Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam – 18 April 2015
Politician;
Administrator; Governor – Sri Lanka & Indonesia.
This morning I opened my friend’s email
first. I was intrigued by the subject
matter ‘Sri Lankan Airlines &
Weliamuna Report: Prosecution Of Negligent Auditors & Directors?’ by
Amrit Muttukumaru and published by Colombo Telegraph on 16 April 2015. In this
regard my article ‘Transparency or Victimization?’ was published on 08 April
2015. I was delighted to learn that my friend who is also a Chartered Accountant
- made the connection. This was the
first time I came across Mr. Amrit Muttukumaru’s name – leave alone as a
Guardian Angel of Good Governance. The identity I felt with the above article
was so very uplifting – a soul-experience. Bringing to surface this feeling – I
was able to identify with many common
values through which such experiences happen.. The Common description would be
selfless-service as the basis of such networks being formed Naturally. Most of
us do provide this service through many of our pathways. But only some of us
reach the final destination of Spiritual ownership. The above article led me to
other articles that helped me make the conscious connection between cause and
effect so as to be able to share with my current environment.
The
Karmic Connection
The Effect
I wrote in my article of 08 April:
‘through my Australian experiences –
especially with the University of New South Wales and the Federal Government –
I have registered the realization that to the extent I am true – I invoke the
other’s Truth during their Natural moment. Where the other person thinks I am
of low status – low enough to be a
number which is the parallel of untouchability in the hierarchical system – and
in real terms I am of equal or higher status than that person and I express
myself within those limits of my status – I invoke their Truth at a time when they
don’t like what I say / write and they think that they are immune from any
punishment by or through me. Hence my above comments about their Achilles Heel.
It’s the other side of Facebook and LinkedIn connections – except these are
natural and are therefore once manifested are beyond the direct control of both
sides. They have to go through the
system of Truth in the Court of Natural Justice / Conscience – for us to redeem
credits.’
The Cause
The above passage was invoked by Mr. Chandra Jayaratne
who first contacted me on behalf of the Friday Forum which claims to promote
Good Governance in Sri Lanka. Membership in this high status Forum renders one
high status including in her/his mind – influencing subjective power over those
who do not seem to have such high status.
After my deeper search on the basis of information in
the article by Mr. Muttukumaru – I was satisfied that Mr. Jayaratne was a
Public figure who did not himself hesitate to publicly question others. My
intuitive identification of this hypocrism in Mr. Jayaratne was confirmed
through the published work of Mr. Muttukumaru at : http://www.ft.lk/2011/05/14/amrit%E2%80%99s-open-to-letter-chandra/
After reading that article I was able to draw the
bigger picture – and was no longer driven
by only my intuitive feeling for my own purposes.
I was driven by my earned status as a professional. Mr. Muttukumaru states in
the above response to Mr. Chandra Jayaratne:
[You
need to be commended on your recent ‘Open Letter’ at the core of which is the
need for ‘good governance’ in which transparency and accountability are
crucial.
It has inter alia been copied to (i) Chairman, Ceylon
Chamber of Commerce (ii) Executive Director, Transparency International Sri
Lanka (iii) President, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (iv)
President, Organization of Professional Associations. It is noted that you are
director of TISL, a senior member of the ICASL and a member of ‘The Friday
Forum,’ which is said to have as its objective the promotion of ‘good
governance’. It has among its membership – Jayantha Dhanapala (Spokesperson),
Dr. A.C. Visvalingam and J.C. Weliamuna.
The last on the list – Mr J.C.Weliamuna is
the author of the recent Report about corruption in Sri Lankan Airlines. Now it
makes sense as to why Mr. Jayaratne would write at THIS POINT IN TIME in
response to THIS PARTICULAR ARTICLE in
which I reported as follows:
[If
the current Prime Minister had felt ownership in Sri Lankan Airlines – he would
have heard the alarm bells ringing as a shareholder representing the common Sri
Lankan in the National Carrier. For his part Mr. Weliamuna who is listed as
Chairman Transparency International Sri
Lanka, seems to have carried out a private investigative assignment for Mr.
Ranil Wickramasinghe. Sri Lankan Airlines Board of Directors together with its
Auditors have the responsibility to take appropriate action against both these
individuals on behalf of the institution/profession on the basis of defamation. Was the Government as a
shareholder – entitled to undertake such an investigation and report publicly
against a Limited Liability Company –
which lives as a separate entity to any of its shareholders? These are basics in Sovereignty which seem to
have been abandoned by the current government for political gains by impressing
voters cheaply. ]
I wrote also:
[My alarm
bells rang when the person who included Mr. Weliamuna in his email list wrote
to me as follows:
Dear
ms. Gajalakshmi Paramasivam,
I would
appreciate if you henceforth will kindly ensure that you do not circulate mail
to my entire circulation data base of e addresses received in error by you, as
it is spam mail to them, it is a definite act of disturbance of their due
privacy and considered unethical.
I
trust you will please oblige]
I was surprised and initially a bit upset
by this because I respected the person who included me in that group email
while circulating his work. I responded as follows:
[Thank
you Mr. …... I am indeed surprised that you consider my emails to be of
‘spam’ category. It is even more disappointing that you write on behalf of
others. You yourself have sent me public emails from time to time
and given this response I categorize you as an unfair person. Such a person is
not fit for public life. I will certainly remove this group from my address
list – because they did come through you. There are some who are in my
other lists and I would be happy to remove them from those lists if they
write directly to me.
Just a parting
observation – I find that from time to time email receivers react to particular
topics strongly and that seems to be their Achilles Heel. I conclude that yours
is the topic covered by this particular email
Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam]
The
Connection
Until today, I put it down to Mr. Jayaratne
not having much wisdom in Public Communication. Now I believe that he is also
part of the problem of weak governance in Sri Lanka. This includes using subjective assessment
where objective assessment is needed but is known to be disadvantageous to the
person with the higher power. This is a core reason that surfaces racial
discrimination to elevate the mind of the decision maker – as in sledging in
cricket. You reduce the status of the other side so they would defeat
themselves.
Mr.
Jayaratne did not think my articles were of ‘spam’ category. He used his high status in society – to give
that impression so the less independent reader would be distracted from my
criticism of his associate Mr. Weliamuna through his report on Sri Lankan Airlines.
Effectively therefore Mr. Jayaratne is
guilty of subjective discrimination if
his position status including with Friday Forum was made along similar paths of
reducing the other person’s status for the purpose of exerting authority. This
urge accumulates through everyday living – and if that included higher status
as a male, racial power to elect government etc. this would naturally manifest
where the opponent seems to be less powerful.
Subjective
Power
Simply stated: – in Autocracy
Subjective Power = Ownership + Time based
seniority
In Democracy
Subjective Power = Ownership + majority
vote
The above ‘spam’ ruling was wrong because the
common issue for the group was Democracy. No individual has the authority to
rule over another without the express authority of majority in the group.
Where one feels ownership without seniority
or majority power one tends to go it alone. Often such individuals tend to be strongly
independent. They would come out with high grades through either of the above
measures.
One who used Time based seniority without
ownership – would ‘assume’ majority power where others in the group do not take equal
position and openly exercise their votes to rule one way or the other.
Family
Values
Ownership in family – which is the common
hierarchical structure known to us – a Service Provider has subjective power
over a Service beneficiary. In highly developed cultures this flow of authority
is regulated through positions. When the junior feels respect for the senior –
the two become One – and produce only One outcome. It is on this basis that Sri
Lankan Government is referred to as Sri Lanka. This pathway is regulated
through ‘relationships’ – the absolute value is ‘family’ is common and the relative
value is through various positions.
Commonness
Without positions or commonness – we are
outsiders to each other – even if we are seen to be in the same family. With
commonness we are Family even if we are not seen together or do not know about
the existence of the other. It’s Universal power that connects us through the network
of Truth – which can only be experienced but not seen or known.
This Subjective seniority without ownership
- was at the core of my battles at the
University of New South Wales where I claimed that my Sri Lankan Chartered Accounting
qualifications were my highest qualifications. Only selfless investment could
develop this belief within any person. Today
I learnt this was also part of the reason why I felt intuitively that Mr.
Jayaratne was trying to reduce my status by calling my emails spam. Mr.
Jayaratne was assuming ‘Policy’ level status above me. Despite his ‘policy’
status he lacked insight into the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri
Lanka and the Profession itself. My insight is strong due to contributing more
than the likes of Mr. Jayaratne and his mates – and receiving much less than
they by way of benefits – money plus status. The system of Truth fills the gap
at the Universal level.
Chatham
House Rules
These ‘genes’ of secrecy seem to have
developed within Mr. Jayaratne due to the Management system in Sri Lanka being
an indiscriminate mix of the Hierarchical system of the former Sri Lankan
Government/s and the Lateral system of
Democracy which would bring fame to those who ‘show and tell’ – as Mr. Jayaratne’s
mate Mr. Weliamuna was doing.
The following response by Mr. Muttukumaru confirms
his identification of this weakness in Mr. Jayaratne:
[You propose a ‘series’ of ‘intellectual debates’ to be held ‘closed door’ under ‘Chatham House Rules’. While a case could possibly be made initially for ‘Chatham House Rules,’ how could the ‘closed door’ and ‘inviting selected leaders’ be justified?]
Chatham House Rules are based on NO
subjective identity by one about the other i.e. – no pointing of fingers at a
particular subject. Mr. Jayaratne was using the global path of Objectivity and
in practice he was following the Subjective path in the above matter and also
in relation to my email. A practitioner of Chatham House Rules would have
pointed to substance of my email communication as to the reason for
disciplining and/or dismissing me. In other words – ‘spam’ ought to have a
definition in the group and dismissal on the basis of spam ought to be
self-applicable in a professional group. If an email that a person in high position
dislikes qualifies as ‘spam’ – then the group is a political group and not a
professional group.
The hierarchy is: Politician; Administrator; Governor.
Administrator is the combination of Politician and Governor. Where Governor in
a person is stronger than the politician – that person is a Professional. At
the Governor level – there is only the Spirit of Ownership.
How
Racial Discrimination ‘Happens’
Even if my articles were without substance –
given that I am a Tamil and Mr. Jayaratne is a Sinhalese – the desire to use
subjective power ought to have been overridden – so there is no room for
subconscious racial discrimination – which is at the core of Sri Lanka’s war
genes. Where a party complains / expresses pain on the basis of damage against
another who has also claimed damage - both parties have equal right to express the
basis of any subjective power used – for example earned position, race, gender,
class etc. But where one side’s damage
is greater than that of the other – the belief as stated by that party with
greater damage is the right form of reason why the subjective discrimination
happened. It is therefore important to keep maintaining Equal status when one
thinks of the other as an outsider. This would have prevented the ethnic war in
Sri Lanka.
Genes
Talking about genes, a Tamil Diaspora
leader responded as follows today to my article ‘How Sri Lanka Became Hindu through the war’:
[Emperor Asoka, having won the
Kalinga war, renounced Hinduism and became a Buddhist, because he could not
bear any longer, the consequence of war and the murder and mayhem war causes,
in trying to build his empire. He became a follower of Buddha’s teaching and
sent his children to spread the Buddhist
message far and wide. Supposedly, Sanghamitta Emperor’s daughter visited Lanka.
Mahinda
Rajapaksa having won the war contrary to basic principles of Buddhism which is
the foremost religion in Sri Lanka. The Hindu god as a punishment to his crimes
has dethroned him from power, peacefully to do justice to the victims. Sinhala
leaders need to learn that only justice to all can bring peace and prosperity
to Sri Lanka, as Lee Kwan Yew achieved in Singapore. ]
My response to the above was:
[Emperor Asoka did not
have to renounce Hinduism to realise the value of non-violence. Hinduism
provides for it through many pathways – starting with Lord Shiva in meditation.
Interestingly – given that Emperor Asoka’s children spread Buddhism – including
in Ceylon – they would have taken the Warrior genes also with them. In
them these genes would have been dormant. In those who were like Emperor Asoka
before the Emperor changed over – Buddhism would have groomed the Warrior
character as well. Hence King Duttagemunu and President Mahinda Rajapaksa. It
was worse with SWRD Bandaranaike and JR Jayawardene who became Buddhists for
political purposes.
I
believe that when we contribute genuinely – it somehow reaches the genuine
seeker as well as the genuine needy. This one did – especially at this
point in time when the 19th Amendment is before the Parliament.
This particular section would not be repealed. But the Energy that has gone
into establishing that Article 9 does not belong in a democratic Constitution –
will translate as Equal Opportunity values for all Communities in Sri Lanka.
When we BELIEVE – the Lord facilitates. Given your investment in Sri Lankan
Government – I appreciate very much your value added through this article also.]
When Politicians who are also Professionals
let their cultural genes override their Professionalism
they go down to the low level of governance.
Indonesian
Connection
The current issue between Indonesia and
Australia is the Death Penalty for Drug Traffickers. To my simple mind - Drugs
kill the person’s brain cells and give them an immediate ‘high’. Meditation stills the brain at the highest
level of intelligence to free the soul from the influence of the body and the
brain. This is wholesome ‘bliss’ – the opportunity
to attain which is reduced when one takes pleasure drugs and kills the
opportunity to earn the pleasure. Only pleasure that has been earned uplifts
the experience towards blissful level. It’s like a true PhD in Education. Despite
having worked at the University of NSW, I am yet to come across a real PhD!
I believe that my Audit work at the
University - which resulted me in going to prison here in Australia - is now a
positive Energy which falls within the group ‘Knock and It shall open’. Hence
my articles questioning the ‘core
purpose’ driving the investigators of
Sri Lankan Airlines – in which Institution also I have ownership Energy.
In confirming the importance of allegiance to
the Core Purpose - Mr. Muttukumaru refers to
the Indonesian Connection through Audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) influencing Ernst & Young(E&Y) and the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka (ICASL) in relation to the privatization
of Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation
(SLIC):
The
professional misconduct of PwC and E&Y even being confirmed by the ‘Supreme
Court’ has not prodded the ICASL to fulfil its statutory obligations! The
‘Supreme Court’ in its landmark Judgment delivered on 4 June 2009, held the SLIC
privatisation to be “illegal and invalid ab initio” and had ordered the removal
“forthwith” of the auditors, Ernst & Young.
This violates with impunity Section 17 (2) (b) of its Act of incorporation which clearly stipulates that when an ‘Investigating Committee’ appointed by the ‘Council’ “reports to the Council that a prima facie case of professional misconduct has been made out against a member, the Council shall appoint a disciplinary committee for the purpose of inquiring into the conduct of such member”.
While PwC (Indonesia & Sri Lanka) functioned as Consultant, ‘Investment Banking and Legal Advisory Services’ to the Government of Sri Lanka, E&Y (Sri Lanka) were the ‘Auditors’ to SLIC and continued in this capacity even after the divestiture!
The SLIC divestiture is a ‘classic’ case of outrageous corruption at the centre of which are auditors. It inter alia demonstrates the ‘unholy’ nexus between key sections of the political, corporate, bureaucratic, professional and regulatory establishments of this country.
Impunity
A feature of the conduct of the ICASL is its apparent deception and impunity. This includes:
1)Sujeewa Mudalige being allowed to be the current President of the ICASL, notwithstanding that apart from being a Partner of PwC, he was a part of the Sri Lanka Team that comprised the PwC Indonesia Team that played a pivotal role in the fraudulent SLIC privatisation!
This violates with impunity Section 17 (2) (b) of its Act of incorporation which clearly stipulates that when an ‘Investigating Committee’ appointed by the ‘Council’ “reports to the Council that a prima facie case of professional misconduct has been made out against a member, the Council shall appoint a disciplinary committee for the purpose of inquiring into the conduct of such member”.
While PwC (Indonesia & Sri Lanka) functioned as Consultant, ‘Investment Banking and Legal Advisory Services’ to the Government of Sri Lanka, E&Y (Sri Lanka) were the ‘Auditors’ to SLIC and continued in this capacity even after the divestiture!
The SLIC divestiture is a ‘classic’ case of outrageous corruption at the centre of which are auditors. It inter alia demonstrates the ‘unholy’ nexus between key sections of the political, corporate, bureaucratic, professional and regulatory establishments of this country.
Impunity
A feature of the conduct of the ICASL is its apparent deception and impunity. This includes:
1)Sujeewa Mudalige being allowed to be the current President of the ICASL, notwithstanding that apart from being a Partner of PwC, he was a part of the Sri Lanka Team that comprised the PwC Indonesia Team that played a pivotal role in the fraudulent SLIC privatisation!
Mr. Nihal Sri Ameresekere another respected
Chartered Accountant reports:
Report
to Parliament on Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation Ltd:
Sale
of 90% shares of Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation (SLIC)
1. Steering Committee to
handle Sale of 90% of SLIC shares has been appointed on 21.1.2002 by the Hon
Minister Malinda Moragoda, without a Cabinet Approval.
2. Steering Committee has
appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) Indonesia in collaboration with PWC Sri
Lanka, without a cabinet approval, on 10.4.2002 as Consultant to the Government
for a fee of US $ 1.6 Mn
There are other mentions of similar nature
about Indonesian Auditors. The Auditors in Indonesia
seem to be as weak as the law enforcement authorities who collude naturally
with those carrying genes that develop corrution when the environment is not
firm in its law and order pathways. Like Mr. Muttukumaru and Mr. Nihal Ameresekere
those carrying the Good Governance genes would continue to be the protecting
angels of their respective professions
and nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment