Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam – 17 February 2015
Indonesia – Demoting Itself
The news reports say ‘Bali’s Governor Made Pastika has called on Australians not to boycott
Bali and for the Australian Government to respect Indonesian law.’
Every true Australian will boycott all
places of Tourism in not only Bali but all places covered by Indonesian Law. The Australian Government does
respect Indonesian Law. It is the Indonesian Government that does not respect
Australian Law as an Equal and that therefore Australians are outside Indonesian jurisdiction. Any
Australian to be punished by Indonesians through a structured path as opposed to Natural path - has to be
covered by Regional or Global agreements and Conventions including UN
Conventions. Indonesian actions in killing Australians through its own local
laws is without such agreement or higher authority beyond its own.
Our
Prime Minister the Hon Tony Abbott said ‘I feel sick in the pit of my stomach about
what is possibly going to happen to these youngsters’. My heart went out to
him for being a ‘good prime minister’. The commonwealth of Australia in terms
of Human Resources has been strengthened by such feelings by the Prime Minister
including for migrants of this nation.
Gandhi boycotted British-made clothes during
his struggles for independence. Balinese need to appreciate that this is also
about the Sovereignty of Australians. Even at family levels – we do not have
the right to enter what we believe to be another’s home, without their approval
and we do not have the right to kill someone who has entered our home – except in
defence. Indonesia killing Australians without the authority of Higher Laws is
of the latter category. It is like sending Indonesian troops to kill
Australians in an Indonesian home. We entered with permission. We did not
trespass. We did not enter Indonesia for the purpose of illegal activities
against Indonesians. Hence the killing of these two Australians amounts to
Murder. Where the law is flawed it becomes the weapon for emotional expressions
of dislike. The suffering of Indonesians committing the same acts as
Australians would have different value in their minds due to the difference in forms
and paths of belief.
Yesterday, my attention was drawn to the
site Gaja
Wines - Buy at Berry Bros. & Rudd. I am a
teetotaler by culture. This does not mean that I look
down upon those who drink wine. I would however do my best to prevent excessive
use of wine in all places that are home to me and all groups that are family to
me. Where I cannot prevent consumption at the physical level – I would do more
to strengthen the mind of those to whom I feel connected – through my own
credits with the system of Truth – the best medicine for an unsteady mind.
A fellow Sri Lankan wrote ‘Gaja, Dr. H
thinks wine is very good for both
mental and physical health! Even Christ’s first miracle was changing
water into wine despite the drunkenness of his disciples at the wedding feast
in Cana.’
I responded as follows:
‘In my own way I think that wine or any
intoxicant – including sugar is good so long as we keep it within healthy
limits. To have wine to be active in service is confirmed by wine being served
by Christians in Church. It’s the parallel of sweet rice for Hindus. The brain
likewise needs to be balanced by limiting information to functional levels. If
we register someone praising us without disciplining us – from time to time –
we are likely to become unsteady / intoxicated. If we know that we do not need
it – just submit those excesses to the Lord.’
To the Australian mind, use of weapons by unauthorized
persons would be the parallel of drug offenses to Indonesians. The reason is
that our freedom to react with weapons has been denied and regulated through
Australian Legal system – to a much stronger level than in Indonesia or Sri
Lanka. The Australian Government invests strongly in such systems to protect
our freedom of movement. Those found
guilty of Terrorism through the Australian mind would therefore be punished
more deeply in those minds, than they would be by the Indonesian mind – that failed
to prevent Bali Bombing or Sri Lankan mind that failed to prevent the killings
through the ethnic war. Ultimately it is
the mind that punishes or gets punished. The law is only the pathway.
If
therefore these young Australians had consumed the drugs in Hindu temples of
Bali – at a time when Bali Hindu culture was based strongly on abstinence of
intoxicants, they would have earned the severest of punishments by Hindu Balinese.
Such punishment should not be in excess of the value of the Balinese mind that
was damaged. Indonesia has the moral
authority to give form to such punishment through special Balinese Customary
Laws and NOT through General Indonesian laws based largely on Muslim mind
structure. To the extent Balinese are naturally ‘free’ in terms of tourism
their laws need to be different to those of Mainland. Possession alone does not
confirm ownership. On the other hand, belief
without possession – physical or legal – is higher ownership. The former
then needs the approval of the latter to ‘use’ the land. Hence Indonesian
Government made up largely of Muslims needs to take its place as ‘user’ of
Hindu Bali and not take up authority as ‘owner’.
The applicability of Customary Laws to local populations was
respected by Dutch Rulers of Ceylon/Sri Lanka. Hence the law of Thesawalamai
for Jaffna Tamil Community that Sukumaran is part of. Myuran Sukumaran may not be conscious of this
structure. But to the extent he and/or his family feel included by the Tamil
community – this independent mind structure would influence his own thought process.
Ultimately – if he is ‘free’ of any guilt after balancing the actual damage caused – by serving
jail sentence – and yet is killed as if
he did not repent and compensate for damage caused to the minds of those who
believe Bali to be their home – his death places a curse on Indonesian Sovereignty. When
we are genuine – the effects happen through God’s system. To the extent we
become messengers of God – our efforts as if we are Chan and Sukumaran – would strengthen
our feelings of Sovereignty and also protect all communities that we feel part
of.
Death is a certainty for all of us. How we die confirms the Truth not only about
us but also about those involved in our death. Gandhi who deserved to die
naturally was killed by a Hindu Indian. Jesus was also killed by the Government of His
time. In both instances the individuals were killed due not only to their Truth
but their FEELINGS for their fellow men and women which influenced Them to
share their Truth to heal the minds that had been suppressed by servitude. The
killer as well as the killed are brought together through such high souls who
have surrendered their individuality to commonness. Their death therefore
surfaces the ‘outsider’ for whom also they died. Thus the killer’s status is
lowered to the bottom when such souls die due to the actions of others.
Chang and Sukumaran are not Jesus or
Gandhi. But as Christians they have the power of Jesus in them. In addition,
Sukumaran with his Sri Lankan Tamil origin carries the power of Gandhi in him –
to the extent that Community has invested in Gandhi’s path of Truth. I am part of that
community. Both men now represent their
families, Communities and Nation in real and natural terms. These are of
exponential values through family, community and national feelings. The parents
of these two young men have confirmed their family values through their open support
and always being there for the young ones. The Tamil Community has petitioned
against the death penalty. Australia as a nation is continuing to protect its Sovereignty in various ways. Killing these two men is killing those families, Communities and
Nation in the minds of the killers. Indonesia
has NOT suffered pain equivalent to death of its core values to punish these
individuals by death. If it goes ahead – even after knowing the FEELINGS of
Australians – Indonesia becomes an outsider to Australia and needs to be
demoted to the lowest ranks within the Global Community.
No comments:
Post a Comment