The Value of our Vote
I received the sad news that Sinnarasu - a
member of our Local Community in Northern Sri Lanka suffered heart-attack while
working in the farm – using his tractor. I remember also the loss of my dear
uncle Visvanathan while working his farm similarly in Kilinochchi. Sinnarasu is
not part of our family and yet due to my work in Vattukottai area – I feel for
his family. As for Sinnarasu – he did not suffer due to old age.
With all this in my mind, I read Sri Lanka
Guardian article ‘Tamil
Vote: Is It 2005, Again?’ by Tissaranee Gunasekera. Ms Gunasekera states ‘The current situation of the North is both alarming and pathetic.
Poverty is extremely high – according to the Headcount Index, it is 28.8% in
Vanni, 12.7% in Killinochchi, 20.1% in Mannar and 8.3% in Jaffna. Only Vavuniya
at 3.4%, has a poverty-ratio lower than the national average of 6.7% .
Unemployment is high as well’
Given that the article is about the Tamil
vote and its influence in Presidential elections – it is more important
for us to be driven by how Tamils feel
about themselves. If the vote is the parallel of statistics, governance is the
parallel of ownership service. As per my
feelings as a Tamil – Vattukottai that suffered much due to the war is more
self-sufficient than it was in 2005. Hence I do not identify with the above
statistics.
Ms Gunasekera states also ‘The
Rajapaksas do not need Tamil votes to win. They just need Tamils to abstain
from voting. The Rajapaksas understood this in 2005. That is why they did a
deal with the LTTE to impose an election-boycott on Tamils’
I take the above as an accepted account of what
happened during the 2005 Presidential elections. I must say I was unhappy that Tamils were
suppressed by the LTTE from exercising their rights to vote. But as I
appreciate these days through a more mature mind – the LTTE’s vision did not
extend beyond armed win. If Ranil had
won Tamil unemployment would have been high under LTTE.
Even in 2005 – the LTTE knew that the Tamil People on their own would
vote for Peace. That would have meant loss of jobs for the LTTE. In 2010 Presidential elections – Tamil voters by
voting for General Sarath Fonseka confirmed that they did not hold the armed
forces responsible for the death of Tamils in 2009. The grievance was against
the Policies by the Government elected by majority race. The vote of Tamils in
the 2015 elections would confirm whether to the Tamil citizen – the situation
has improved since 2010 or whether it has gotten worse. Like with immigration,
irrespective of the form in which we
express ourselves – for most Tamils Colombo (therefore President / Government) is about employment / jobs.
As an individual, I believe that God’s
system has worked on many occasions to balance the equation for me as per my
own inner structures in relation to jobs.
Most Tamils of my generation prayed for particular outcomes especially
in terms of jobs. They did not think
that if they had the visible qualifications that was enough. There is of course
the known and seen efforts by us as individuals, the structures that supported
us to get to that place at that time and above all – the urge that motivated us
from within.
In early life – when I felt unjustly
treated by custodians of power – I absorbed that pain and carried on performing
as per my allocated position. Unlike LTTE I did not retaliate. This helped me
look beyond custodians of power for my own inner satisfaction. I relied heavily
on my belief in God to fill the gap. This helped me wait until I had reached my
peak – at the University of New South Wales – before producing my own returns
of karma – but without violating others’ work.
This was largely through Gandhi’s path of peaceful non-violent non-cooperation.
Hence whilst others accumulated more money wealth - I developed self-governance ownership in Australia
as well as in Sri Lanka.
The form of that God in my mind was as per
my family structures. Later, I added my own forms through my life as an
independent person. This continued in Australia where my Sri Lankan
qualifications were not recognized but my work was by those in need. But within
me I upheld the Sri Lankan structure that groomed me to be a Professional. Even
when I did basic bookkeeping work – my standards were those of a Chartered
Accountant. I thus upheld the investments in common structures by Sri Lankans
who recognized themselves as Sri Lankans. I do not know of any in my age group
who qualified as Professionals through Tamil only or Sinhala only structures.
This quiet acceptance of lower positions
but without compromising on the higher Sri Lankan standards, eventually led to
me finding opportunities without actively seeking. The last private sector
position with Lend Lease – a large successful organization here in Australia –
happened without me applying for any job there. The employment agent to whom I
had gone previous contacted me asking me whether I was available? Christians say ‘Knock and it shall open’. The knocking happened when I completed my
previous job to my satisfaction but was not facilitated to progress to the
higher level and therefore in my mind I was ready for the next job. To the deep investor – the knocking happens
in the mind – on the door of our own investments in higher opportunities through
our conduct.
Likewise in voting, those who have invested in governance would
invoke their powers by knocking automatically on their own doors of
opportunities – within themselves. True Buddhists would invoke such powers that
would help sustain Buddhist management structures in South and true Hindus
would invoke such powers that would help sustain Hindu management structures in
North. True Muslims and True Christians would be the common bridges that link
the two cultures – provided they believe they are Sri Lankan Muslims and Sri
Lankan Christians and not look beyond for support from areas where Muslims and
Christians are in majority. Minorities need to complete their experience with
what they have – so that they would be more open to recognizing the
contribution by their belief in God in filling the gap to produce outcomes of
standards equal any member of majority group. It’s the quality that confirms
the divine support from within.
Votes are about belief and how it works for
the individual. The level of self-governance is determined by the level of
belief in oneself. Any grouping to influence the mind at the last minute is a block
in this path between governance and voting – be it by the Common Candidate by
the Sinhalese Opposition or by the Tamil National Alliance who are the ruling
power in North and East. In terms of the Diaspora – their inner vote would
influence residents through their own belief that they are part of that community
– not because of the seen or even the
known but because of how they feel with the folks at the grassroots level. Those
members of the Diaspora who work for status benefits in their own circles would
not have this power because those voters at grassroots level in Sri Lanka are
not part of that circle through the
nucleus of Oneness. Every stroke of the work of a Diaspora member who feels for
the current voter as part of her/himself
would naturally influence the voter at ground level. The greater the
benefits we receive / take for our work – the less our investment in this
natural influencing power of belief.
Ms Gunasekera states ‘Ensuring a low voter-turnout in the North and the East will be a key
Rajapaksa aim.’
LTTE suppressed the freedom of Tamil voter and
elected Mr. Rajapaksa – effectively to kill them. In 2005 itself the Tamil
Community had enough evidence of the limits of the LTTE to lead Tamils. Whoever
suppresses the freedom of a Community which has lost much in its quest to
maintain its diversity – through belief based self-governance – is doing a
repeat of LTTE suppression. If this is TNA then they lose political power – as Mr.
John Howard did here in Australia by suppressing migrants from Asia – most of
it subconsciously due to lack of
investment in global communities. If it is the Diaspora – Tamil or
Sinhalese – then they would lose governance power in their own countries of
residence in their own respective circles where they are leaders. One who
promotes self-governance in others develops self-governance in her/himself.
Once realized self-governance would work any time anywhere to protect and guide
the person – like a guardian angel.
Gajalakshmi Paramasivam – 15 December 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment