Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam – 28 Sept 2015
LTTE Leader – the Sole Leader of SRI LANKA?
At first glance of the Colombo Telegraph article
‘Daham Sirisena Responds To Nepotism Charge’, I thought I was disappointed that
the son of the current President of Sri Lanka was following in the footsteps of
the former President’s son. But when I looked inside myself a bit deeper – I was
no longer disappointed but realized that that behavior was to be expected due
to the infection in his environment. This confirmed to me that wherever the
current occupant of that position took leadership – we would need to strengthen
our leadership contribution through other positions – in this instance the
position of Prime Minister through Mr.
Ranil Wickremesinghe. That is what self-governance is about. As per the above
article:
[Daham
Sirisena, son of President Maithripala Sirisena, who came in for a
lot of flak for accompanying his father to the UN General Assembly although he
had no official representative status has posted a ‘rebuttal’ on his Facebook
page (where he describes himself as a public figure). The following is the full
note posted by the young Sirisena;
Dear friends,
What is nepotism? The real meaning behind it is the
abuse of power with influence favoring one’s children, relatives and friends
especially by giving them occupations. Open your minds to this definition and
take a moment to think whether this is being practiced in Sri Lanka now. Many
have been criticizing my visit to the Delegation, saying that it is nepotism
and that i am unjustifiably abusing my father’s power. Let me put my friends’
minds at rest, by firstly saying that i was officially invited to the
Delegation since my mother couldn’t attend. Secondly by attending the event i
got the opportunity to attend the youth-led event of SDG which made me
understand the goals which is needed for the country to be more prosperous. How
could my attendance be a negative effect to the country? How could my
attendance be the downfall of the country? I urge you all not to compare me and
my family with the past regiments as we are far different from them.
At the event The officials stated that, next time to
bring in more youths with more innovative ideas which could in turn enrich our
country by seeing my presence. I believe that this is a great opportunity to
give positive recognition to our country.]
In contrast let’s look at the feelings of appreciation for the Prime
Minister’s wife, quietly shared within
the Diaspora:
[Sent:
26 September 2015 21:24
Subject: Re: Prof. Maithri Wickremesinghe
Subject: Re: Prof. Maithri Wickremesinghe
[Exemplary
act by PM’s wife!]
A function took place at committee hall A of the BMICH yesterday 12 September 2015, to launch a compilation of articles of P. Malalgoda, compiled by Dr. Hansamala Ritigahapola. The keynote lecture was delivered on the occasion by Prof. Sunil Ariyaratne. As Dr.
Ritigahapola is a lecturer of mass communication at the Sri Jayewardenepura University, lecturers and professors from universities across the country were in attendance.
As participants were having refreshment following the book launch, they were surprised to find Prof. Maithri Wickremesinghe, wife of prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, among them. Prof. Ariyaratne asked her, “I didn’t see you in the front row. You came just now?” In answer, Prof. Wickremesinghe said, “I arrived a bit late. There were no vacant seats in the front row. So, my friend and I went to the balcony and watched the entire programme. Professor, your lecture was very good.”
Surprised by her answer, the guests talked among themselves, “This is what you call “the filled vessel makes no noise”. Had a previous VVIP lady been present, two rows would have been reserved for her and her security. The ceremony would not have begun until her arrival. Ignoring the writer of the book, all the media would have shown her. This is the
difference between then and now.”]
A function took place at committee hall A of the BMICH yesterday 12 September 2015, to launch a compilation of articles of P. Malalgoda, compiled by Dr. Hansamala Ritigahapola. The keynote lecture was delivered on the occasion by Prof. Sunil Ariyaratne. As Dr.
Ritigahapola is a lecturer of mass communication at the Sri Jayewardenepura University, lecturers and professors from universities across the country were in attendance.
As participants were having refreshment following the book launch, they were surprised to find Prof. Maithri Wickremesinghe, wife of prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, among them. Prof. Ariyaratne asked her, “I didn’t see you in the front row. You came just now?” In answer, Prof. Wickremesinghe said, “I arrived a bit late. There were no vacant seats in the front row. So, my friend and I went to the balcony and watched the entire programme. Professor, your lecture was very good.”
Surprised by her answer, the guests talked among themselves, “This is what you call “the filled vessel makes no noise”. Had a previous VVIP lady been present, two rows would have been reserved for her and her security. The ceremony would not have begun until her arrival. Ignoring the writer of the book, all the media would have shown her. This is the
difference between then and now.”]
In a Democracy, Families of Public
Officials have the duty to not only know that they are independent of their
family elders but also Demonstrate it in action if they seek to be in public
life. Bringing the spouse to public functions is an inclusion of family to
relax the mind of the leader. In the hierarchical system, this is often
reserved for the wife who supports the husband who is often officially ‘lonely’
at the top. But the current President through the makeup of the Governance
structure already has such an Equal Spouse in the Prime Minister. Mr.
Wickremesinghe was the only person entitled to be present at equal level as the
President at the UN. By going to India to work out the real solution – through the
concept of ‘Community of Nations’ Mr. Wicremesinghe confirmed to us that he was
the real leader of Democratic Sri Lanka –
acceptable to Tamils.
The President’s son is reported to have
stated:
‘Let
me put my friends’ minds at rest, by firstly saying that i was officially
invited to the Delegation since my mother couldn’t attend. Secondly by
attending the event i got the opportunity to attend the youth-led event of SDG
which made me understand the goals which is needed for the country to be more
prosperous. How could my attendance be a negative effect to the country? How
could my attendance be the downfall of the country? I urge you all not to
compare me and my family with the past regiments as we are far different from
them’
In one stroke this young guy has undone the
good name earned by the current President as a humble leader. True humility is
born in the home of Truth. Gandhi’s Sathya Graham (Home of Truth) was
confirmation of his humility. Such humility at public level happens when one
renounces benefits earned from a higher position to become common at the lower
level. This in a subjective environment is made up of People – and hence
Government takes Equal position to Opposition ; and in an objective environment is as per the
measures/laws used.
In
Truth – Mr. Wickremesighe who was denied the position of Presidency back in
2005 due to collusion between the Tamil Tigers and Mr. Rajapaksa did not lose
his earned status. It was ‘in-waiting’ earning interest until Tamils could be
facilitated to vote – free of LTTE influence. Without Mr. Wickremesinghe – the current
Sri Lankan Government would not have the support of self-governing Tamils. Self-Governing
persons naturally influence their environments by their mere presence.
At a recent meeting of the Sri Lanka
Reconciliation Forum – Sydney – a young Sinhalese participant stated in
relation to Sri Lankan elections - that as per statistics a significant percentage
of young voters did not vote. But there was claim that youth influenced the
current outcomes. As a person investing in seeking Truth I attributed the cause
to be a true feeling of identity with global education – including through war
related activities. This young participant however went on to state as part of
this youth-group – that the country had suffered for 30 years and that all they
(the youth group) knew was war. I could not believe that someone could make
such claims – having some of us Tamils in the group. I was acutely conscious of
the difficulties Tamil youth had to go through relative to Sinhalese youth to preserve
and keep our tradition going. I recalled how young ones had to cross Kilali lagoon
to cross over to Jaffna to do their exams. I recalled how medical students who were
running away from Jaffna were rounded up and shot dead in front of their
colleagues. I was conscious of the loss and pain suffered by some of us due to
this particular war, participating in that forum. I felt really offended by the presentation of
that Sinhalese youth leader without depth of experience but wearing the status
as if that person was an authority. On the way home when I shared this pain with my husband he said that his
batch-mate had shared with him similar experience – when he took his baby from
Colombo to Jaffna, to get the blessings of his mother. They covered the babies
and some babies died due to choking. These are experiences – real experiences
that have earned almost every Tamil family in Sri Lanka’s North & East the
entitlement to govern themselves.
The following media coverage confirms the
above youth’s ‘attitude’:
[Wednesday, 12 August 2015
Currently there are 2.4 million or so youth between the ages of 18-24. The oldest among this group turned 18 during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s first presidential term.
This group witnessed the cruelty of the LTTE and the war that brought devastation to both sides. They also experienced the relief that came with the demise of Prabhakaran, the LTTE leader. During the 2010-2015 this group also learned to accept, by choice or otherwise, Mahinda Rajapaksa as the uncrowned but seemingly unassailable king of the country. ]
The above group is not inclusive of Tamil youth. To Tamil civilians – LTTE was an
army government and no Tamil would think that LTTE was capable of being CRUEL to the whole of Sri Lanka! This kind of blaming it all on LTTE – if it were
genuine – would have influenced the Sinhalese to stay away from any war-related
activity. Instead, they are now trying to ‘tell’ Tamils – even self-governing
Tamils like myself – that they were
the victims of war !!!!! LTTE if it were
so powerful to Terrorize the whole of Sri Lanka, then only a Tamil who has the
Trust of LTTE qualifies to lead Sri Lanka. Otherwise Sinhalese would continue
to have greater fears of invasion from LTTE than they had before the war!
We do not need any Truth and Reconciliation
Commission to know this! A senior participant who spoke on behalf of rural
Sinhalese – stated that there was always the fear of India taking-over Sri
Lanka. Those who are driven by majority would be fearful of a majority greater
than themselves. This fear as per this participant increased after they had knowledge
of Indian Government’s support of the LTTE. But it was not strong enough to
turn the tide of Tamil Nationalism to Sri Lankan Nationalism. It’s an emotional
reaction that isolates them if they fail to raise it to intellectual level or
join forces through true humility.
A Tamil participant stated that we needed
someone like Gandhi to develop a common National identity. This cannot happen
from youth participants who think faster than their belief nor Political
leaders with commitment to Representation of the electorate as is ( before
personal Truth). It is more likely to happen from within the Tamil Community of
the Generation that suffered most. If the civilian deaths within the Tamil
Community is taken as being due to LTTE – and ONLY LTTE – then no Sinhalese is
entitled to be part of the solution. We are capable of developing our own
solution with the little we have – based on the same principles of ‘Community
of Nations’ through which Sri Lankan Government escaped International scrutiny.
Only a true Sri Lankan Tamil can turn the tide of Tamil Nationalism towards Sri
Lankan Nationalism which would by its very nature preserve and promote Tamil
Diversity which would be attractive to Sri Lankan Sinhalese who stay within
their earned borders of self-governance and not ‘Tell’ Tamils including Sri
Lankan Tamils, Jaffna Tamils or
Batticaloa Tamils or Hill Country Tamils
that they – the Sinhalese have suffered in the war – as if they were the
sole-representatives of the war-victims!
The young one highlighted that we now call
ourselves – not Sri Lankan but Sri Lankan Sinhalese or Sri Lankan Tamil. This is our reality and it honors those who
suffered due to the ethnic war. I then asked the senior who presented the rural
Sinhalese mind – as to how he would describe himself. He said ‘Sri Lankan’. In
that case – the presentation was more intellectual than being based on shared-feelings.
I said in turn that before the war – I described myself as Sri Lankan. But now –
I describe myself as Sri Lankan Tamil. If I identified with the other person – there
would be no reason to expressly state it. But in the position I have taken in
this issue – Sri Lankan Tamil is the most appropriate description and that
would also distinguish us from Indian Tamils.
A senior Tamil married to a Sinhalese
demonstrated this beautifully – through her experience at one of the
conferences organized by the Sri Lanka Reconciliation Forum. The lady said that
during the event a young Australian Tamil had helped her take down notes and
comfortably participated in the event. When it came to talking about
Reconciliation the young lady had protested and said ‘NO’. When asked by the
senior as to why? – the young lady had said words to the effect - ‘I would be
dishonoring all home folks who suffered’. It is the Beautiful Truth that has
evolved and stated so comfortably by young one and heard with belief by a senior.
Recently, a young Sinhalese artist claimed
that the performing arts in North was not as well developed as in South. One
example given was the poor attendance at special screening of films during the
recent film festival in Jaffna. I
pointed out that Tamils usually follow Indian leadership in Performing Arts. In
terms of their war pain Tamils were more likely to share it with Indian Tamils
than with Sinhalese. Given that our own experiences (including through family
and community) are often the basis of
Performing Arts – it is more likely that Indian films would depict our pain more
Truthfully those made in Sri Lanka. I pointed out that there were already such
films available to the Tamil Public. They have deeper meaning not only because
of Sri Lankan Tamils but also due to the large intake of Refugees by India – on
emotional links which lead to Political bondage. I pointed out that Truth was the basis of real
art and stated that my art was my ‘writing’.
The war experience would be shared by
parents with their children over many decades to come. It’s part of the healing process and needs to
be facilitated more at the private level through small groups at village level. I listen to war widows and observe orphans
through such community network. In turn I share my strengths with them. My
children who are themselves parents now – remember with appreciation that I
told them stories of Krishna and Rama while feeding them as children. I seek to
contribute to such heritage development based on our Truth. Some such legends
may show up Tamil Tigers as heroes and
that also would be healing in all its sadness – once we have an alternate less
violent pathway.
It would be difficult for Tamil
Professionals to lead Sinhalese and v.v. – without this kind of common belief. That was one of the main reasons why I had to
take the Administrators of the University of New South Wales to Court through
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. I did not know it then but now I
believe that my investment in Professional Dharma/Ethics was accumulating and
was in-waiting to empower me to redeem myself from a system that was not true
to itself. When leaders – be they Australians or Sri Lankans - get their
remuneration the easy way – they do not have the motivation to change. From the
time we realize their limits, we need to become Observers of the system and not
be providers, beneficiaries or perpetrators or victims of the system. When we
cease to expect even our earned benefits – we know we have crossed the border
to be entitled to ‘free-observer’ status. That’s when we make Policy
contribution that would strengthen the old values and restructure the pathways
for young heirs of the system. All others need to stay within their
Institutional structures when speaking and sharing publicly. That is their
PROTECTION from being infected by the diseases in their environment –
especially that of mental instability – hallucination for the perpetrator and
depression for the victim.
Separation of Powers is needed when we are
in a subjective forum. In a forum of Sinhalese and Tamils we need to arrange
separate seating for Sinhalese, Tamils and ‘others’. No Sri Lankans. Within
Tamil only forums – the seating needs to be men on one side and women on the
other. As an honest member of the Sri Lanka Reconciliation Forum declared ‘ All
Senior, Sinhalese, Males’ must effective ‘retire’ ! But then there would be no
active participants who have had the experience of perpetrators of Subjective
Discrimination!!! I would say seating arrangement to remind us what we are
dealing with, lest we forget when we do not ‘see’.
Most of us do not know the causes of the
suffering during the war. Yet blame is attributed by both sides on each
other. The reasoning by those with status in that group – is taken as the ‘right’
reason by those without deep investment in the issue – as confirmed by the
President’s son who explained how his presence at the UN was beneficial to Sri
Lanka! One must have the dignity of one’s own contribution to the UN to be
physically present there – above anyone else who is not going, and known to
that person in that person’s group – the youth group in this instance. To my mind it is not different to the young
Sinhalese participating in the Sri Lanka Reconciliation Forum, Sydney - explaining
the war situation to those of us who have had the experience and still carry
the pain.
Where it is difficult to identify through
the Causes – one has the duty to identify through the Effects – as the UN has finally done. Where
the Sinhalese are claiming that the
Sinhalese Community suffered more than the Tamil Community – due to the war
with the LTTE – then they are claiming that their Government which despite majority
power could not bring under its control an armed group of Tamils who are only a
small proportion of the Tamil Community in Sri Lanka – is indeed a weak
Government. It’s not about numbers. It’s about the mind. The more consolidated
the mind, the higher the thought-order. Those who rely on majority power defeat
themselves unless they stay local. Sinhalese soldiers in Tamil areas with
strong Tamil mind would be open such weakness if their government has received
money and status on the claim of Democracy. All Tamils have to do is to
continue to pursue higher education and develop strong minds – minds that not
only Indians would be attracted to but wider world too, to help Sinhalese
defeat themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment