demonstrated recently in the judgment in ‘Open
Society Justice Initiative et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al.’ by the honourable Katherine Polk
Failla United States District Judge who concluded as follows, in
allowing the matter to go to Oral Arguments:
[Finally, the Court must “balance the
competing claims of injury, consider the effect on each party of the granting
or withholding of the requested relief, and pay particular regard to the public
consequences in employing the extraordinary remedy of preliminary relief....
Plaintiffs argue that, given their likelihood of success on the merits of at
least their First Amendment claim, they should prevail because “[t]he
Government does not have an interest in the enforcement of an unconstitutional
law.” ….. Defendants respond that the balance of the equities and the public
interest weigh against a preliminary injunction because significant national
security and foreign policy interests are at stake and an injunction would
interfere with the President’s determination of how best to proceed…..
….The Court is
mindful of the Government’s interest in defending its foreign policy
prerogatives and maximizing the efficacy of its policy tools. Nevertheless,
“national-security concerns must not become a talisman used to ward off
inconvenient claims — a ‘label’ used to ‘cover a multitude of sins.’” Ziglar v.
Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843, 1862 (2017) (quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S.
511, 523 (1985)). For largely the same reasons discussed above in the analysis
of Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims, the Court concludes that the proffered
national security justification for seeking to prevent and potentially punish
Plaintiffs’ speech is inadequate to overcome Plaintiffs’ and the public’s
interest in the protection of First Amendment rights. See N.Y. Progress &
Prot. PAC, 733 F.3d at 488 (“[S]ecuring First Amendment rights is in the public
interest.”). Accordingly, the Court finds that the balance of equities tips in
Plaintiffs’ favor.]
These
are apparently small steps towards opposing injustice. But to the extent the
applicants presented their truth based belief – it would find its way to
Universal Power.
The
Tamil Political team has the fundamental authority to represent the victims in
Sri Lanka. To the extent it is bound by the experienced truth of the group
represented by it Tamils will be facilitated to access this Universal power. It
is essential that Diaspora Tamils submit or merge their Energies with this Sri
Lankan team and not ‘show’ themselves as separate claimants.
I
expressed this as follows to one who was concerned that he had been ‘dropped’
out of my list
[I assure you
that I have not removed you from my list. From time to time I do not send
some groups due to lack of response. I do not know whether you were in one of
those groups. But I find your name in the recent group with the UK PM at top. I
will include it in Mr Xxxxx’s lost also. I believe that when I genuinely share
– it adds value not only to the issue but also to the person or position
concerned. In the case of PMs the positions get empowered and I also access the
position power. I believe that that is how Universal power works.]
When we feel sovereign power in email communications
– we empower the issue by using email – in the belief that it is of positive
value.
No comments:
Post a Comment