Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
21 February 2017
Time based Sovereignty
British Prime Minister Sir Winston
Churchill referred to Gandhi as the ‘half naked fakir’. That half naked fakir
toppled the mighty British empire through his simple Truth. Gandhi himself
dressed like the masses who suffered most due to ‘foreign’ rule. Those who are
driven by subjective power without having actually earned it – would tend to
use ‘loose’ information to deny credit to another. Information/Data needs to be
passed through common theory to be valuable to the persons with whom our
intelligence is shared. Doctorates are awarded to honor those who discover
their own theories. Doctorates for lesser work lead society that looks up to such persons towards
ignorance. As Dr. David Garlick of the University of NSW said to me many times ‘We are ignorant that we are ignorant’.
Mr. Basil Fernando who is ready to judge
the Caste system states in his Colombo Telegraph article ‘The Profound Impact Of Caste In Contemporary Sri Lanka’:
[It is an uncontroversial fact that the social
organization in pre-colonial Sri Lanka was based on the caste system…….. Punishment within the caste context has two
components. Firstly, the punishment meted out to people from lower castes is
disproportionate to the extreme. As it is taught through the Hindu myths, for
example, an untouchable who is not supposed to learn meditation and the
practices of yogis may be punished with death for doing so, as demonstrated in
the story of Sambuka, or an untouchable boy who is not supposed to learn
archery may have his thumb cut off for it.]
I learnt about the character Eklavya who seems to be the person being
referred to as Sambuka by the author – through Mahabharatham – which is my
Bible to learn about Political behavior. To me, the value derived from the Eklavya’s
story is that the higher skills in governance are learnt through the subjective
pathway – largely by attributing to our seniors for their discoveries and then
adding our own work to claim credit. In nations like Australia, with high level
of migrants and therefore multiculturalism, we need to give priority to zero
base subjective power – and hence merit base is used on level platform. Equal
Opportunity principles help us think at zero advantage level.
To understand and appreciate Eklavya’s
story, we need to go into the environment and the system of governance that
prevailed back then. The way a self-balancing place is considered to be Sovereign – a time period during which a
group within or beyond that land space would have been a Sovereign period. During
the time of Mahabharatham – the land demarcations were different to what they
are now. We cannot therefore apply today’s
rules in a particular nation, to judge the past when different measures were
used to determine rights and wrongs. Eklavya being accepted as Indian cannot be
judged through Sri Lankan. India and Sri Lanka were different nations back then
also – as recorded through Ramayanam. One has to take on the mind-structure of
Indian Government at that time to appreciate Ekalavya’s story.
Eklavya who was prince of tribal group did not qualify to be tutored by
Dronar – the guru of the Central Government of India – as per the rules of that
time. It’s not different to the Chief Minister of Northern Province not being
allocated equal status as the President of Sri Lanka. Karnan who was born
within the royal family but before his virgin mother was officially married –
was similarly denied such training and was not allowed to compete with Royal
Princes. It is not different to Sri Lankan Chartered Accountant being
considered to be of lower status than Australian Chartered Accountant. When I
highlighted my experience – in this regard, Mr. Basil Fernando demonstrated no identity
with this. Hence the ignorance continues.
Under the Subjective system which most
Academics are familiar with – hierarchical positioning is more important than
objectively verifiable outcomes. A Master enjoys high status towards
comfortable positioning – so that the student/servant does not need to learn
and produce all outcomes from zero base. Common belief/faith facilitates this
natural sharing of the system even though one is weaker than the other in
contributing to the core-purposes of the Institution. The fighting skills taught
to Royal princes therefore carried on this common faith – just like the
University system being higher than High School system. A high school student
may have greater knowledge in a particular subject than a University student –
but until one goes through the University system, this greater achievement is
not openly recognized. Under the subjective system the mind of the
father is part of the inheritance by the son and that of the mother is part of
the inheritance of the daughter. Under the system of Thesawalamai – when the
daughter got married and went to live with her husband’s family – she was given
dowry to complete the relationship and take it has her motivational Energy –
the same way we bring into this life the essence of our past – as genes. A
daughter who receives dowry takes rebirth and is free of attachment to her old
status and benefits. Likewise migrants when they leave their homeland and
settle down in another part of the world. Now that the Sri Lankan government is
awarding dual citizenship – those who return to Sri Lanka need to bring their
overseas experience as Energy and not directly apply it as status.
Race when used by members of majority race
is the parallel of the caste system of yesterday. Where the lower castes get
status through majority rule – they need to take rebirth and carry their
credits and debits of the past as net Energy which needs to be recognized and
not consciously used. At Energy level – be it positive or negative as per current
measures it’s Common and not particular. But those who are conscious of
positives or negatives would carry them in their conscious mind and use it to ‘judge’
without ensuring that the other person has earned to be judged by that measure
also. An Australian migrant who arrived in Australia before me and is part of
the ruling race – would tend to use that as seniority – especially if s/he does
not know about my contributions to that land. Hence the need for Equal
Opportunity which places a limit on the base – that we inherit and carry
forward. No express credit or debit could be allocated on the basis of
Nationality for this reason. Yet – the Australian Judiciary did not punish the
authorities – including Police Officers who labeled me as Sri Lankan despite my
claim that I was Australian for legal purposes. Likewise here in Sri Lanka – a divorced
woman is graded below another married woman despite her having married as per
the law. As a member of that profession
what has Mr. Basil Fernando done to eliminate this inequality from his current
profession?
Under Autocracy – we were allocated
specific positions by seniors. Under Democracy – we share the Truth for which
both sides need to take no merit as per their past. Project based management
also requires such approach whereas Programs show least objective outcomes but
are successful when the minds are connected. Caste system continues to be a
program in areas of Northern Sri Lanka and India – where the lower caste need
it. So long as it is not seen for official purposes and/or is complained about –
we need to accept it as heritage value.
Here in Vaddukkoddai, even though I am of
Farmer caste – I live with Toddy tapper community as part of them. I knew intuitively that the caste based
injustice contributed to the war – not only through Tamils but also Sinhalese. Hence
I became one of them to learn the Truth. Many older folks here demonstrate
respect for those of farmer caste – even though officially there is no caste
system any more. I am demonstrating through my own conduct – that the higher
caste also need to meet them half way – so they would become more democratic. If
I am successful in my living here – then my mission to prevent unjust wars has
been successfully completed.
Premature Democracy leads to infighting –
as those who were elected without the higher mind order would tend to use
reverse discrimination once they are in power. Our cleaner for example quietly
extended his duties to wash the Deity in the altar – which is part of the
duties of the Priest. I disciplined him
and said not to do the work of the Priest. Washing looks the same on the
outside. But the priest chants mantras and trains himself to focus on the Deity
and the minds of his elders whose Energies are carried through the Mantras and
other ceremonial expressions. I believe that the contribution my parents made
to this temple is still alive here and to the extent I believe in their
positive value – I invoke such powers.
Last year during Thai Pongal farmer’s
festival for example – young ones here upset me and I cancelled the planned
ceremonies. This year I was in Australia and the same young ones tapped into
our electricity system and played loud music again in the compound next to
ours. I reported the matter to Vaddukkoddai Police and one of my students within
the Police, undertook to warn them. Now the young ones do not loiter around the
temple and it feels beautiful. This was achieved not only by me but also the
confidence I felt in the knowledge that my father’s family carried high status in
this part of Northern Province. Without such value – there is no heritage. To
the extent caste facilitated the development of such heritage – it was of
positive value. Those doing manual work
would take orders from their own seniors. Hence the separation by LTTE which
led to development of skills that helped LTTE raise its status to that of the
Official Army. Yet within themselves they were highly disciplined. LTTE pathway
cannot be used by Politicians. So long as Democracy is working actively, we
need this separation – either between skills or races. Caste is based on
skills. One must not use abusers the judge the whole. Where caste is abused – my
solution has been active development of Democratic systems – often by foregoing
my earned status in current life. Where one idly criticizes – be it through
caste, race or class - one’s own mind structure becomes disorderly.
Like in higher education, one may ‘quote’
giving reference to Caste , Race or Class system but not use it as an active
measure in Democracy and v.v. when we adopt the Subjective system to quietly share.
One is a foreigner to the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment