Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
09 November 2017
American
Soul-Mate
Most
of us in our own ways accept the value of Soul. To my mind, when I accept money for a
particular service I need to be able to work out what the person paying me for
that service would be satisfied with. This is a combination of:
(i)
The physically observable – the common
form being money
(ii)
Based on common principles – the common form
being status
(iii)
The Soul value / Common Belief – has no form.
When
my standards are lower than that of the
person paying me and this is transparent, I am an employee or dependent customer satisfying
the rules of (i) above.
When
my standards are higher than that of the person paying me and this is
apparent I am an employer or independent
supplier of service satisfying the rules of (ii) above.
When
my standards are higher than that of the
person receiving my services but I make us look equal/common, I am able to influence the other through soul
power. When the other side also accepts me the stronger power works like laser
surgery.
We
form families, institutions, communities and nations towards this soul value.
Relationships and the laws and rules that regulate those relationships help us
realise this soul value and sustain each other during the journey. In religion,
this soul value is high where the leader has been recognized for a long time to
have realised her/his soul value. This soul value is the most difficult one to
identify with in money rich environments.
The
Daily News in its report headed ‘US announces grant to promote religious
freedom in Sri Lanka’ states:
[The US has announced a grant of nearly USD 500,000 for organisations
which can come up with ideas and projects to promote religious freedom in India
and Sri Lanka.
The
Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, in its
notice, said it seeks to "reduce religiously-motivated violence and
discrimination in India" through its USD 493,827 programme.
And
for Sri Lanka, it seeks to ensure that authorities at all levels of government
in Sri Lanka effectively implement national laws and policies protecting
religious freedom.]
At
first glance one could claim that this is interference in the Administration of
other countries. But after my personal experience in which my book ‘Naan Australian’ came through Indian
branch of Library of Congress to National Library of Australia I identify
with the third dimension in the Common American who has become a soul-mate.
This third dimension through the Soul
Energy is in all our interactions and when we identify with each other through
that – we would know the other the way we know ourselves and v.v. We then live
in an environment of Belief as in (iii) above.
If
religion is not part of the law of Administration in America, then American
Government does not have the mandate to use Common American resources to fund
religion based equality. But all religious organizations in India or Sri Lanka
respectively could be rewarded on Equal Opportunity basis, to become more
democratic in their Administrative practices and/or all those who have American
parallels could be funded to protect their ‘freedom’. This includes majority
and is not limited to minority religions.
As
per the above report:
[The
state department also wants the applicants to come up with ideas to educate
civil society and journalists about legal protections for religious freedom, particularly for members of religious
minorities; document and report religious freedom violations to
authorities; and educate law enforcement on human rights standards.]
It
is actually the majority who have placed themselves in the prison of
materialism by using religion. Hence they need to be protected from political influence
from within their own religion – especially through unearned status which
blocks the pathway to the other’s soul.
Take
for example Buddhism foremost article in the Sri Lankan Constitution. If Buddha
Sasana were applied on war activities of Buddhists – then a Buddhist ought to
be able pardon a fellow Buddhist on the basis of an article in Buddha Sasana.
But under the principles governing Double Jeopardy Laws that person then cannot
be tried under any secular law for the same crime. The exception would be to
try through the authority of Dual Sovereignty Doctrine. The basis for this is
that the same act ought to have damaged the Sovereignty of more both structures
– religious as well as Common Sri Lankan in this instance.
A
mind that is driven by a Constitution that prevents Dual citizenship at policy level would have
difficulty accommodating Dual Sovereignty Doctrine to override Double Jeopardy
Law. Hence if the Sri Lankan soldier or the militant is tried as per their respective
religious laws they would be protected from being put through the provisions of
the secular system that they know very little about.
Sri
Lanka already has Customary Laws through which specific cultural groups are
heard at the public level. These are better understood by practitioners of
those customs than the secular laws that are imported largely for the purposes
of intellectual commonness with wider world. To use Roman Dutch or English law
on these folks is effectively – continuity of Colonial rule.
If
therefore religious customs are codified
by the Provinces as well as at National level in the case of Buddhism, which is part of the Constitution, Sri Lankans are
more likely to identify with each other
through the third dimension. Once tried and completed at the provincial level,
it cannot be reopened at National level
except in the case of Buddhists through laws that uphold Dual Sovereignty
Doctrine. This is the protection that the soldiers as well as militants get through
Federalism.
The
need in Sri Lanka is to release Buddhism to take its due place in all its
purity to support true believers. When this is done – the junior mind would
feel less tempted by ‘foreign’ benefits taken through invasion. Both sides in
the Sri Lankan war were tempted due to the mind jumping beyond its local boundaries due to this
temptation of money and quick status.
No comments:
Post a Comment