Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY & THE
RAJAPAKSAS
Those in my immediate circles tend to identify positively
with the Queen or passionately criticise British rule to oppose us – the Public
heirs of the queen. Likewise, those in my Sri Lankan circle praised the Rajapaksa family after the war or
passionately criticised the approach by the Sri Lankan government, in ethnic war.
One example of the latter is headed ‘War-ravaged Sri Lankan Tamils suffer
amid economic crisis’ at https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2022/9/19/photos-war-ravaged-sri-lankan-tamils-suffer-amid-economic-crisis
[Under a blazing sun, a
44-year-old Tamil man tends his rented patch of peanut field in Sri Lanka, only
able to move around on his hands because an air raid in 2009 took both his legs
and injured his left arm….
….The 2009 air raid was during the last stages of a 26-year civil war
between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
(LTTE) group that fought for an independent Tamil state.]
Who is part of our government
and who is part of our Opposition? This is essential in finding the truth we
need.
In the case of British
Royalty, one Australian of Sri Lankan origin wrote:
[By the way
you say you wrote to your Queen too. Did you receive a reply. You are
tarnishing the image of Australia by your malicious posts and it cannot be
ignored by people who love Australia. Before crying for somebody's queen you
first respect the country that gave you refuge. Otherwise, if you are not
happy, as Pauline rightly said, go back to where you came from, provided
they are prepared to take you back]
As
per the above Australian’s expressions, his mind has been structured to
recognise himself as senior to me in Australia and hence he was, like Pauline
Hanson, telling me what to do. I responded as follows on the
basis of my belief in the Australian constitutional structure:
[I
wrote to the queen because she is also our queen. The response came from within
me. That is the power of the true Queen. It is like my mother coming to
me when I am in need. If you have had that kind of experience, you would
understand. According to you Australia has no queen. That is an unlawful
expression]
The
Tamil Pauline Hanson supporter wrote:
[Before
crying for somebody's queen you first respect the country that gave you refuge]
The
above, to my mind, is a Separatist claim.
It is highly likely that this structure is due to support for LTTE and /or
continued bashing of the Sri Lankan government, without belief in the issue. Mere knowledge
does not lead to belief. Mere Experience, unadulterated by external hearsay is guaranteed
to lead to belief.
Al
Jazeera reports that, ‘an air raid in 2009 took both his legs and injured his left arm’
One can work out his responsibility in ‘what happened’
to him only through his personal conscience. The parallel in the case of our
Queen is how the young lady had to take humungous responsibility for the whole
British Empire which rendered males the first right and duty to inherit the thrown/leadership.
Its democratic parallel is the Right to Governance by winning majority approval. Its Jaffna
Tamil parallel is Male inheriting from senior-male and female inheriting from senior-female.
In the case of British Royalty, this is presented as follows by Wikipedia:
[Male-preference primogeniture
accords succession to the throne to a female member of a dynasty if and only if she has no living brothers and no deceased
brothers who left surviving legitimate descendants.
A dynast's
sons and their lines of descent all come before that dynast's daughters and
their lines. Older sons and their lines come before younger sons and their
lines. Older daughters and their lines come before younger daughters and their
lines.]
To my mind, a believer in any system, would
invoke its powers through her/his belief as per her/his true need. All one has
to do is believe. The rest happens automatically, provided one does not weaken
one’s belief by due to desires.
I appreciated the power of this through
the Testamentary proceedings of my Brother in law – Mr Subramaiam Yoganathan of
Vaddukoddai. Mr Yoganathan passed away Intestate. My husband claimed Administrative
Rights on the basis of Thesawalamai law. At his request, I managed the matter in
the Courts of Northern Sri Lanka. Neither of us knew the details of the law. I studied it with faith, in the consciousness
of Jaffna culture of my times. The Courts ‘failed’ us and awarded equal share
which meant that daughters who received Dowry were double dipping.
Interestingly the decisions were delivered during the period Mr C V Wigneswaran
was Chief Minister. The parallel is to hold the Queen responsible, for what happened before Independence in
British territories such as India and Sri Lanka.
The above mentioned Tamil Pauline Hanson supporter, has thus far NOT said
one word of criticism against Mr
C V Wigneswaran but keeps blaming the queen for what happened during British
rule. There are many Tamils and Sinhalese like him.
In the High Court of Jaffna, Mr
Visvalingam Manivannan, represented us but failed to find fault with the Judgment,
which confirmed to me that he did not believe in Jaffna Tamil ancestry. He is now
Mayor of Jaffna and to me he carries no ancestral powers in his management of
Jaffna.
I therefore conclude that voters like these
Separatist-Tamils would bring to power, the likes of Pauline Hanson.
As for the Rajapaksas, they already have
become the Royal family of Sinhala Nation and need to retire from active
politics so the younger Sinhalese have the opportunity to uphold Sri Lanka’s
dignity as a Sovereign Nation. That is
the role of Mr Ranil Wickremesinghe about whom the following report was
published:
[It was
only some important people who had accompanied President Ranil
Wickremesinghe on his recent tour to Britain to attend the funeral of British
Monarch Queen Elizabeth II, a spokesperson from the President’s office
confirmed today.
According
to the spokesperson, only President Wickremesinghe, Ms. Wickremesinghe, a
special aide, three security personnel and the Director International Affairs
attached to the President’s office were in the tour party. “The Director
International Affairs had to join in the tour to organize media coverage in
Britain,” she said.
She was responding to comments made by MP Kumara
Welgama, who said the delegation which the President took to Britain was 'a
little high'.] Daily Mirror
The Parliament
has no direct right to question the Governing President, who like the queen,
represents Ancestral Powers.
No comments:
Post a Comment