Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
11
November 2019
BEWARE
OF NON-EXECUTIVE HEAD OF STATE
A senior member of the Australian Tamil community
said that we should ‘forgive and forget’. This was in response to our absence
at the wedding of a relative of ours –
known to the lady as an association. I then said that to me the ‘structure’ was
important and hence as an individual – I would confidentially accept the person
to the extent I felt he was true but that the apparent position in my relationship
was not mine alone to ‘forgive and forget’. The relationship is as per the
customs and laws of our common environment and confirms our contribution to
those structures. Damage to those structures would weaken our own protection
from negatives in family environment – where we tend to be ‘free’. By opposing
those who breach those protocols – we preserve our own protective armours.
This morning I learnt the shocking news that accused
in the Royal
Park Murder has been ‘pardoned’
by the current Sri Lankan President. Wikipedia includes the following message:
[On June 9, 2014 the Supreme Court approved the death
sentence.
Royal
Park murder convict on death row granted Presidential pardon (09-11-2019)
Nov
09 2019, Colombo: Sri Lanka President Maithripala Sirisena in the final week of
his term in office has pardoned a death row prisoner who was convicted of a
murder of a Swedish teenager in 2005, local media reported.
Sri
Lanka's Court of Appeal in 2012, overturning a 12 year prison term imposed by
the Colombo High Court, sentenced Shermantha Jude Jayamaha in the murder of
19-year-old Yvonne Jonsson at the luxurious Royal Park Condominiums at
Rajagiriya in July 2005
Recently,
President Maithripala Sirisena said he would consider granting presidential
pardon to Mr Jayamaha since he had served his term on good behavior while
completing his doctorate in prison. "He went to prison at the age of 19
over an incident of impatience," the President said announcing his
intention on the pardon request.
Chairman
of the Office on Missing Persons Saliya Peiris questioned how the President
chose Royal Park convict among thousands of convicts on death row to grant a
presidential pardon.]
The Constitution of Sri Lanka provides as follows:
[34. (1) The
President may in the case of any offender convicted of any offence in any court
within the Republic of Sri Lanka –
(a)
grant a pardon, either free or subject to lawful conditions;
(b)
grant any respite, either indefinite for such period as the President may think
fit, of the execution of any sentence passed on such offender ;
(c)
substitute a less severe form of punishment for any punishment imposed on such
offender ; or
(d)
remit the whole or any part of any punishment imposed or of any penalty or
forfeiture otherwise due to the Republic on account of such offence :
Provided
that where any offender shall have been condemned to suffer death by the
sentence of any court, the President shall cause a report to be made to him by
the Judge who tried the case and shall forward such report to the
Attorney-General with instructions that after the Attorney-General has advised
thereon, the report shall be sent together with the Attorney-General’s advice
to the Minister in charge of the subject of Justice, who shall forward the
report with his recommendation to the President. ]
It is not clear whether the President went through the
above process. If he did not – it is the duty of the Parliament – to institute
action to protect the ‘structure’ of the Constitution of Sri Lanka which
provides as follows:
[38 (2) (a)
Any Member of Parliament may, by a writing addressed to the Speaker, give
notice of a resolution alleging that the President is permanently incapable of
discharging the functions of his office by reason of mental or physical
infirmity or that the President has been guilty of –
(i)
intentional
violation of the Constitution,
…………………………….
(iv)
misconduct or corruption involving the abuse of the powers of his office, or
(v)
any offence under any law, involving
moral turpitude and setting out full particulars of the allegation or
allegations made and seeking an inquiry and report thereon by the Supreme Court]
In Democracy –
elected members of Parliament are entitled to act as per their belief. It is an
entitlement through their governing powers. If indeed – the President ‘believed’
that the perpetrator deserved his ‘pardon’ then Sri Lanka is headed by someone
of weak civilization. According to Adaderena newsreport:
[Last month, President Maithripala
Sirisena had said he may consider granting a Presidential pardon to the Royal
Park murder convict, as he had served his prison term on good behaviour while
completing his doctorate.]
Getting a doctorate
does not in any way cure a person of murderous qualities. In fact higher
education ought to have influenced the person concerned to apply the law and reject any concessions
personal to him.
The current President
has seriously weakened his relationship with the Common Citizen of Sri Lanka.
That is the heritage he shares with the position of Presidency. This kind of abuse was indicated also by Mr
Gotabaya Rajapakse. If Sri Lankans vote for Mr Rajapakse to become president –
they confirm that murder is not a serious misconduct. Given that the victim was
a dual-citizen with international grooming, this sends a strong warning to
tourists – especially from the Western countries where the laws are quite harsh
and where impeachment of the head of State is used to cure the government of serious impurities.
Mr Sirisena has acted
against the State by using personal / private standards. Whether it be Tamil, Sinhalese or
Muslim rebels who waged war in which people were killed – so long as they did
so due to their Belief – they earned lesser punishment than this perpetrator.
The release confirms ‘jungle’ laws and Sri Lanka’s President has demoted Sri
Lanka to jungle level. If majority have earned that – status – then they would
continue to elect such presidents.
Now that the Executive
powers of the President have been trimmed – one ought to expect this kind of
chaos in Sri Lanka. Presidential immunity is to cover ‘governing’ belief based
decisions which would not be acceptable to those who follow the law. The
President needs to be symbolic head to prevent this kind of abuse which places is
a curse placed on the Presidency and the whole nation.
When we hold a
position of belief – both sides of whatever we do come back to us. Executive
power and therefore Accountability – helps share the responsibility with those
above us by law.
No comments:
Post a Comment