Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam- 29 June 2016
‘More Equal Before the Law =
Separation After the Law’
I was thinking about the pollution by the
officer in uniform – ‘Pada Yathra to Kataragama begins from the North’ article by
itnnews.lk when I my attention was drawn
to the Island editorial headed ‘More
equal before law’. Paatha Yaathrai (Foot Pilgrimage) brings to my mind,
Saint Yoga Swami and Mahatma Gandhi both of whom have led my mind to Independence.
Hindus, like Indigenous Australians, consider Natural Elements to be sacred.
Land / Earth is one of them. To my mind,
they are vessels holding true Energies – positive as well as negative. Hence
Hindus do not wear shoes inside sacred places.
Kathirgamam, as per the family and
community legends I heard and believe in – was a place that would make its own
calls to the devotes of Skanda Murugan – the Tamil Deity. During the olden days
– there were no particular pathways leading to the Shrine in Southern Sri
Lanka. One had to travel through jungles and those who ‘had the call’ usually
walked. We have family members who did that ‘walk’. Saint Yoga Swami undertook
this travel and hence when I hear Paatha Yaathrai my mind pictures Swami. I was
called to Batticaloa for Tsunami Reconstruction work through this invisible
network of Swami’s devotees. I ended up submitting my report to the President –
with no effort on my part to go through the official process. Mankerni, the
area served by me was one of the villages where the Yoga Swami devotees stopped
during their Annual Paatha Yaathrai from North to South. The folks of Mankerni
were largely descendants of Veddas /
Indigenous Sri Lankans. I worked out their connection to Skanda Murugan’s
Consort – Valli of similar origin.
When I noticed the uniformed officer in the
group of above mentioned ‘Pada Yathra to Kataragama begins from the North’
article I was naturally upset because to my mind, that was indiscriminate mix
of two pathways. Using the fundamentals on which Prescriptive Title is
recognized in Sri Lanka, I wrote in my draft submission:
‘In a Court of Law legal Title ranks higher than Title by possession
– except when the possessor satisfies the requirements of Absolute Ownership Value with no recognition
whatsoever of another’s title in any form through any pathway. This kind of Absolute value is demonstrated
by full possession and complete independence OR adversity/opposition to any other
form of Title.’
Belief based Title is higher than the Legal Title when one
Believes through physical possession. Hence the Law of Prescriptive Title. The
more I think about it the more in awe I am of the minds that gave us this Law
during colonial rule. This law is the parallel of customary laws which were
given official and Equal recognition by the Dutch. But to be effective – they have
to be either Independent of the official pathway or be Adverse to the official
pathway. Tamil Eelam for example would have been valid if those claiming it
took the Independent pathway. Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976 confirmed the ‘Adverse
to’ Title which eventuated in Equal Opposition for Tamils in Parliament. I
state as follows about this exception allowed in the case of Prescriptive
Titles:
[The validity of
this exception is highlighted as follows by Hon Justice Saleem Marsoof, P.C., J. through Storer
Duraisamy Yogendra & Balasubramaniam Thavabalan Vs. Velupillai Tharmaratnam:
[The decision of five judges of this Court in the Rajendran Chettiar
case is not only binding on this Bench as it is presently constituted, but also
reflects the practice of Court both in England as well as in Sri Lanka. As Lord
Denning, M. R. observed in Salter Rex and Co. v. Ghosh [1971] 2 All ER 865 at
page 866 – “Lord Alverstone CJ was right
in logic but Lord Esher MR was right
in experience. Lord Esher MR’s test has always been applied in practice.”]
It is argued and submitted that the above principle applies also in
the case of Prescriptive Rights – where the Absolute value of Belief developed
through an independent or adverse pathway, is respected and recognized as being
of higher value than the legal title which often includes theory which may not
be applicable to local environments. It is submitted that Logic is relative
whereas Belief is Absolute in value. Where theory is practiced – the two would
meet at the destination.
To be accepted at that level – pure of legal logic – Experience
based Belief needs to stand on its own rights and not be relative to the logic
of any alternate system – in this instance legal title. It is submitted that to
be entitled to ownership through the logic based legal pathway – one does not
need Belief. Knowledge that one has satisfied the requirements of the legal
pathway alone is enough.
To claim Prescriptive rights on the other hand, one needs Belief
which is confirmed by wholesome possession – as in blind faith. It is submitted
that the facts before the Court were not
constructed to satisfy the above requirements of the law.
It is submitted that the Conflict between the Legal Title and the
Prescriptive Title is addressed by the Prescriptive Ordinance by requiring the claimant of Prescriptive Title
to have completed the pathway and have reached the Destination of Realised Ownership
It is submitted that one such requirement is to travel independent
of the Legal Titleholder. Hence the Requirement of Independence or Adversity.
Where the Claimant claims no knowledge whatsoever of the Legal Titleholder/s,
the requirement of Independence needs to be satisfied. Where the Claimant does confirm
knowledge of Legal Titleholder/s and their activities in relation to ownership
of the property – the requirement of Adversity needs to be satisfied. It is
submitted that the latter needs confirmation of Separation of Powers and
Consciousness of Equal & Opposite status. ]
One can be Equal before the Law as per
theory. But as per Belief – one is wholesome owner. Where the Belief developed
through shared space / culture – the two are taken as Equal in Parliament even
though one gets less votes than the other. Tamils hold such Equal Title due to Natural
Energies rising to demote Sinhalese who were not true to their Administrative
positions and who abused political powers by using authority without belief.
Wise Tamils would realize that Natural
Forces of Truth have awarded them Half share of Sri Lanka due to this ‘Adverse
to’ possession including through Vaddukoddai Resolution and through those who
believed that they were fighting to retain their homes which they believe/d is
/ was theirs by long and uninterrupted, undisturbed ‘possession’. Governments
that neglect remote areas and cultures – are naturally demoted by Natural
Forces – especially where they ‘enforce’ their powers on those who have become ‘outsiders’
in reality but are taken as ‘insiders’ by law/theory.
The editorial was with specific reference
to the ‘Bonds Issue’ by the Central Bank Governor who is a Tamil. The Editorial
states:
‘Spokesman
of the National Freedom Front (NFF) Mohammed Muzammil, one of the bitterest
critics of the government, has been arrested and remanded for allegedly
misusing a state-owned vehicle. Ven. Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera was arrested and
remanded for keeping a baby jumbo without a permit. He was later bailed out.
Leader of the Pivithuru Hela Urumaya Udaya Gammanpila has been arrested and
remanded over an alleged racket affecting the interests of an Australian.
The question is why no one has been arrested and remanded over the mega bond scams which are believed to have caused staggering losses to the tune of billions of rupees to the state coffers. President Maithripala Sirisena himself revealed on the eve of the last parliamentary election that when the first bond scam was brought to his notice he had called for the removal of Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran from that post. It boggles one’s mind why no special presidential commission was appointed to probe that allegation. How the President would have reacted if such a serious allegation had been levelled against a key Joint Opposition activist is not difficult to guess.’
To my mind – there is a simple answer – and
that is fear of Natural Justice demoting the current leaders if they demoted
Tamil leaders who are shows of Ethnic Reconciliation
or the consciousness that these leaders with global background are Believers in
their own Independent pathway.
The examples of those punished do not
include any leaders who were ‘outsiders’ to Politics and are Tamils with Global
experience. In some ways such Tamil Leaders have become ‘untouchables’.
Many members of the Tamil Community – would
comfort and heal themselves by seeing such leaders in power. If Mr. Mahendran
were to be treated roughly – that would put the clock back in terms of karma of
abuse of power by Sinhalese politicians. To many who see the big picture – Mr.
Mahendran the individual isn’t of any particular value. The POSITION he
accepted as a Political Appointee is confirmation that Tamil Administrators
were more true to their jobs than Sinhalese who were strongly influenced by
Politics.
The editor states:
[The general consensus is that the last
government was corrupt to the core and its members lined their pockets at the
expense of the public; that was one of the main reasons why the people got rid
of it.]
‘The Public did not ‘get rid of the last
government’. Truth did - through Tamils
of today as well as in the past to whom Sri Lanka is Home by Prescriptive Title.
Every time an Administrator Abandons her/his post to become a Politician and
the Citizen continues to do her/his duty through the other side of that
position – the power to Demote the officer who abandoned post is allocated to Citizen.
When even one believer uses that power, Manifestations happen to maintain the
Equilibrium of Truth. That is the Power of One. When the Prime Minister went to
Hindu Temples and did his Paatha Yaathrai – he would have acquired this Energy
which drives from within.
There are laws in Sri Lanka which can be
worked more by the likes of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe than by his
predecessors due to global consciousness. Those who use intuitive powers would
never fail themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment