Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
01
September 2017
Buddhism
Foremost Law Breached by Sri Lankan Army
Chapter
II - Buddhism
[Buddhism
9. The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and
accordingly it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha
Sasana, while assuring to all religions the rights granted by Articles 10 and
14(1)(e).
Freedom
of thought, conscience and religion
10. Every person is entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion, including the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his
choice.
14. (1) Every citizen is entitled to –
(e)
the freedom, either by himself or in association with others, and either in
public or in private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship,
observance, practice or teaching;]
All
of the above are articles of the Sri Lankan Constitution. Anyone including an officer
of the Armed Forces who volunteers to pull the Hindu chariot – has to have the
essential qualification that s/he is a Hindu and needs to be ‘seen’ as a Hindu.
That is the way of the civilized. The reasoning allocated to the above outcome
is the Caste problem in an area where majority are of junior caste. An in-depth
study of the psyche of the junior castes who now feel ‘free’ of supervision by
their own, would confirm that they connect outcomes directly to ‘ownership’ –
as in ownership by possession/occupation. Unlawful occupation of others’
property is a serious threat in areas dominated by those who are disconnected
with leaders of higher mind structure. This was the reason why the LTTE
eliminated Political leaders who followed the intellectual pathway. This is
also the reason why the LTTE accepted money from Sinhalese to suppress Tamil
voters and to show ‘outcomes’ through possession. LTTE claimed to want a casteless society. They promoted
a society submissive to physical power.
Thunaivi
where I resided to share my wisdom in the way of the educated – confirmed this ‘natural
attitude’. Not only the senior castes in the above Atchuveli area which is not
too far from Valvettithurai – the homeland of the LTTE chiefs, but seniors in other
areas where youth of junior caste were empowered by militants – would face this
‘threat’ of takeover by junior castes when they are in majority. My recent
articles on this subject published at http://austms.blogspot.com.au/
including
under the heading ‘Security
of Thunaivi Folks & their Ownership Contribution’ refer to this inherent problem in
Northern Sri Lanka. Folks in this area tend to state ‘If the boys were here this would not have happened’. They said that
in Jaffna Courthouse when the rape and murder of Miss Vithya Sivaloganathan was
being heard. To my mind, they were leaving it to the ‘Boys’ to govern them and
the ‘Boys’ called it self-governance. The sad observation is that the educated
accepted this because the ‘Boys’ were hitting back at the Government.
As per my study – the junior castes have
their own order. They themselves discriminate within their groups to take
subjective power which is needed where money power is less than human power. Our
family temple is situated at the twin village of Sangarathai-Thunaivi. At the
request made by the folks, we did donate land for pathway to the main-road as well
as to construct a building for the Development Secretariat. But that building
is largely idle because most officers of the higher caste fear coming into that
area. A few older folks of Thunaivi – continue to carry forward their respect
for elders and the more educated folks from Vaddukoddai area. When relatives
referred to the folks of Thunaivi as ‘Nalam’ I got cross with them. But when
our cottage was stoned when I went to the Police, complaining against a young
guy who threatened to smash my face flat – our relatives said this was why they
say ‘Nalam, Nalam thaan’. I had no defence. In fact I better understood why
that lady needed to say that to herself
to keep away those who did not respect the higher mind. I did not and
was open to their emotional attacks – which often are unregulated due to lack
of education and interaction with the educated. They are usually driven by
effects and not causes.
Their
relationships are not as regulated as those of senior castes. So long as they
remain within themselves they would get even with each other. The problem
starts when ‘outsiders’ go in. That was the problem with the Vithya rape and
murder case also. Those driven by ‘outcomes’ tend to assume that the other wants
outcomes that they desire – as in the saying ‘when a woman says no she means
yes’. Even in the case of those
who say ‘If the Boys were here’ they say ‘No’ to war but ‘yes’ to the armed
supervisors. That is how the Army replaced the LTTE and pulled the chariot in
breach of Article 9 of the Constitution. They had the DUTY to facilitate Hindus
to practice order. They had no business taking over others’ heritage.
No comments:
Post a Comment