Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam – 08 July 2015
Vaddukoddai Resolution & Thesawalamai
Out of human laws – at the fundamental
level – there are two criteria that confirm validity and as to who has the
authority to use that law to support or discipline the other:
(1)
Time based – as in Frist come
first served.
(2)
Place/Land – as in majority
occupation.
The laws used officially by Australia are
of the second category. Customary Laws – such as Thesawalamai in Northern Sri
Lanka are of the first category. Under this category – an Indigenous Australian
has the right to ask a White Australian – for example Ms Pauline Hanson or Ms
Dawn Fraser to go back to their Land
outside this place called Australia.
Where an area / subject matter is covered
by Customary Law – the right to judge rests with the member of the group
covered and supported by the Customary Law over - a non-member.
Where there is disunity in a group to whom a block of Land – say Sri Lanka – is
common place of residence – the ruling is time-based. Hence an Indigenous
Australian has the right to rule over later migrants.
Where there is harmony –say Canberra within
Australia – the Natural Law is as per majority rule. But those who ask others to ‘go
back home’ lose this right due to having disturbed the harmony – be it due to
race, age, disability or other time based or looks-only based seniority. Then since there is no longer Unity – time based
priority rights apply. By default -
those who contribute to disunity by failing to practice Equal
Opportunity principles - are thus rendering themselves to be judged by their
seniors on time basis.
If the other side is genuinely Democratic -
the other side automatically turns the judgment against those who ask others to
go back home in one form or the other. To
my mind, this reversal happened to Judge and dismiss Mr. John Howard who failed
to take disciplinary action against Ms. Pauline Hanson who asked migrants who
would not assimilate – to go home. I
believe that my Energies were part of the marginal forces needed towards this
reversal. I learnt through those experiences – that each one us has the power
to so reverse judgments. Towards this we need true seniority over them –
through our deeper investments. I thus leant that I am senior to Mr. Howard in
Democratic Australia – due to my substantive contribution to Democracy.
When I said about my sister-in-law - ‘If she were true to herself – she would now
go back to Vaddukoddai where it is possible that there is a group which would
identify with her.’ – it was as per her personal Truth expressed as per the
laws of Thesawalamai which are applicable to those of Northern Sri Lanka. Truth
– be it personal or common – is above all laws. But for it to be valid, it must
be expressed only within the area of Belief and/or Commonly applicable
law. Democracy is NOT a system in which
most Vaddukkoddai Tamils of my
sister-in-law’s age had invested in. In
addition, due to LTTE empowering itself through Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976 –
the folks of Vaddukoddai are automatically paying a part of their current
investment in Democracy to compensate for the damage caused to the investment
made in Democracy, by others of that Land-area. This problem arises when the
two systems are indiscriminately mixed towards quick /hasty outcomes.
My sister-in-law was benefiting from the
system of Democracy by migrating to Australia. Since she failed to respect and
value the system of Democracy, anyone who is senior to her on the basis of time
– and has invested genuinely in Democracy would Naturally reverse any judgment
by her on herself. Accordingly – my husband who even though younger than his
sister in age – became the medium of
reversal and asked her to go back to Vaddukoddai. As per the law of Thesawalamai he had this
authority inherited from his father. Both our higher True investments in Democracy
became the source of True authority for the reversal. The system of Truth will
not override its own laws.
Laws cannot be enforced for just outcomes.
Truth will do the necessary reversals – provided we remain within our Truth and
submit to Truth through Due Common Processes. Hence, where our investment in
the official law is weak – it is better to submit to Truth than to enforce
through administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment