Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

27 June 2017                     

Christians Foremost?

My eyes were drawn to the Sri Lankan news by the Australian, under the heading  ‘Sri Lankan boatpeople sent home’.  While reading that report, my eyes were drawn to the more interesting heading by Sydney Journalist Sam Buckingham-Jones – ‘Christians granted 60pc of humanitarian visas’.

I was satisfied that I was able to identify with the connection that  the system of Natural Justice was  showing. Sri Lanka’s majority race,  through the  Constitution has instructed that  ‘Buddhism would be foremost’. A Constitution is Democratic only when it is written to apply equally to all who are bound by it. That Constitution as it is currently worded – reflects the Truth that Sri Lanka is not a democracy but autocracy.

Here in Australia, we do not have any more – the White Australia Policy expressly stated in our Constitution. But those who continue to ‘enforce’ their habits on others tend to ‘invoke’ such ‘protection’ from time to time and rightly so – especially for migrants who rely heavily on financial returns for their investments in fellow Australians.

The recent conflict in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province Governance highlighted the need for connection with wider world if we are to ‘prevent’ internal conflicts between Natives and Migrants. This is also the conflict between Belief based Natural Governance and Intellectually driven Harmonious Government. The two are often enjoyed through different pathways.

The Indigenous Australians who continue to stay within their Beliefs would not have developed the Australia that migrants are attracted to. Within the Tamil community – majority militants are/were the parallels of Indigenous Australians. If any of their descendants / followers are included in the above group that has been ‘sent’ home, it is the DUTY of the Sri Lankan Government to itself to ensure their comfortable settlement in their home-areas.  Otherwise Sri Lanka would be importing the disappointments that these folks carry in their minds which is likely to manifest with compounded interest if there is another war in Sri Lanka which involves their community.

The Conflict here in Australian mind is whether we qualify to call ourselves self-governing when we continue to ‘show’ Christian values above Common values when dealing with secular issues. During my participation in a Court hearing on the basis of Racial Discrimination Act 1975, Justice Gyles asked me towards the end of the hearing whether according to me the alleged racial discrimination was Conscious or Subconscious? I said ‘subconscious’. Then Dr. John Griffiths (not sure if he is the one who later became the judge of the Federal Court) who represented the other side jumped up and stated words to the effect that his client was young and her career would be adversely affected by a ruling against her. When judgment was delivered to ‘dismiss’ me – I went to St Mary’s Cathedral nearby and cried.  The more I got to know the Australian Judiciary – the more disappointed I became. I was also able to better appreciate the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in a White man’s world even when they express themselves through the White man’s rules.

Strictly speaking, one who follows the White Man’s rules must reach the destination of being ‘Right’ to that White Man. I intellectually followed the White Man’s rules to present my experience and was marked Wrong. But what did surface was the Truth that the White man is ‘foreigner’ to Global Law. That was the real value for the costs I paid through my legal actions. This helped me ‘demote’ the status of those pretenders to the level of the litigants they wrongly judged – in this instance – myself – as allocated by them and mentally I take their position to identify with the validity of the structure that we are both part of – to experience  harmony in my mind. For their part those judges and the lawyers who influence them – would ‘hoard’ their ‘rights’ once they get to the highest position available in their own special environment. Mr. Jerome Doraisamy whose surname indicates some commonness with my ethnicity states:

[86 per cent of professionals would rather suffer in silence than disclose a mental health condition out of fear of being fired or passed over for promotion.]
The need for the above disclosure is confirmed from within the Legal profession:
[In a testimonial, barrister, human rights and refugee advocate, Julian Burnside, says depression has been his own constant (but unwelcome) companion in life.
His only regret in seeing this book is that he did not see it earlier. Burnside highlights the dissonance between the idealism that attracts many to law school and the reality of big law firms. "Many, including the brightest and the best, see their earlier ideals looking more na├»ve, more unachievable."] - Young lawyer outs depression that is endemic in legal profession – published by Financial Review

When we feel depressed in a particular environment – after getting high grades in that environment – we know that we are in the wrong environment for us. If we continued to endure the suffering due to our belief based expectations, to that extent all those who marked us ‘right’ would be infected by our suffering. Hence the need for Equal Opposition where we are ‘free’ to express ourselves.
When we Believe, that confirms to us that we have completed our experience at that level. To the extent – this is upheld by those who hold positions above us – they are our elders in the hierarchical system or our equal partners in the lateral system of  Democracy.  From then onwards we are self-governing. Often it becomes necessary to have some degree of separation to appreciate this about ourselves.

The place where we completed the experience becomes our home. Those who marked us wrong – are juniors in this home-structure and those who dismiss us – become ‘foreigners’ / ‘outsiders’ to that home that we developed with Truth as the presiding Power.
Christian driven decisions to offset Islamic extremism makes those leaders ‘outsiders’ to Common Australia. They are not entitled to give speeches about Australian Values. The way I take my place as Australian Tamil, now that I use more Tamil Values based structures – they have to take their place as Australian Christians.

As per the above report by Mr. Sam Buckingham-Jones :
[At St Mark’s Coptic Church in Arncliffe yesterday, the Sydney diocese’s Bishop Daniel yesterday reminded Mr Turnbull the Copts in Egypt had “been victim to some of the most horrific form of persecution” and the target of attacks by Islamic State-aligned terrorists. Dozens were killed in bombings on Palm Sunday.]

The Christian influence was shared in that free environment. On that same basis – no non-Buddhist applicant from Sri Lanka should be repatriated until the Sri Lankan Government delivers Common Governance as measured by the UN.

Monday, 26 June 2017

Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

26 June 2017                                          

Private or Public/Local or Global?

Our  youngest daughter who is in a senior management position in Legal Aid, said recently  that she was constrained trying to balance her  post-renovation budget which was to her more challenging than would be for her siblings working in private sector. I listened without judging or relating one directly with the other. Seen from the outside - they are all in large institutions and in senior management positions.   But when taken individually they are diverse in their makeup at that level. As a parent, I need to be receptive to all three of them and to the extent of their diversity on one to one basis – helping them feel that they are right. That is the approach I take with victims of war in Sri Lanka. If I use the common measure – without bringing all three of them individually into me – one or the other would feel let down and rightly so. Hence to the extent they are diverse – we need to listen to them separately – as if they are the only ones needing our services. Within me, I am satisfied that they are all enjoying the returns of their own contributions to their positions in those institutions. The Commonness contribution is their membership with those large institutions – the largest of them being Public Service.  To my mind, our above mentioned Legal Aid senior manager enjoys higher status than the other two and hence it is understandable that she gets relatively less money than her siblings.

With this ‘value’ as the base, I read this morning, the response headed ‘Brighter or Darker skies over SriLankan Airlines?’ by Mr. Rajeewa Jayaweera – also a staff investor in the National Carrier. Of particular importance to me is the following passage:

[2016/17 Performance
Traffic Revenue has reportedly dropped by 6.1% to USD 790 million in 2016/17 from USD 842 million in 2015/16. Passenger Revenue is down by 6.5% to USD 685 million from USD 725 million and Cargo Revenue down by 7% to USD 80 from USD 87 million.
Key contributory factors have been a 2% reduction in revenue passenger kilometers (RPKs) in 2016/17 from previous year (RPK is calculated by multiplying the number of revenue-paying passengers on board a flight by the distance traveled), a 3% reduction in Passenger Yields and 11% reduction in Cargo Yields from previous year. It has negated a 3% increase in number of passengers carried from previous year.
One of the reasons attributed to the "weakening of the balance sheet" in the media release was the non- recovery of "drop in ticket prices" as a result of "fuel price reduction in 2015". Nevertheless, a reliable source stated "average fuel price paid by the airline in US cents per gallon in 2016/17 was 3% less than average price paid in 2015/16".
Drop in ticket prices need be addressed with innovative and dynamic sales, pricing and marketing strategies, by the commercial division, besides stringent controlling of costs by all concerned, top down.
Drop in ticket prices is a universal phenomenon and not limited to the Sri Lankan market and SriLankan Airlines. Qatar Airways CEO announced last week, a 20% growth in profits of USD 541 million and a 22% growth in passengers carried on year on year basis.]

There are many reasons for my special focus on this passage. The main one is the Revenue Passenger Kilometers. My mind sought and found the parallel structure in my work at the University of NSW – where as the consultant for the small but active Commercial Unit – Sports Medicine – I learnt to use the parallel of EFTSU – Effective Full Time Student Units presented  as follows by the University of Sydney:

[Fee paying

If you’re a domestic student on a full-fee-paying place, it means your place receives no financial contribution from the government and you are required to pay the full cost of the course.
If you’re an international student, you are required to pay the full international fee for your course.
While some postgraduate courses offer Commonwealth supported places for domestic students, most are offered as full fee paying.
Tuition fees for full-fee-paying places are based on an annual course fee that is reviewed each year.
Annual fees are based on an equivalent full-time student load (EFTSL) of 24 credit points per semester or 48 credit points (1.0 EFTSL) per year. If your study load in any calendar year is more or less than 1.0 EFTSL your tuition fee will differ.]

I used the EFTSU calculations in determining the viability of a particular Course within the Sports Medicine structure. That was like the project within the larger programme of Medicine.
Sri Lankan Airlines needs to be the leader in taking Sri Lankan Public Service towards Democratic Management – starting with its Financial Management.

Qatar Airways - the example chosen by Mr. Rajeewa Jayaweera is down in Home Relationships. As per recent reports:

[EMIRATES and Etihad Airlines have suspended all flights to and from Qatar as Arab nations sever diplomatic ties to the country, accusing it of supporting terrorist groups and backing Iran.] News.com.au

The Accountability factor of Qatar Airways has been shrunk to local levels and hence its reporting does not qualify to be used in ‘global context’/ as an indicator of Universal Phenomenon.
Qatar Airways – to the extent it is fully owned by the Government and therefore is controlled by the Emir of Qatar would have a hierarchical reporting structure. Sri Lankan Airlines was controlled by the Rajapaksa Monarchy and hence those reports did not qualify in the global context. The current government continued in that pathway to exploit Sri Lankan Airlines through the Weliamuna Report for which money was paid for someone lacking wisdom in Airline operations in general and particular to Sri Lankan Airlines’ structure. The only way this would have helped is through Energy developed through his then workplace – which I understand was Transparency International Sri Lanka. One would expect the key aspect of this institution to be Transparency. Yet, the ‘fee’ paid to Mr. Weliamuna was ‘hidden’.

While my intuitive objection was through the way he reported on the areas covered by me- most of which were established and developed by me under the supervision of Singapore International Airlines, on Commercial basis – others who did not have that inner wisdom – attributed negative value to the Weliamuna report once they found out that Mr. Weliamuna accepted money as fees and was not transparent about it.

Had Mr. Weliamuna been transparent – he would have shown efficiency as a Commercial investigator and his recommendations would have profitable in a financial sense. Given that he was not – he had the duty to decline any money and do it as part of his Service Program and that would have helped improve relationships within the whole structure including but not limited to the Government and the then current Staff. The weaknesses identified would continue to show – as per the root purpose of that Weliamuna report which was to rubbish the previous regime which report has had the effect of bringing in Public Service Monitors into  an organisation which is expected to produce a profit:

-        Line minister had no knowledge on national carrier’s decision to terminate deal with Airbus
-        CID probe underway on the purchase of four Airbus A -350 900 aircraft
-       AG questions legality of Airbus agreement and the need to sign numerous agreements with other parties  - Sunday Times Article ‘ More details emerge on SriLankan’s state of affairs

The way effectiveness of an organization is measured could be through Revenue or Expenditure. Taking the traditional family as an example, the way a homemaker spent the money earned by the breadwinner would complete the picture at that level and elevate the ‘Opportunity level’ of the whole family  to the next higher level. It is for this reason that in Hindu culture – women are known as Shakthi / Energy. The homemaker foregoes personal enjoyment to share in Common. Since they do not get credit for earning money – their contribution turns into Energy which supports all money earners who are family to that homemaker.

In terms of Sri Lankan Airlines structure – where Public Service Support is provided to Commercial Operations – that is Homemaker’s contribution. But when Public Officers use the Airlines to show their own credits – they become Equal  breadwinners and they also need to be as Accountable as the Commercial Operators. Neither is expected to contribute to strengthen ‘relationships’ and one must expect divisions and separations followed by De Facto structures due to ‘freedom’ enjoyed at the lower level.

As we sow, so shall we reap. All genuine investors in the Airline will carry with them the ability to develop self-managing structures –including within the Tourism industry.  I for example am using Airbnb support services which facilitate both sides to review each other. THAT is the Universal measure of Democracy based on Equal Opportunity. This is the Energy I share with all those who respect my structures and take their positions within those structures. To me my AirLanka is a Commercial Operation structured under the leadership of Singapore International Airlines.

On that basis – yesterday when I listened to the Prime Minister of Singapore the Hon Lee Hsien Loong,  about the family conflict which was naturally affecting his Public life, I experienced the enjoyment of Transparency through my own parallel with close relatives in Vaddukoddai. Through myself I identified with the Singapore Prime Minister to be a Democratic leader. Likewise,  with the Australian Tamil Diaspora Leader who shared the speech with me.

I believe that this is what Being Global is all about. 

Sunday, 25 June 2017

Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

25 June 2017                                          

You are not my Elder!

[Ahilan Kadirgamar and Mahendran Thiruvarangan are researchers from Jaffna and members of the Collective for Economic Democratisation in Sri Lanka.] - ‘Beyond accountability: the struggle for co-existence in Sri Lanka’ published by Open Democracy – free thinking for the world

[Ahilan Kadirgamar is a political economist based in Jaffna] – ‘Limits of exclusivism’ Published by the Hindu.

Which description of Mr. Kadirgamar is the true one? Likewise which description of Northern Province is true? – Mr. Wigneswaran’s or Mr. Sampanthan’s or Neither?

My spiritual guru says as per my recollection  - that there are three ‘I’s. The ‘Gaja’ that others say I am; the ‘Gaja’ that I think  I am,  and the Gaja being I am. The last one is Truth / Soul – the ultimate goal of seekers of Sovereignty.

On that basis – Jaffna to me is the Jaffna I can work naturally. Towards this I have to, from time to time come down to the start to take my the place as who others say I am. That gives me zero advantage or disadvantage relative to others in the environment – known through majority expressions. For example, I – a Chartered Accountant in Sri Lankan environment – became a bookkeeper in Sydney – after I failed to win jobs at the higher level of the Accounting profession. – That was stage (1)

Then I regulated myself as per the needs of my supervisors and became supervisor in those units / institutions – ensuring that I acted within the law at all times. That was stage (2)

When those above me failed to uphold my earned position – and I left that institution I relied on who I thought I was in Australian workplace – as per Australian rules, when I applied for new jobs. But once I won those jobs and completed my responsibilities as per the stated selection criteria – my mind became still and I started showing who I really was. This declaration happened at shorter and shorter intervals when the new institution was more disorderly than the ones I had worked previously. The University of NSW topped the list and hence  the manifestation when the new Vice Chancellor came from America. The American return Vice Chancellor did not study the local structure to negate his American advantage and hence his misfit was worse than that of the previous Vice Chancellor – who like Mr. Trump was Australian trained expecting to go global as is. I was arrested by the American return and when I invoked the true Energies of the University I was able to reverse the punishment on him.  This is why Peaceful Assembly / Sathya Graham should not only be made unlawful nor be disrespected.

In the recent Northern Provincial Council issue in Sri Lanka, Mr. Wigneswaran is the parallel of American return Vice Chancellor and Mr. Sampanthan the parallel of the old Vice Chancellor who sought to remain status quo. Since Mr. Wigneswaran was new to Politics – he used his natural Administration pathway when in Judiciary. Hence one could state that the conflict was similar to the one between former Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake and then President Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa.

In his Hindu article – Limits of Exclusivism, Mr. Kadirgamar states in this regard:
[The controversy was essentially a manifestation of a simmering political conflict within the Tamil polity. Tension had been brewing within the NPC since the regime change in January 2015. The Tamil nationalists’ preferred discourse of victimhood and the need for international intervention during the authoritarian Rajapaksa regime suddenly confronted the geopolitical agenda of the West and India, which moved close to the new government in Colombo. The TNA leadership in Parliament shifted its approach towards engaging Colombo. However, Mr. Wigneswaran, along with politicians within and outside the NPC, firmly held his exclusivist, if not separatist, line.]
I do identify with this picture. It was interesting to note that the Tamil Diaspora’s Energy moved close to Mr. Wigneswaran who represents the more Educated Tamil within the Sri Lankan community in addition to officially representing the Nationalist agenda of Activists. As I say these days within local circles – let’s identify with the Energy that each participant activates.

There is Matter at the lowest end and there is Energy at the highest end. To my mind the two combined become the Force that manifests as outcome at that time, at that place. Matter, Force and Energy are my parallels of Body, Mind and Soul. Once our contribution reaches Energy state – it operates on its own and one who stays within her/his Truth will identify with the outcome manifested by her/his contribution. This is the power of One that Gandhi had and it was this Energy that brought out the 2015 election outcome to make Tamils the leading opposition in National Parliament despite being minority in terms of numbers. To my mind, that is our parallel of Mr. Obama becoming the American President. Each outcome would confirm the Energies that manifested that outcome at that place, at that time. One who seeks the Truth through her/his Truth and without ‘judging’ on the way – will identify with the Truth.

The conflict happened due to lack of Consolidating Energy within Tamil Political Leadership – the same way Sinhalese Political Leadership is also suffering. As per the history of Tamil Politics the two leading parties kept dividing and uniting during ‘normal’ times and ‘emergencies’ respectively. During normal times we naturally promote debate and our contribution is stored as Energy at that place. During emergencies – those Energies raise themselves to support us.

Mr. Wigneswaran was Recruited before he was  Elected by the People of Jaffna. The People of Jaffna here is all those to whom Jaffna is ‘home’. Even one person to whom Jaffna is ‘home’ today and wanting to identify with that Energy at the current leadership level, would add to the Recruitment of themselves  in that position. Current bodies in Jaffna when they are open to such influence – would become the media through which this Energy would manifest Itself. Out of all Tamil politicians available at the time of Provincial Council Elections, those like Mr. Sumanthiran who had knowledge of global politics – did not offer to take represent Tamils to the world at Provincial level. They wanted to play the big game at National level and beyond. Given Mr. Wigneswaran’s demonstrated interest in Tamil Politics and his status through the judicial pathway – he seemed to be the best person available for the job as defined by the Tamil Political Leadership. Without Mr. Wigneswaran, the Home Energy of Tamils who invested strongly in Administration despite the discriminatory practices by majority race, would not have been invoked to give shape to Northern Province as a leading Province in Sri Lanka – especially after the Terrorism label pinned through militants.

But having accepted the position, Mr. Wigneswaran was lost between the dynamics of  various groups who had influence over current bodies / matter in Jaffna. They are strongly influenced by ‘pro-boys’ whose pathway they can relate to better than the Colombo pathway. Often I hear in Jaffna that some problem or the other would not have happened if the ‘Boys’ were in control. In my mind, I say ‘the Army also would not have come if not for the Boys’. This I believe, diffuses the Energy of military spreading through such bodies. They are like tyre mechanics placing nails on the road – for business. Given that Jaffna has suffered due to the war – I merely listen to them without expressly administering them. I use administration actively in our Temple activities and through our Training Centre at Vaddukoddai junction. In terms of others, unless I have a medium through whom to communicate my investment in Law and Order of global standards, I mentally vote against their expressions / manifestations to kill the negative Energy that induced that manifestation. Theirs is current political right. Mine is Cumulative Administrative Right. Likewise Mr. Sampanthan and Mr. Wigneswaran respectively.

In terms of hierarchy Mr. Wigneswaran at Provincial level is of lesser status than the Colombo Tamil politicians. When this is expressed laterally – Colombo Tamil leader has majority power over Jaffna Tamil leader. Mr. Sampanthan erred by demonstrating that power to satisfy his voters. The effect is that Tamil politicians USED Mr. Wigneswaran’s status to suit their own purposes and failed to pay him the respects of an Administrative elder within the Tamil Community. That brings to mind the expression of an Aboriginal boy to a White Administrator in a local film. When the White man says that he ought to be respected as an elder – the young indigenous boy states words to the effect ‘you are not MY elder’!.  Jaffna Tamils who have become more and more Indigenous due to emigration especially of the more educated Tamils – would soon not recognize Mr. Wigneswaran as their elder. This was demonstrated by the elected representatives who would not be ‘told’ by Mr. Wigneswaran but would seek the association of ‘foreigner’ to Tamils – Governor, Mr. Reginald Cooray – who was not their elder. That happened in 2005 when LTTE traded money for voting rights of Tamils during Presidential Elections, to prevent Tamils from voting. Their message to Mr. Wigneswaran was that he was not their elder!

But so long as Mr. Wigneswaran continues to contribute to Tamils as a whole, Jaffna Tamils of his class will add their Energy to chase away the forces working against intellectual Administration.  Whether they know it or not – Colombo Politicians need him to stay in Jaffna to confirm our investment in reliable Administration which the armed militants also contributed to when they followed orders of their respective leaders – despite those leaders not carrying status at wider level. They also would say to the politician without Administrative Energy – ‘you are not my elder’. 

Saturday, 24 June 2017

Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

24 June 2017                                          

The Right to Self-Determination – when and where?
“Before my death sentence is carried out, please remove my eyes and transplant them to a Tamil without eyesight. I will not be able to see the free Tamil Eelam but, at least, let my eyes see it.” Tamil Militant Kuttimani

[At the present time, when Sri Lanka is engaged in formulating a new Constitution, the concept of self-determination of Tamil people has become the subject of much discussion in political circles, civil society organizations and generally among the people.] Lakshman I. Keerthisinghe in Ceylon Today  article ‘A Sri Lankan perspective Right to self determination
There is a saying in Tamil – that even the pillars of Poet Kamban would recite poems. I believe and often say it to immediate family that every corner of our home would speak ‘Due Process’.  In Governance – every pillar in the home area of the Governor must throb with the Energy of Sovereignty. Where there is equal share of responsibility taken by members – individually and/or collectively – self-governance is  confirmed through outcomes. Where there is a fair gap between one and the other/s Due Process is the pathway through which the Energy of the deeper investor in the ‘whole’ is preserved. Every part of the  home of such a leader would sing the praise of that leader’s specialty.

Every person has the right to self-determination. When a group of people of similar culture are led by such person/s within that culture – they would be a self-governing group. The right to self-determination by Sri Lankan Tamils as such a group, was formerly expressed through Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976. Majority folks in Vaddukoddai therefore need to be self-governing or need to show a self-governing person/group as their leader. The pathway through which this happened was Political. Yet, militants took-over the agenda and demoted Vaddukoddai’s status as follows:
[On 1 August 1982 T. Thirunavukarasu, the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) MP for Vaddukoddai, died and on 14 October 1982 the TULF nominated Kuttimani (Selvarajah Yogachandran), a leading member of the militant Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization (TELO), to be his replacement.  Kuttimani was at that time in prison awaiting trial on charges related to the Neervely bank robbery. There was dispute as to whether Kuttimani was eligible to be an MP and on 24 January 1983 Kuttimani "resigned" from Parliament, never having taken oath. The TULF subsequently nominated Tiruchelvam to be Thirunavukarasu's replacement.] - Wikipedia
By considering Kuttimani the TULF leaders weakened their claim to self-determination through the Political pathway. Kuttimani being a militant was not entitled to membership benefits within TULF. Wikipedia reports as follows in relation to Kuttimani’s tragic death:

[Kuttimani was arrested by the Sri Lankan Navy on April 5, 1981 and was charged with an array of "criminal acts". The Sri Lankan court sentenced him to death.
The presiding judge said that when he sat down he would pronounce his verdict as required by law. However, before that, he wanted to state that he did not view Kuttimani as a common criminal. He further said that if one day the president was to grant a reprieve to Kuttimani he would be happy to hear of it. Kuttimani's reply showed the world his yearning for a free country (Tamil Eelam) for his people. This was his reply:

Before my death sentence is carried out, please remove my eyes and transplant them to a Tamil without eyesight. I will not be able to see the free Tamil Eelam but, at least, let my eyes see it.

Upon his death sentence, Kuttimani was sent to the Welikada (Welikade) maximum-security prison to wait for his execution. There were both Sinhala and Tamil prisoners. The Sinhala prisoners were convicted of criminal offences such as murder, rape, robbery, etc. The Tamil prisoners were all freedom fighters. The Sinhala and Tamil prisoners were kept apart all the time to avoid racial clashes between them.
Kuttimani was brutally murdered during the 1983 Anti-Tamil pogrom in the island. Sinhalese mobs as well as personnel belonging to the Sri Lankan forces went on a rampage in Tamil areas, torturing and murdering Tamil men and children, raping, torturing and murdering Tamil women and girls, and looting and burning Tamil residences and businesses. Police and army (which were almost exclusively Sinhalese) either participated in this orgy of violence against the Tamils or kept a blind eye.

On 25 July, the second day of the pogrom, the Tamil inmates of the Welikada prison, who almost all of them had been detained without any trial, under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act, were brutally murdered by the Sinhalese convicts with the assistance of the prison guards. According to Amnesty International, some of the Sinhala prisoners were given alcohol and then were encouraged to attack the Tamil prisoners. A large number of the Sinhala prisoners, with knives and other sharp weapons, stormed into the building where some 35-37 Tamil prisoners were lodged. They stabbed, beat and tortured the Tamil prisoners. Genitals of a few prisoners were mutilated.
 Both the eyes of Kuttimani as well as Jeganathan were mutilated and gouged out with iron bars, since he had dreamed of seeing with them, through another person after his execution, an independent Tamil state. One version has it that Kutimani’s tongue was cut out by an attacker who drank the blood and cried: “I have drunk the blood of a Tiger.”  He was then murdered and his body was disposed in front of a statue of the Buddha in the prison yard.]

Was Kuttimani entitled to Politically represent Vaddukoddai once he became a guerrilla fighter? To my mind if the answer says ‘yes’ as per majority Vaddukoddai folks, then we were deviating from the Political pathway towards the military pathway. This automatically writes off our investment in Higher Education. The higher the structure of our education system – the stronger the validity of process needs to be. Self-Governance in higher education is confirmed at PhD level – where we contribute to Theory/Policy. If we seek self-governance at lower level – the area covered needs to be small. Outcomes driven pathways would lead to self governance only when the areas is small. Hence the use of project basis in Democracy where commitment to Due Process has been weakened in large organisations – especially those within Public Service where majority are of one culture. LTTE was strong in military leadership by rejecting power-sharing with other groups.    

The more we depended on ‘showing’ outcomes to others – the smaller our area of governance became. Kuttimani’s world was limited to the Guerrilla groups amongst Tamils. Until they were in the majority his country was much smaller than the Tamil Nation covered by the Vaddukoddai Resolution. If not, then Vaddukoddai Resolution was killed by militants. If militants did not inherit Vaddukoddai Resolution – then they needed to start from zero base and stay away from the investments made by others through traditional pathway of Politics.
Mr. Keerthisinghe states in this regard:

[It is to be noted that although the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) has been an ardent advocate of Tamils being a separate 'people' and that leads them to the right for self-determination, there is not yet a recognized legal definition of 'peoples' in international law.]

The parallel of the above vagueness is ‘Australian Values’ that our politicians often refer to when they feel challenged by minorities. Legally, Australian Law would be taken as Common principle and practice of it would be Australian Value. Any politician before expressing an expectation at National level – has the duty to first make it LAW before pronouncing such expectations outside Parliament House. Otherwise like Kuttimani’s Thamil Eelam – covering a section of Sri Lankan Tamil community, White Australians are referring to English Values when they say Australian values.
The Tamil Traditional pathway of Intellectual Discrimination has been damaged and neglected by Tamils looking for quick outcomes including through militants who fight at the risk of their lives. The recent conflict in Northern Province Politics became public due to lack of Common Due Process, under the leadership of an educated Tamil person and/or group. In 2014, a Sri Lankan doctor residing in Australia killed her abusive husband because her belief that he would one day change did not come true. The problem with those who accept their minority status is that however educated they are they tend to rely on belief and not seek a way out including through the Law. This young lady doctor shares her experience as follows:

"I think emotional abuse was the most difficult part to deal with. That constant manipulation, that constant control which I felt — I was so much trapped, and I could not leave. And constant threats to myself and my family and loved ones made me very helpless."

This happened also because in Sri Lanka, education is more for a living than for higher life. In terms of Natural Justice, the lady is now ‘free’ even though she was sent to prison for manslaughter.
"I thought one day he would change, so I could not believe what happened on that day."
Tamil leaders often said this about why they did not resist militants from killing Politicians. Majority Tamils opposed the killing of Rajiv Gandhi. But to the LTTE which deviated from the root cause – there would have been little room for ‘logic’.
Now that the disorder within the Sinhalese Armed Forces has been made public – society has the duty to think along the lines the Judge in the case against of Kuttimani demonstrated by stating that he did not consider Kuttimani to be a Common Criminal and that he would be happy to learn about a Presidential reprieve.

So long as our internal law and order system is weak we need separation of powers as per our respective cultures so that we could find and live within our own Sovereign paths. We are all born Sovereign and so long as we stay close to our ‘home’ make up,  we would tend to preserve and act within that Sovereignty. Once we seek to rule others or be ruled by others we would need to broaden our thinking to cover the whole as our home-group or devolve power to the extent we are not able to so consider. Sinhala only legislation would have made foreigners of all Sri Lankans to whom Sinhalese was not the mother-tongue. Likewise if English only were to become the law in Multicultural Australia. Sinhalese who considered Tamils as part of their group – in secular institutions – would have been naturally protected from fear of Terrorism – especially when those Tamils do what they can to educate and include militants,  rather than find fault at lower levels to entertain their desire for authority.

The more we rely on outcome based Administration including through military wins, the greater the need to shrink our home base – so that we do not exercise authority over foreigners – even though they carry the Sri Lankan label by law. Every person/group is entitled to pursue the discovery of the Sovereignty in their own pathway – so long as it is NOT unlawful and/or is NOT damaging another’s pathway.

So long as Buddhism foremost is part of the Common Law – it would be difficult for Non-Buddhists to be committed to Common Law. The People in that instance is Buddhists if the makers are to claim Belief as the basis of that law. Hence they do not have jurisdiction over non-Buddhists – be they individuals or groups.

Those driven by majority rule need strong opposition to form the belief based foundation on which Administration is developed. One who Believes is Sovereign and v.v. Given that a non-Buddhist cannot believe that Buddhism is foremost – all Non-Buddhist have the natural entitlement to self-devolution through the highest common pathway in their environment. One who acts to punish a member of minority religion for doing so – is actually earning the debit to be punished in due course of time – as happened in the case of the Sri Lankan lady doctor who was strongly supported by Australians who have embraced the de facto system of marriage where we are entitled to act in our own way – as per our conscience. When we act as per our conscience – we would never wrong the other person nor society that we are both part of.

I believe that if Buddhism foremost clause had been removed from the Common Constitution – not only the war but also the devolution to Provincial Councils would not have been needed. Any good law will uphold the Truth which is carried as Common Belief by a group of People. A law that fails to uphold that Truth / Common Belief – is for political advantage and hence carries the high risk of separating – first with ‘foreigners’ over whom the spirit of such law is enforced and when they resist – the habit damages the internal makeup of those who are used to majority force. This has happened at least twice in Sri Lanka – with the minority becoming leading opposition when the ‘Energy’ invested by majority to uphold Sovereignty of the whole was weaker than the Energy by minorities who often tend to use intellectual discrimination where they are challenged by majority rule. That was how Tamils became leading Opposition in Sri Lankan Parliament – due also to genuine Buddhists who practiced Buddhism with respect for Lord Buddha.
Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

23 June 2017                                          

Corrupt Lawyers indicate Corrupt Justice system
[Meehan’s LinkedIn profile features a quote from US lawyer Clarence Darrow that: “To be an effective criminal defence counsel, an attorney must be prepared to be demanding, outrageous, irreverent, blasphemous, a rogue, a renegade and a hated, isolated and lonely person.
Less than 24 hours before he pleaded guilty, Meehan updated his Facebook profile with a photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator with the catchphrase: “I’ll be back.] The Courier Mail article under the heading ‘Former high-profile solicitor Tim Meehan has pleaded guilty to fraud

I smiled – placing the LTTE in place of Mr. Meehan. When Sinhalese celebrated the defeat of LTTE on the roads of Colombo in 2009, some young Tamils around me said ‘More Prabhakarans will be born’ – which is the parallel statement of Mr. Meehan’s ‘I’ll be back’ declaration. Each time a Sinhalese who is a ‘foreigner’ to Tamils calls the LTTE ‘Terrorists’ the ‘other side’ of that pleasure of unearned authority is born – at the deeper level of the two sides represented. When irrelevant judgments are delivered for ‘gossip’ purposes against one who upholds the Truth the roots of that side are damaged  and disorder happens beyond their control.

In a Court of Law, when Truth is published to uphold Natural Justice any relevant law would bow to that Truth to become a facility for that Truth to become the law in that environment. British Judges of Indian Courts expressed respect for Gandhi for that reason.

I learnt about corrupt lawyers when I expressed in Court  the Truth that the University of NSW (UNSW) needed as per my discovery. The law I used was the Racial Discrimination Act  1975 which is least practiced in Administration by Australian Administrators and Politicians, but is most needed to be part of the global community through higher education. The mandate of  a University is to seek and find the Truth through Research and share that discovery through Teaching.  I performed at the highest level of standards known to me even when I was paid far less than my White Australian parallels. The difference when absorbed developed ownership in the work of the minds that discovered the  Anti Discrimination Law in a Multicultural society.  By accepting my lower returns – I became one minded with them – and hence understand  the above quotation by US lawyer Clarence Darrow that: “To be an effective criminal defence counsel, an attorney must be prepared to be demanding, outrageous, irreverent, blasphemous, a rogue, a renegade and a hated, isolated and lonely person.

To be part of the disorderly system of the UNSW I had to demonstrate conduct that would show me to be disorderly and thus bring out the Truth of the Disorderly in a ‘free’ Association. In an environment that is true to itself – the ‘other’ side would become my opposition. Where this ‘other’ side includes ‘judges’ and I am punished, that environment makes me an enemy of itself and breeds pro terrorism karma.

 Gandhi expressed his Truth which reflected disobedience as well as actions in breach of the law and earned  the punishment of imprisonment through laws ‘foreign’ to majority Indians. When the judge so punishing merely applies the letter of the law as per his duty – it is like Gandhi punishing himself. But where judges went  further than the letter of the law and tried to ‘show’ authority – they bred pro terrorism karma which is still haunting Britain.

When we actively use current measures – we prevent past karma from invoking itself. But when we neglect current measures relevant to our current environment and our position in that environment we invoke our past karma for better or for worse. When we are naturally true to the position through which we earn authority to judge and to discipline insiders and punish outsiders, even our thoughts go towards repairing the roots of a damaged system. This invokes also similar Energies beyond time and place borders. That was how Sri Lankan Tamils won the position of Opposition Leadership in National Parliament, when majority race failed to uphold its own race’s stated principles and values of the past. Lord Buddha is one such elder to majority Sinhalese and like Thesawalamai for Tamils of Northern Sri Lanka, this was embedded into the Common Constitution in addition to the Customary Kandyan Law applicable to Sinhalese. In effect that provision ‘Buddhism Foremost’ effectively sets aside all other provisions of Constitution that do not show a connection to this root. One has to become a Buddhist Politician in mind to know this root. When such politician is at the root – there is no place for Buddha who renounced position benefits to discover the Truth at grassroots level.
Democracy in Administration is ‘foreign’ language to those who have the autocratic genes. I resigned from my UNSW position after hearing Ms Pauline Hanson in August 1998 say to us migrants who did not want to ‘assimilate’ with majority – to go back home. But the true Australians who were also suffering due to ‘foreign laws’ asked me to stay and I forewent the bigger opportunity to stay within their boundaries. Hence when I went to prison for ‘Peaceful Assembly’ I facilitated the Truth of the University to surface Itself – i.e. – that the University was so disorderly that it would threaten through armed forces rather than use the intellectual pathway to uphold its own Truth.

Yesterday Ms Hanson was in hot waters again for claiming that children with disabilities should have separate classrooms. One who was hurt by her observations in 1998 – that migrants who do not assimilate must go back home – would not be surprised by the above expressions. It’s all about separation so Ms. Hanson would mark herself ‘right’ as per the locals in her group who are yet to release themselves from the White Australia policy which was ‘right’ for the government of that time. Ms Hanson like the above lawyer was being true to her part of  Australian society. Like the more educated  Sinhalese in Sri Lankan society who were hurt by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa,  White Australians who have invested in global principles and values, are getting upset now for the same nature surfacing again – this time to damage their own investments. If  Ms Hanson had been disciplined back then by using Global principles that Australian Government has foremost commitment to – Australians would have been saved the pain and anxiety of Terrorism. The prevention Energy is within the control of migrants who have natural authority over their juniors who seek to exercise authority prematurely through the use of the gun. So long as they feel Australian – Australians are protected from such violence.

Given that Indigenous Australians have first authority – those who share in their pain are higher in status than those who separate them as untouchables.

We – each one of us develop our own natural structures as we go through life. Every one of us has the Natural Authority to enjoy ourselves and the benefits in our custody – so long as we have no knowledge of anyone else being affected by it one way or the other. As they say in the Indian system ‘it is an offence to give dowry or receive dowry’. In Sri Lankan Tamil Thesawalamai – dowry has positive value and hence renders dignity to the wife and her side of the larger family. Sri Lankan Tamils who are owners of Sri Lankan Tamil tradition would not therefore easily assimilate with Indian Tamils where the above law is relevant. Hence when the LTTE received money from the then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister – they disconnected with all those who practiced the dowry system. Sri Lankan Tamils have their own structures as per their genuine investments in their local environments.
As per my knowledge of Hinduism – Matter is at the bottom end of order and Energy is at the highest end. Matter is the vessel in which the Energy is preserved. Land is one such vessel. Democracy  in Politics is based Land and those to whom that Land is home are relatives. Ms. Hanson has the authority to state in Parliament only those values that directly affect the electorate that she represents. Ms Hanson often behaves as if she is the Minister or Shadow Minister who represents the issue on behalf of the whole of Australia. That is the curse from indiscriminate use of majority power by producing more and more opposition – without connection to personal belief.
As per 9 News report :
[The One Nation leader made the comments during debate on the federal government's proposed schools overhaul.
Ms Hanson insisted parents and teachers had raised the matter with her.
Teachers were devoting much of their time to disabled children, to the detriment of other students in the classroom, she said.
Disabled and autistic children should be taught in special classrooms where they can be looked after and given special attention, she said.
"If it was one of my children I would love all the time given to them to give them those opportunities - but is it at the loss of our other kids?"]

The above confession confirms that Ms Hanson did not feel the need of her electorate but ‘heard’ those who lacked the courage to represent their beliefs directly to the Government or through experts in the field. This demonstrates that they want an easier time through smaller groups while others learn to ‘integrate’ by sacrificing easy time. It is the parallel of ‘Tamil Eelam’ and ‘Sinhala Only / Buddhism foremost’.

Like Mr. Meehan said about himself – Ms Hanson ‘came back’ – as did Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Joint Opposition – i.e. De facto Opposition. Stayed too long with the LTTE? Likewise, Ms Hanson who through her natural structure tries to be the ‘boss’ of those who seem lesser Australian than herself would merge naturally with those less developed minds taking  authority without belief. They are our internal Terrorist – killing our global investments.

When we as leaders turn blind eye to such disorder within, it grows silently to become Negative value to our heirs and exposes Itself when those who represent those negative values are greater than the numbers who represent positive value. This often happens through passage of time when the younger generation is more global and/or immigration when the migrants’ inherited value is more positive.  

The above lawyer’s mentors were Americans continuing to carry the ‘invasion genes’. In contrast, the  Vice Chancellor of  UNSW who sent me to prison – also brought with him the American mentality of treating Australians as juniors. He got dismissed by the system of Natural Justice when I did not physically resist that injustice. That was proof that I was deeper owner of University of NSW than the American trained Vice Chancellor.

We are free only when we stay within our earned structures. The rest – even if we are sent to prison belongs to those who opposed us – each getting their return as per their own structure. 

Thursday, 22 June 2017

Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

22 June 2017                                          

The Terrorism Label

[On Friday, Vaiko was barred from entering Malaysia on the grounds that he was a supporter of the banned outfit Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and a threat to the country.
The MDMK leader told reporters that he would be writing a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging him to seek an explanation from the Malaysian government.] First Post

Who is right and who is wrong in this matter? The Common aspect between the three nations is the Tamil culture. As per Tamil culture Relationships are important and duty comes before our emotional likes and dislikes. Mr. Vaiko who is a Tamil Politician has the DUTY to act as per Political relationships. LTTE separated itself from the Politicians of the area they claimed as  Tamil Eelam  when they failed to obey LTTE orders. Often, Tamils within the Diaspora say that the ‘Boys started off well but lost their order along the way’. My response to that is that the Boys ‘sold’ the relationship for money. Mr. Vaiko is part of the legacy that the then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Mr. M.G.Ramachandran (MGR) acquired when he funded the Militants and they in turn called him Anna (Big Brother). That was the first indicator that the LTTE were deviating from Tamil Tradition. This led to the Sri Lankan Tamil Politicians being placed below Indian Tamil Politicians who gave money. If the militants were fighting to defend  Traditional  Land, their relationships needed to be on the basis of those to whom that Land was ‘home’. North-Eastern Sri Lanka was never the homeland of MGR. Eventually by killing Tamil Politicians LTTE demoted itself to mercenary status. Then the Natural Forces of all those who sacrificed lower benefits for self-governance in various institutions along various pathways – worked against them. The inheritance from militants at the family level is reverse autocracy by children.

If Mr. Modi ‘supported’ Mr. Vaiko, he would also inherit this legacy. As per the above report:
[Speaking to reporters on Chennai on his arrival, Vaiko, when queried on whether he was treated like a criminal in Malaysia, said: "It was not like that. The common courtesy, genuine courtesy was lacking." ]

It is the DUTY of the officials to uphold the values of their Administrative family above outside Politicians. Had Mr. Vaiko paid his respects to Hon Appapillai Amirthalingam who led the Vaddukoddai Resolution – he would have been entitled to that common courtesy as per the system of Dharma. If Malaysian officials showed Common Courtesy to Mr. Vaiko who openly claims mental relationship with LTTE – they would be failing in their duty as Administrators, leave alone promoting militancy within Malaysia.

To my mind, the deepest value I have brought with me to Australia is this commitment to institutional structures and duties. Australia needs it due to majority race having its origin in the penal community. I left Northern Sri Lanka in 1968, to make a ‘home’ in Colombo. It is that legacy at the time of my completion of home-relationship that I carry with me wherever I go. Rule by guns, swords and knives had no place in that ‘home of mine’. It does not mean that I alienate them. My duty as an educated Tamil is to always take the higher status with such groups – even though I am seen as unpleasant and disorderly by those who takeover power through weapons along a pathway that has deviated from Tradition of relationships. I realise now that this was why I assembled peacefully at the office of the Vice Chancellor of the University of NSW after completing my work as per the requirements of my POSITION. The Administrators who were actively connected to their origins from the penal colony called the armed officers, confirming their lack of commitment to the Intellectual pathway as per the Institution of Higher Education.

In my article headed ‘If you are all Australians we are all Indians’
I quoted Mr. Abbott as follows in relation to ANZAC day celebrations:
[The modern world is unimaginable without the legacy of Western civilisation,” Mr Abbott said.“It will help the Liberal Party if we place ourselves firmly on the side of Western civilisation against its critics, and of Australian values against the politically correct wreckers and cynics. But we shouldn’t do so to win elections; we should do so because it’s right. “If you are an Australian, you have to believe in Australia.” He said “all too often” Australians were hostile towards their country and its values, including part-time ABC host and Muslim activist Abdel-Magied.
Government MPs have called on the ABC and Foreign Minister Julie Bishop to sack the 26-year-old from the national broadcaster and a government board, run by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, after she wrote: “Lest. We. Forget (Manus, Nauru, Syria, Palestine).”

“Why is it that only some opinions get you sacked, or investi­gated by the Human Rights Commission?” he said.
“An over-promoted, politically correct 26-year-old is merely the symptom of the cultural cowardice that’s penetrated to the very heart of our institutions. While officialdom wrings its hands in nervous self-doubt about anything that might be labelled anti-youth, anti-women, anti-black or, perhaps worst of all, anti-Muslim, Australians show what they think of our country’s knockers by turning out in ever-increasing numbers and ever-greater enthusiasm on Anzac Day” ]
There are different pathways through which we make our homes in Australia. ANZAC day is part of  the Traditional pathway through which majority race maintains its orderly pathway. Those of us who respect the orders in our own cultures would have little difficulty in appreciating those celebrations. They are certainly part of Australian structures through which Common Australian values are produced. The above post “Lest. We. Forget (Manus, Nauru, Syria, Palestine).”  was made by Ms Yassmin Abdel-Magied when the lady was holding office in ABC. To even think those comments on ANZAC day, amounts to an attack and not in defence. They are Australian values but expressed on a day when we were honouring fellow Australians who represented us in wider society. Whatever we may be on the inside – we Australians show an image as law abiding society of global standards, to wider world. It’s a Common pathway used by most successful migrants, to make our homes in Australia. This includes Australians of British origin.  Manus, Nauru, Syria, Palestine are part of the exterior and is about those to whom Australia is not yet home.

Ms Abdel-Magied , through her actions acknowledged that they were inappropriate. They reflected lack of respect for her position in ABC which is Nationally funded. Mr. Abbott’s response / reaction that ‘the modern world is unimaginable without Western civilization’ is also an attack on those of us who bring our positive values with us and integrate it with previous Australian values rather than ‘enforce’ from above as Mr. Abbott’s ancestors did. While in Democracy we have the obligation to show our achievements through objectively measurable outcomes – such as majority vote – we have no authority to diminish the value of Time-based seniority of a group at a particular place. Just because they are quietly treasured and practiced does not mean that we have embraced majority rule. If not for my Tamil culture which includes respect for elders while we are in their ‘home-territory’ – I would have assimilated the easy way and would have damaged the pathway through which the blessings of all those who follow those position based structures coming Naturally to protect Australians during their times of need. As a member of the Tamil community which includes militants – I have the ability and willingness to confidentially educate them towards expressing opposition through higher pathways. I believe that I also made this contribution towards the Tamil National Party becoming the leading Opposition in National Parliament.
I wrote on 20 June, under the heading ‘Value of Advocacy’ :
The boundaries of a relationship are important in developing institutional values.  I was unhappy therefore when I read this morning that our Foreign Minister the Hon Julie Bishop is planning on going to Sri Lanka in relation to Dengue Control which is outside her portfolio.]
I was hurt by the Australian Foreign Minister giving priority to Australian work in Sri Lanka, outside the current order of priority in Sri Lanka as per Sri Lanka’s needs. That amounts to ‘using Sri Lanka’ and therefore Sri Lankans to promote the particular interests of the Minister’s culture. The timing, like that of  Ms Abdel-Magied is disorderly when Sri Lanka needs to earn its eligibility as part of the Community that is bound by Common Global culture based on UN laws. Like Ms Abdel-Magied, Ms Bishop is also publicly funded and has the obligation to stay within the boundaries of the UN. There was dead silence on the part of Australian Government, starting with the Prime Minister in response to the involvement of international minds in regulating the Justice system in Sri Lanka.
Now that Australia also is challenged by Global Terrorism of which LTTE with its origins in Sri Lanka’s North is part – one would have expected Australia to invest in the  Justice system  before the physical health system.

Lack of Self-Confidence to take the higher position with Sri Lanka? – that is how the Truth comes out in a ‘free environment’. The laws through which we receive benefits including status benefits – show the pathway to Australian values.  Yet we hear no criticism of Ms Bishop’s lack of respect for her tax-payer funded position – along the lines we heard when Ms Abdel-Magied demonstrated similar disrespect. Australia’s commitment to law and order is strongly protected and nurtured by those of us who carry those traditional values as our Nature. We would protect and nurture them even when threatened by the official armed forces of majority race.