Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
08
November 2019
TAMIL
NATIONAL ALLIANCE AND AUSTRALIAN GREENS
Yesterday a Tamil Diaspora leader drew my attention
to the Tamilwin report which included the statement of support to Mr Sajith
Premadasa in the forthcoming Presidential Election. This report is dated 06
November 2019. However, this was AFTER the article headed ‘Winning Elections In An
Ethnically & Religiously Polarised Polity’ – published a day earlier, by Mr Jehan Perera of the National Peace Council of Sri
Lanka in which he stated as follows:
[In arriving at their decision regarding which candidate
to support the TNA would have had two criteria to utilise. The first would be
to assess the past actions of the candidates who are most likely to win the
elections. The actions and thought frames of the past are likely to be
determinative of what happens in the future. The second would be to look at the
election campaigns of those leading candidates and their promises especially in
what matters to inter-ethnic relations.]
The TNA’s statement includes
the following:
This identity by Mr Jehan Perera confirms the strengthened share of Sri Lankan minds. Likewise, when Tamils and Muslims identify with common positive values. One who has it in her/himself will identify naturally with another. Many of us Tamils who feel Sri Lankan identified with Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe during the 2018 coup. THAT was a vote for UNP. TNA was part of the support but the true and voluntary support of an individual without any vested interests is absolute – the power that Gandhi had.
This identity by Mr Jehan Perera confirms the strengthened share of Sri Lankan minds. Likewise, when Tamils and Muslims identify with common positive values. One who has it in her/himself will identify naturally with another. Many of us Tamils who feel Sri Lankan identified with Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe during the 2018 coup. THAT was a vote for UNP. TNA was part of the support but the true and voluntary support of an individual without any vested interests is absolute – the power that Gandhi had.
Hence when my attention was drawn
to the Colombo Telegraph article headed ‘Former
Sri Lankan President’s Son Was Given Aegrotat Degree – LSE Admits Today’ I overrode it because of the conduct of Mr
Premadasa during the above crisis. But when I read the following this morning,
I felt concerned:
["As
soon as I'm appointed President, a new Prime Minister who commands the
confidence of Parliament will also be appointed. Sri Lanka will have a new
first-time Prime Minister who will be endorsed by the majority," ]
This indicates a mind
structure similar to that of Mr Sirisena. One does not ‘appoint’ a person
elected by the People. One recognizes – along the lines I have stated about Mr
Perera. My mind kept recalling the 2007 Australian Parliamentary elections in
which Mr John Howard lost his seat. When it happened - I put it down to my own
vote through the Equal Opportunity issues in which I challenged Mr Howard
through court process. I believe that this helped raise the value of my vote to
a much higher level and that through the system of truth it influenced
migrants. Wikipedia reports the reasoning of media analysts as follows:
[Media analysis of The
Australian Election Study, a postal survey of 1,873 voters during the 2007
poll, found that although respondents respected Howard and thought he had won
the 6-week election campaign, Howard was considered "at odds with public
opinion on cut-through issues", his opponent had achieved the highest
"likeability" rating in the survey's 20-year history, and a majority
had decided their voting intention before the election campaign]
Mr Howard’s opponent Ms Maxine McKew was a Journalist
who spoke the language of Common Australians.
One of the cut-through issues was refugee issue in which Mr Howard lied and
upset a good proportion of the Public who genuinely value investment in
globalization – as was recently confirmed by Australians living in Canada who supported
ex-Manus Island detainees. The votes of
those Australians were cast mentally during that issue – highlighted through
the Children Overboard declaration by Mr Howard. I have strong investment in the suburb of Epping through
extended family and more importantly my belief in Sathya Sai Baba – actively expressed
through the Carlingford Sai Centre – also in the electorate of Bennelong – named after Aboriginal elder - Woollarawarre Bennelong.
True belief
through any form unites the minds. The system of Truth delivers as per our own
needs. We need to identify with the Truth through our own environmental
challenges and the system of Dharma does the rest.
Thus the services through Sri Lankans of Sinhalese
origins to help Tamils come out of their depression will carry the Tamil
message through to Sinhalese voters who believe in those values in their own
forms.
Article 42(4) of the Sri Lankan Constitution
provides as follows:
[The President
shall appoint as Prime Minister the Member of Parliament, who, in the
President’s opinion, is most likely to command the confidence of Parliament.]
The test is also for the strength of the President’s
connection with the Parliament. If the President appoints a person he likes –
and the Parliament passes a no-confidence motion against such a person as Prime
Minister – the President loses credibility.
To my mind, Mr Premadasa weakened the confidence Tamils have in him
through the above declaration.
TNA for their part missed the opportunity to field
their own candidate to collect second
preferences. The value of Greens in Australian Political leadership is confirmed as follows :
[The final tally indicated that McKew defeated Howard
on the 14th count due to a large flow of Green preferences to her; 3,793 (78.84 percent) of Green
voters listed McKew as their second preference. Howard is the second
Australian prime minister, after Stanley Bruce, to lose his seat
in an election.] Wikipedia
In the above Statement - TNA has specifically
highlighted that it has the third highest seats in National Parliament. To
ignore TNA’s feelings and ‘appoint’ a PM of personal choice – is to risk Public demotion by the President of himself,
by himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment