Monday, 15 July 2019


Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

15 July  2019

The Immigrant’s Mind

SBS News Reports that - ‘Migrants don’t actually threaten Australian workers’ jobs, new analysis reveals. I already know this through my own experience. It would be easy for someone to say that a migrant from economically poorer county is better off in Australia because the dollar value of the income is greater. But the real value is the consolidated value of feeling of ownership; status and objectively measurable income such as money.

The ultimate reality is the feeling of ownership. Once we own – others work becomes ours – with or without money and status movements. As per a video clip sent by Tamil Diaspora leader Rajasingham Jayadevan , one who is connected to Universal Power has the capability of acquiring a loved one’s physical ailment as  hers/his. I know this through my own experience – largely as a mother. We believe in group prayers for this reason. Development of this common faith is essential in any family, institution and nation. Otherwise we merely coexist. I identified with this power and my own membership at that ultimate level after reading accounts of Swami Sathya Sai Baba’s miraculous healings – of mind and body.  Mine were largely mind related but from time to time I could identify with such sharing in the case of my grandchildren. Now I realize that when I have the pain – the other person is beginning to heal. This is the natural power of true Love.

I believe that my investment in higher education in Sri Lanka – which was not recognized here in Australia became a true power when I continued to work at the professional level even though I was paid much less than my White Australian counterpart – producing similar work. My supervisors who ‘filled’ that gap as per their influence within the organization became partners in that energy. Those who failed because I was not important to them – missed the opportunity to be co-owners. At the University of NSW I felt compelled to share my truth. When I left the University after feeling that I was still taken at lesser value – they became distant relatives who did not have the power I had, to protect the higher education values and hence were limited to their own powers which seriously damaged their reputation. Universities are the most apparent institutions through whom we share Universal powers. But every place where we  research and discover truth and then share such truth with others – is a University. This could be just an email or Facebook. But the sharing needs to be Truth and not mere data. The latter is the parallel of plagiarism at Universities.
As a migrant – I have actually cost employers less for professional outcomes which elevates Australian standards. My commitment to family as per my cultural beliefs – led o natural sharing of the ‘gap’ in benefits with those in my circle of faith. This is how the second generation of such migrants who have foregone at Equal level – earn much more than the first generation.  To many this is limited to family and community. To some  - it extends far beyond.

To the extent such seniors’ ownership power is stronger than that of those who work merely for money – Australia accumulates positive value through immigration. Mr Howard had negative value in this aspect and hence his dismissal by the electorate. His Sri Lankan parallels are Mr SWRD Bandaranaike and Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa. In all cases – they went against their own past as migrants. But the Land knows. The voter who feels ownership has the power to defeat such leaders.
When ‘White Only’ and  ‘Buddhism Foremost’ orders are enforced on other cultures – through the Constitution, we disconnect with those who live close to the land. A migrant true to her/himself would recognize that they damaged the opportunities from those to whom that land was sacred. White Australians are migrants who have the duty to uphold migrant pathways as being separate to indigenous pathways which tend to be ‘natural’ and therefore are close to Absolute value. Those who respect indigenous Australians as their seniors and elders share in that natural value. Likewise in Sri Lanka Buddhists are migrants. They have the duty to promote the migrant pathway and not assume natural powers that are held by Veddhas. The Sri Lankan constitution itself denies Indigenous Sri Lankans – the foremost place as Nature Worshippers. Hence the ethnic problems due to lack of respect to natural owners. There is no place for Prescription  Ordinance in the law books of Sri Lanka if there is no recognition of  right to governance through belief.
Some of us become true Australians by including the weaknesses of senior migrants as ours. In truth we are the seniors in human resources whereas those who occupied the senior positions before us become juniors. They are elevated to equal position by the system of Democracy. This requires Separation of Powers. Seniors often like to continue to be seniors and hence panic when there are increases in juniors.

Paying less than the worth of the work is to cheat common ownership. The result is ethnic conflict which is beyond the power of the government.

If Indigenous Australians and Sri Lankans had insisted on White Australians and Buddhists becoming hunters  and nature worshippers – there would have been no leadership positions for Mr Howard, Mr Banadaranaike or Mr Rajapaksa. Tomorrow’s leader may be of Indian culture  believing in the land called Australia or Tamil believing in the land called Sri Lanka. A country that produces this outcome – confirms success through democracy – as Americans did. Tamils becoming leading Opposition in Parliament of Sri Lanka – confirmed the true Democratic powers of Sri Lankans. By enforcing himself into that position, Mr Rajapaksa confirmed weaker democratic powers and hence the weakening of Governing  power of the Sri Lankan government. In effect the minds disconnected and hence the lack of Intelligence sharing through Natural Governance. Hence the Easter attacks were not prevented but were left to natural forces of avoidance of the unknown. Hence Mr Sirisena went into hiding – as did Mr Rajapaksa when the LTTE were defeated.



Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

14 July  2019

Separatism Or Separation of Powers?

Separatism at the primary level becomes destructive when combined indiscriminately with status of authority. Separation of Powers on the other hand is the confirmation of  Belief raised to the power of philosophy. The difference is one is seen only and the other is given form only when needed. At other times it exists as abstract.

DBS Jeyaraj for example states in his article headed : ‘How LTTE murdered senior Tamil leader Amirthalingam 30 years ago…’ , states as follows:

[The TULF that won 18 seats at the 1977 polls contesting on a separatist platform had been out of Parliament earlier for six years.] - http://www.dailymirror.lk/opinion/How-LTTE-murdered-senior-Tamil-leader-Amirthalingam-30-years-ago%E2%80%A6/172-171054
I always took the Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976 as a claim for Separation of Powers. But through the above, Mr Jeyaraj is confirming that he took it as ‘separatism platform’. When Tamil Political group won the position of Opposition in 1977 – it confirmed to me that the claimants and their supporters were seeking a declaration of Separation of Powers.
To my mind therefore – each time the community accepts leadership by armed group – they have separated from the path of the intellectual who is capable of carrying a discovery as abstract philosophy.

The problem for Tamil politicians was that they themselves failed to practice this Doctrine of Separation of Powers between themselves as politicians and the armed militants. Mr Yogeswaran, like Mr Wigneswaran – wanted to be popular with both sides. The  Assassination happened due to this internal weakness within the leading Tamil political group.  He exempted the LTTE  members from the ‘security checks’ . When LTTE that lived by the gun asked for exemption – Mr Yogeswaran ought to have been alerted – due to  the simple reason that the LTTE would not so exempt an opposition. Every diverse group is Opposition to majority group in a society. As in Prescriptive rights – the Separation of Powers  comes from being adverse. To my mind, THIS was the power that promoted Tamil Politicians who did not take an eye for an eye to Equal Opposition level in National Parliament.

Today we bought some toys in a Garage Sale here in Sydney. The happiness I felt when the toys were within our budget – was the same as when I buy for my grandchildren. The kids in Northern Sri Lanka who feel happy also become my grandchildren. We are diverse in our pathways. But to the extent the toys are affordable to the parents the extra cost becomes the Energy that binds us – as if they are our family. That is how exponential system works. But the two systems need to run parallel to each other and not meet to make one senior to the other.
Mr Jeyaraj  presents the problem as follows:
[Amirthalingam assured the Tigers that any political arrangement would give pride of place to the LTTE]

If Anglicans and Catholics merged – who would be the leader of Christians? LTTE would have become dysfunctional under Political leadership. Mr Amirthalingam ‘assumed’ that he was the ‘common leader’ the same way Mr Sirisena assumed that he as President was about the PM. But politically they exist as equals. Likewise Politicians and Armed militants who seek to be leaders. According to Mr Jeyaraj, this problem was presented by Prabhakaran as follows:
[LTTE supremo Prabhakaran had once used soccer parlance and remarked in Chennai that Yogeswaran was a man who “kicked same-side goals.]

The true structure that we develop would look different in the case of an armed leader to that of a political leader. Had Prabhakaran been democratic – he would have been killed at the early stages by someone who had stronger leadership ambitions than Prabhakaran. Likewise, Mr Amirthalingam would not have been recognized as National Leader of Tamils had he taken life for life and also joined LTTE to chase India from Sri Lanka through the armed process. Being grateful to those who groomed us is part of the essential criterion for us to step into the provider’s shoes. Lack of gratitude leads to attachment to the visible outcomes. The lesson to be learnt by Tamil youth is – if you disrespect your own gurus – you do not grow as tall as them. If you cannot follow – use an alternate path and travel parallel.

Saturday, 13 July 2019


Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

13 July  2019

Fundamental Rights Petitions

Today I learnt about two Fundamental Rights Petitions in Sri Lankan Courts – through Daily News. The first one was about the ‘pardon’ by President to Buddhist monk Gnanasara Thera. The other was about Easter bombings. In both instances – to my mind, the structure of the petitions – as stated do not confirm a valid Fundamental Rights complaint.

Simply stated – a Fundamental Right is the Judicial parallel of Declaration of Believe based ownership by the citizen. When I sued the then Prime Minister of Australia – Mr John Howard - on the basis of Racial Discrimination Act 1975, that was a fundamental rights matter. Fundamental Rights are those that we are born with.   But even the High Court – which is the Apex Court here in Australia – upheld that my complaint was frivolous. I then submitted my pain to God. This surrender helped me heal myself  by sharing my pain with fellow Australians. The fact that Mr Howard lost his seat eventually – confirmed to me that the system of Natural Justice delivers to those who believe in it. Fundamental Rights Court plays that role at human level. The Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976 is confirmation of such a declaration – which was upheld in 1977 when Tamils become Equal Opposition in National Parliament. To ask for Separate State after that was disrespectful of that the Court of Natural Justice.

I believe that my complaint was valid because by law I was entitled to be treated as an Equal to a fellow Australian – until known otherwise. Equal Footing to access Common Resources  is a Fundamental Right that every migrant is entitled to. Like in the caste system – those who have habitually taken senior positions due to their physical aspects – for example being White, would tend to take advantage of the easier pathway and take the migrant from an Aid-Receiving country/group  to be less than themselves. Unjust discrimination happens when the other person has  actually contributed more to the Commonness of the group and becomes the binding power. This becomes a fundamental rights judicial matter when the complainant  actually believes and practices the relevant law. Otherwise it is a matter for the Court of Natural Justice.

This complaint has been filed on the claim that the provisions of Article 12(1) of the Constitution have been breached.  As per the report ‘they sought a declaration that the petitioners fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 12(1) of the constitution have been violated.’
Article 12 (1) states:
[12. (1) All persons are equal before the law and are entitled to the equal protection of the law.]
The fact is that article 9 precedes article 12 and is more fundamental than article 12. Article 9 states:
[9. The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana, while assuring to all religions the rights granted by Articles 10 and 14(1)(e).]

One driven by Buddha Sasana more than by Common Law – would consider her/his fundamental rights to be at risk when the Common Law Judiciary punishes a Buddhist leader. It is the parallel of White Australia Policy  protection in Australia which was a reality when I sued Mr Howard. It would still be a reality in some parts of Australia but the likes of me have contributed to eliminating it through judicial action – despite knowing that I would be dismissed.

The Equal Opportunity law for minorities  in Australia is the parallel of Prescriptive Rights in the case of Land Ownership in Sri Lanka. Interesting to note that, President’s Counsel Faisz Mustapha is  appearing for the Petitioners in the Easter Sunday attack. President’s Counsel Faisz Mustapha  appears also for my opposition in a land rights matter. As per my belief in that ownership the party that Mr Mustapha defends filed a false declaration of ownership. Such ownership is proven by continuous occupation despite any challenges from the calculated ownership. The parallel of that prescriptive right is the right to protection of elected government.  In this instance the two officers are my parallels in the land matter. They have to be proven wrong through the calculated merit based pathway. The law for that is not Fundamental Rights law. The appropriate party is the elected member of government who is responsible for the Administration.  The victims did not have belief in the  officers concerned directly. Their belief is through the elected member who is Mr Sirisena. President  Sirisena represented that belief and also had the ultimate responsibility as Minister with Executive Powers.
In both cases – the wrongs have been confirmed by the persons concerned. Buddhist monk Gnanasara Thera has already confirmed the ceiling placed on commonness by promoting Sinhala only state. In the case of Easter Bombings it is a manifestation of the wrongs by Government Forces which takes the Armed Forces back to the frontline to fight against their equals – i.e. those who have abandoned the common pathway regulated by common law. So the Christian power is bringing Westerners in America to protect their own who have been abandoned by the Buddhist government.
Fundamental Rights cases need to be heard in a Neutral Court – towards which the Sri Lankan Judiciary would need to put itself through much Affirmative Action. Foremost is the need to recognize lay litigants on Equal Footing – for it is the lay person who represents the common law abiding citizen who practices the law not because s/he has to but because that is the pathway to harmony. Truth is above the law and it would show up the excesses in law at the practical level.
If we accept that God is the parallel of Truth – then that God takes different forms to each believer/group of believers. The god I recognize would meet my real needs. If the Big God is different – then to me that God is Maya. Likewise the ancestors who gave us the laws.
If Buddha is the personal god of Sri Lankans as per article 9 - articles 10 to 17  in Chapter III – headed Fundamental Rights – become a myth. Once Sri Lanka adopts UN laws – article 9 must become an invisible right – as happens in rebirth.
Until Australia included UN principles – the Sovereignty of the individual and belief based groups  was a myth. But by including those laws as our own – we knew the connection that our personal god (in the case of Australians Jesus Christ and therefore White Australian) was identical in qualities to the Big God (UN).

Until Article 9 is removed – Sri Lankan Judiciary is handicapped to serve and be empowered by non-Buddhists. Such fundamental rights actions highlight this irreconcilable ‘gap’ between us and wider world. But the moment we become independent of the fruits of that human system – we would start recognizing and appreciating the wonderful world of Truth – which produces the other side at the level the ceiling was placed – provided someone submitted to the Highest power. The manifestation would be in the language of that person and not necessarily in the official language/form – be it Sinhalese for the case against the President or language of law against the officers in the Easter Bombing case.

The changes are likely to happen through changes to the law – the way Gandhi is honoured at the University of NSW where I was punished for peaceful assembly.

Friday, 12 July 2019


Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
12 July  2019



Ranil – Disciple of Buddha?

This morning’s mail brought me the following message:

[Ranil Wickramasinghe, Prime Minister of Sri Lanka, made  a statement (below) praising the JVP even while the JVP was launching a no confidence motion against him and his government.
I have always believed this man is extraordinary and statesmanlike. 
He is slander-proof and praise-proof-much like the leader in the Dammapada. He stands unshaken and believes in what he does. He has no desire to amass fortune, not because he is rich on his own, but also because he has no inheritors to pass wealth onto. People slander him but he remains unruffled………………………………….
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has said whatever the political party heads the next Cabinet, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) must represent it. ]

To my mind, while Ranil is holding the position of Prime Minister – which has strong executive powers and not that of governor to ‘forgive’. Mr Sirisena forgave  Buddhist monk Gnansara Thero while he holds Executive Power as Minister of Defence. If they seek to be ‘soft individuals’ they need to renounce the Executive part of their leadership and follow Lord Buddha’s pathway and not Administer but facilitate the citizen to self-govern.

To the extent Ranil recognizes the importance of JVP in politics – he has the DUTY to recognize Tamil as well as Muslim militants in Sri Lanka also as being important contributors to the Parliament. They know the ground reality.

The writer who declares that Ranil is Dharmic goes on to refer to the following:
[Prime Minister replied on the floor of parliament to JVP leader’s questions during the NC debate;
“There is no sofa. Sofas will be available in the lounge out there.”
He said discussions were going round regarding updating the SOFA agreement entered into by Gota. They will next be presented for cabinet approval and from there to parliament for approval. Right now there is no SOFA.]

SOFA – Status Of Forces Agreement – with the USA is at the centre of discussions in parliament. The question is ‘what would it mean to the common Sri Lankan?’

The above writer whose work is regularly published by the official media, states:

[What a magnanimous leader Ranil is to praise the JVP as having honest leaders and the party as being a disciplined one! Ranil said he hoped the JVP will be in cabinet when the next government is formed-whoever wins government. 
I have always held that Ranil is the only statesman Sri Lanka has]

But a deeper study would confirm that Ranil is giving the message that it would be more convenient to tap the intelligence of the JVP and therefore ‘would be militants’ if they were part of the government. The clue is in the following:

[A team of US counter-terrorism experts is reported to have stressed at a meeting with Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe the need for stricter border control and coast guard to ward off terrorism.
The team led by US Ambassador Alaina B. Teplitz called on the Prime Minister on Tuesday evening and briefed him about measures taken by them to counter terrorism after the 9/11 attack. They said terrorists would fear any attempt to infiltrate a country whenever there was rigid border control and coast guard.
The Prime Minister reportedly informed them that the government was planning to establish a counter-terrorism centre to coordinate intelligence operations and take action.]
According to a source privy to talks, the US experts said that they had practical difficulties in trying the terrorist suspects, arrested after the 9/11 attack, in civil courts. They said terrorism was not a normal crime to be tried through the ordinary civilian court system, and therefore they had special arrangements to prosecute such suspects.]

Most of the militants tend to be ignorant of the law. Hence when they are punished by law enforcement authorities – such authorities would seem alien to them. It would be difficult to try them in civil courts through laws that are for those who accept the authority of the government and the judiciary to administer and punish them. Suicide bombers confirm that they protect themselves from such leadership that they do not believe in.

I learnt about this mental order by living as part of the village of toddy tappers in Northern Sri Lanka. When I complained to the police against some youth – after my roof was stoned, one of them explained that it happened to all of them regularly – when they went against someone. That is their way of protesting against such discipline.  As per Dharma a leader must feel that the one being disciplined is part of her/himself. When such a leader is seriously hurt by the junior – to the extent that junior is out of the circle of belief of the apparent senior – the leader would tend to punish the offender excessively. Hence Americans need special system to try those who are by law insiders but as per truth are outsiders.

In Sri Lanka – by law Non-Buddhists are outsiders to Buddhists. The reason is article 9 which allocates senior position to Buddhism. To many the value  may be just the paper that it is written on. The Government prosecutor asked me in relation to trespass – whether I considered the ruling by then Vice Chancellor Professor Wainwright – to be not worth anything more than the paper the order was written on? The order was for me not to come into the University of NSW to seek to speak to the Vice Chancellor. To me when I did so seek – it was an act of Peaceful Protest. But to Professor Wainwright – it was vastly different to the unwritten internal autocratic laws of obedience that he was used to – especially from migrants driven by money and status as quickly as possible. He thus became the militant whilst I was well within the law. But I had to lose my hard-earned status to prevent militancy. The University in turn became more aware of the ‘terrorism’ problem including through Sri Lankan student – Nizamdeen.

On  01 November 2004 – Gandhi himself confirmed his blessings of my work to uphold my truth at the University of NSW. This was manifested by Dr Peter Vaux who stated that I was following in the footsteps of Gandhi. I was sent to the Prince of Wales hospital to be assessed for mental illness. Later I found out that Daily News (Sri Lanka) published on the same day my response to Justice Weeramantry on the Relevance of Ahimsa. http://archives.dailynews.lk/2004/11/01/fea03.html

That was how I learnt  directly through the system of truth that Gandhi had blessed me. Back then I was sent to prison. But since 2012, that very University of UNSW started celebrating Gandhi day – as if they are the custodians of  the power of Gandhi Power! Each time they do that without making amends – they curse themselves. That is how militants become Terrorists at the University of NSW. Our wrongs become sins if they are not corrected under current structures  including through compensation to the victims. Correction and compensation including taking junior position to the victim – leads to sharing pain and therefore becoming one. Until then the wrong remains – as negative energy to make militants look like terrorists.

One such orator at the UNSW - Peter Greste, the Australian journalist jailed on confected terrorism charges in Egypt, to my mind has been blessed by Gandhi. Peter stated during his UNSW Gandhi oration in 2016 :

[As I discovered in Egypt’s prison system, a lot of radicals who support Islamic State want a war.]

Those who punish radicals need to have the authority of their truth to do so. When the punisher carries preconceived prejudices against the punished – and the punished is Not guilty as charged – the punishment returns to the punisher.  Peter explains it was follows:

[But, Gandhi went on: “If the control is from without, it proves more poisonous than want of control. It can be profitable only when exercised from within.]

To the genuine militant, the power of the law is foreign power. Unless therefore the punisher feels the pain of punishment  as if the punished is part of her/himself – it is better to not have that power to punish and/or have the law that measures rights and wrongs.

While journalists reward or punish politicians through their own published work – for which Peter was punished in Egypt – they need to make politicians ‘internal’ . That is when their work becomes valuable to the whole. Citizens who are part of the government would be named Freedom Fighters – whilst those who are ‘outsiders’ would be named Terrorists. Peter presents this as follows:

[Even the word “terrorist” is a problem. The BBC tells its journalists never to use the “T” word in their reporting because of the old cliché “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”. And if our reporting is to be genuinely neutral and fair we’ve got to stick to that difficult middle ground in the words we use.]

That is how JVP is included in government by the Sri Lankan Prime Minister  but LTTE remain terrorists. To the extent Tamil Community shared their credits and included militants – they would feel the ‘terrorism’ accusation to be theirs. To the extent the Government does not feel that pain – it gets separated from that community. How can the government then be relied upon to operate under Unitary structure?

Peter quotes Gandhi again :
[As Mahatma Gandhi once said: “In a true democracy, every man and woman is taught to think for himself or herself.”]

Likewise every institution – starting with Universities. Except for Peter, I could not find any other UNSW Gandhi Orator – I could identify with. Many produce hearsay effect; some contribute to intellectual development; but only a few have the Gandhi experience. They bring Gandhi power by experiencing Gandhi pain at that place. In Peter’s case he experienced it in Egypt and is bringing the lessons to UNSW Australia as positive energy.

Finally – when Ranil declares LTTE’s value as being parallel to JVP – then to my mind he is following Buddha. Ranil failed to uphold Tamil Political Leadership in Parliament despite getting Tamil support to reinstate him. That confirmed lack of investment in Democracy.

Thursday, 11 July 2019


Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

11 July  2019

Big Brother America or mortal sin from Sri Lankan Government? 

Sri Lanka has gradually become close relation of America – not only through government but more through  individuals and families who have emigrated from Sri Lanka to America. Former Defence Secretary Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa is such an example. When the Government of America strongly criticised the Sri Lankan government in relation to war-crimes that was also a demotion of Mr  Gotabaya Rajapaksa as an American. Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa then had the option of finding fault with himself to feel better as American. Instead he is using Sri Lankan politics to abandon his own investment in America. It is abuse of immigration system that is naturally shared with all those who support him and/or accept his support.

Those who seem to be blind to all this includes Mr Vasudeva Nanayakkara:
[- Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe wanted anti-Muslim riots to create 10,000 refugees and bring the US military and United Nations interventions to Sri Lanka's Vasudeva Nanayakkara claimed in parliament.
"Using this crisis he wanted to bring the United States military to Sri Lanka," Nanayakkara said.
"They are salivating to come to Sri Lanka (kela hala hala innawar)."……..
Nanayakkara,  a leftist legislator aligned with ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa claimed that Wickremesinghe wanted to generate 10,000 Muslim refugees in areas where Sinhalese lived and drive them all to the Eastern Province.
Some had charged that activists linked to the so-called 'Pohottuwa' party, were behind some of the anti-Muslim riots in May.
Nanayakkara said the Wickremesinghe also wanted to bring the United Nations to Sri Lanka.
The UN High Commissioner for Refugees would also have intervened in Sri Lanka, Nanayakkara said.
"They (foreign powers) are waiting to intervene on the basis of R2P (responsibility to protect)," Nanayakkkara said.
"That is what Ranil wanted."] Economy Next report ‘Ranil wanted anti-Muslim riots to bring US military to Sri Lanka: Vasudeva’

If America is good investment for Mr Nanayakkara’s guru’s family,  simple logic says that Sri Lanka is good investment for Americans and other Westerners. The deservedness is equal in a free environment. The government that ‘freed itself’ from global obligations in the war against the Tamil Tigers activates such quid-pro quos. This is a natural energy that  goes with the person and adds itself to all activities of that person.

Mr Nanayakkara for example is related by marriage to Mr Wigneswaran. But neither presents the Common Sri Lankan form in Politics. They are either not leaders of their common family or they have given up on their family life. If latter – it needs to be expressly shown to the public they claim to lead.

Mr Wickremesinghe who qualifies more strongly than Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa to be American – is reported to have reasoned as follows:
[Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said an exchange of notes had taken place on a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) in 1995 and an Acquisition and cross Servicing Agreement agreement had been signed when Gothabaya Rajapaksa, a US citizen was Sri Lanka's defence secretary.
There was no new SOFA agrement, he said though talks had taken place on changing some clauses. If there is a new sofa which he did not know about, it must be in the living room, he said.]
So who brought the American Forces into Sri Lanka first ? – Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa. An internal person uses indicators while an external person needs objective proof. Hence Key Performance Indicators in Management and proof in Audits. As a lone person I upheld Sri Lankan dignity when I explained the difference to the NSW Auditor  General (Appendix)

Deeper than the internal indicators is the energy one carries from the past – as sins and virtues shown in horoscopes. So long as we are responsible for someone else’s true pain and damage to that person’s natural sovereignty – we carry sin/negative energy into our next chapter/life. Surface readers often do not know that they carry this – which may be positive or negative to the person in the current environment. The Dual Citizenship ban for policy makers prevents activation of this energy that was developed in a different  environment – i.e. structure. In nature we have no active memory of our past life. Like genes – this Energy is passive but naturally merges when our mind is dependent  in the present time.  When there is no one to depend on – the mind depends on the past. A good example is Mr Wigneswaran carrying  the Judicial status after he became Chief Minister.

I have observed this in the folks of Vaddukoddai in relation to Caste. Those who use the junior worker beyond the work related relationship would be using some kind of past inappropriately.  This is the common basis for all Equal Opportunity laws. In Vaddukoddai it is Caste. In Southern Sri Lanka – it is Race due to Sinhala majority forming government without accountability to the Common Sri Lankan who may be more sovereign than the government. I believe I am here in Australia. As per the laws of Nature – when we abuse and the other person in the relationship is actually deserving of senior position due to deeper contribution to commonness – they have the power to return the punishment to us. When they hurt we are cursed. In turn we become junior-most in our own environments. We acquire the very characteristics / genes that we unjustly accused the other of. Likewise, when juniors rebel those of us who have included them as part of ourselves would have the insight to identify with the weakness that they themselves are not able ‘see’ in themselves. Through common activities that they able to participate in – those with positive energy transform such persons. But that is the hardest pathway and it carries the risk of us being taken over by juniors if we allow ourselves to be ‘friends’ with them rather than taking our structural position as seniors.
In effect – the Rajapaksa family that has disrespected the philosophy underpinning Dual Citizenship ‘imported’ American power through themselves – long before 2015.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix
Re Public challenge of misleading statements of principles by the New South Wales (Australia) Auditor General Mr. Bob Sendt:
Mr. Sendt wrote on 20 November 2003 in response to my Public demand for him to pay his Dues as an Accountant::
Ms Param, I fully understand that auditors are not to participate in the management of the entities they audit. That is basic. What I said in my report is that external financial reports only give a partial view of the performance of many public entities. Such entities are not established to earn a profit or a return on assets, but to provide services to the public. So to give a true and fair view of how well they are providing services, they also produce non-financial performance indicators. If financial reports are required to be audited – to give the public confidence in their accuracy – then so too should the performance indicators. I fail to see how you can state that this is participating in the management of the entity.
Bob Sendt
NSW Auditor General

My response to the above indicates the deep wisdom I have in Audit and Compliance, largely based on my Sri Lankan training:

Thank you Mr. Sendt for  the prompt response. Most progressive organizations produce both – Financial and Non-Financial Performance Indicators. They  are both for MANAGEMENT purposes and reflect the THINKING and WORK_IN_PROGRESS. If you use Performance Indicators – then you are thinking with them. This is like the Executive Government participating in the Judicial process. Your Non-Financial Reports are the Legal records that these organizations are required to maintain – such as the Recruitment and Employee Assessment records. Where there is a big gap between Law and Practice – it requires YOUR staff to do the additional work. Taking the Performance Indicators distracts you away from this work. It is in breach of the Doctrine of Separation of  Powers. These organizations must be allowed to confidentially do the cooking and it’s up to your staff to do the spy work from the finished product to the LAW and not to their dreams and goals. You are seeking the short path because your staff are not trained to find out from the client staff what is going on. Staff often ‘hide’ information from you because you are third party. So they should. That way your staff would improve their skills. Using client-staff’s work-in-progress deters your staff from thinking through their own specialty = AUDIT on the basis of existing LAW. Then we would become a uniform society instead of a diverse society challenging each other – you within the existing law and the operational staff towards tomorrow’s laws. Challenging leads to creativity – as you can see from me. Gandhi also said that the night he was thrown out of the first class compartment of the South African RAILWAYS was his most creative experience.

You need to get the client organization to publish their non-financial reports that are mandatorily maintained. Public service organizations primarily make goodwill. This can also be positive or negative – profits or losses. They are collected together and are balanced with the total costs through Common Funds. It will be useful for you to develop a standard dollar value for these legal requirements so the People can SEE and know the Truth. Your role is not to help them make a profit but to report whether they are and how much. How about doing one on UNSW? Or State Rail?
Thank you again for responding. It has helped deeply.
Regards,
Gaja


Wednesday, 10 July 2019



Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

10 July  2019

Multicultural Tamil Politics
While reading the contents of the communication  headed ‘Gajendrakumar Ponnampalam's Statement - Response by Justice C.V.Wigneswaran - 09.07.2019’ I received the email headed ‘TripAdvisor - Certificate of Excellence 2019’ from Jetwing Management. I quickly looked through the list  at http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/1152271/9396f52098/ARCHIVE#like and was happy to note that both – Jetwing Jaffna as well as North Gate by Jetwing at Martin Road – Jaffna, where I lived during my school days – were included. It felt as if I had been recognized by the Customer Agency. To me the timing meant that Jaffna has the capacity to become world-class in Customer Service.
On that basis – let us evaluate the dissatisfaction expressed by Mr Wigneswaran about the Political Management in Jaffna. The various components of our Services need to be broken down – as we breakdown programs into projects in Democratic Resource Management. Tamil Congress in this instance represents one aspect while Mr Wigneswaran’s group represents another – just like Lord Muruga and Lord Ganesh do in Hindu structure. When there is no commonness in form in Hinduism -  the religion of majority Tamils of  Sri Lanka – it is unwise and unreliable to expect One political form to represent them. Buddhists who follow only Buddha, in contrast are entitled to expect one form. Not Hindus. To us – it is multicultural to formless philosophy. Multi political group to formless governance.
The three main criteria  through which the review is structured are – Communication, Accuracy and Value:
Communication – Mr Wigneswaran has complained that Mr Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam – the leader of All Ceylon Tamil Congress failed to respond to his written communication regarding unity within various Political Parties in Northern  Province. To what extent does Mr Wigneswaran himself respond to communications that are written to him and/or are published about the Common Tamil Politician? Between Jetwing and the Common Tamil Politician – there is a huge ‘gap’ in this area  - most of which is irreconcilable. That is also the gap between the self-managing  Common Tamil citizen and the Common elected representative. To the extent Mr Wigneswaran remained silent – when he had the opportunity to respond as the Common Politician, he also contributed to the gap. Communication between the Supplier and the Customer is an essential contribution to development of Common ownership.
Accuracy – Mr Wigneswaran has complained that his political group has been accused of including Indians. If it is Indian Intelligence – the Indian component is part of including LTTE and other militant groups that were resourced by India. Mr Wigneswaran contradicts himself by stating that he has not expressly included Indians in his work / contributions but states that he hopes that India would provide support. Is India part of the structure or not? If not – expressions of expectations of support from India become invalid. Indian support needs to be escalated to invisible regional level based on Common cultural belief. How India preserves this commonness is up to India. If current India fails – Lord Vishnu would play that role through a person/group common to India and Sri Lanka – for example Swami Sai Baba or Lord Buddha.
Orderliness: Mr Wigneswaran has referred to LTTE leader Prabakaran as ‘Thambi’ in addition to referring to Mr Ponnambalam as Thambi (younger brother). The pathway shown  by LTTE founder was outcome based. Not so the founder of All Ceylon Tamil Congress – the Hon GG Ponnambalam from whom Mr Gajendrakumar has inherited the Party Leadership. The difference between the two founders is the same as the difference between a Hindu driven by showing rituals and the Hindu philosopher. The contribution indiscriminately mixes the two groups and is of negative value.
Value – The apparent value to Mr Wigneswaran would be the status as service provider. The value to the reader / customer would be determined by each person whose resources are allocated to reading and comprehending the message. This certainly is NOT the average citizen currently living in Northern Province. That  average citizen would tend to like or dislike the fact that there are differences between Mr Wigneswaran and Mr Ponnambalam. If it is age related – then those who experience the parallels with their children have nothing to learn from studying the communication. It would have been more productive if Mr Wigneswaran had written some advice to Court Administrators to whom he would still be their judicial senior/parent.

As a Tamil of Jaffna origin – I received super-host status just yesterday, for my Airbnb hosting services. I earned 5 star rating in all aspects but 4 star for ‘value’ from 5% of my customers – due to the noise pollution from the traffic in this area – which is beyond my control. The  5 star rating by 95% is enough to strengthen my confidence as a Trainer in similar services including through regular reviews. It’s time Mr Wigneswaran put himself through such a process with the Public he claims to serve. Likewise Dr Raghavan who has become a slower communicator  than he was when he assumed responsibility as Governor.  At this rate – the Working People are likely to sideline government and operate as private citizens – leaving the welfare groups to be managed by Politicians or v.v.



Gajalakshmi Paramasivam

10 July  2019

Australian Invasion of Jaffna?
All reliable laws would begin with truth and end with truth. Governance related laws need to likewise begin with Sovereignty and end with Sovereignty.
Our actions confirm the governance structure in our mind. When I therefore read the headlines ‘Strong support for Julian Assange at Sri Lanka’s Jaffna University at
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/07/09/asan-j09.html  , I was alarmed. The article includes the following passage:
[The war-ravaged northern and eastern provinces are still under military occupation. Students at Jaffna University are frequently subjected to repressive measures and political witchhunts.
Campaigners displayed a banner with the slogan “Release Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning!” at the university entrance and organized a literature table. They distributed hundreds of copies of the WSWS statement: “For  worldwide campaign to prevent Julian Assange’s rendition to the US!]

I also wrote publicly about what I felt was the duty of Australian government in relation to fellow Australian Julian Assange. That is the way with family. This was shared with University of Jaffna through those who have undertaken to develop common structures. This includes regularly – Governor Dr Raghavan who represents the President , Mr CV Wigneswaran – the only Chief Minister Northern Province elected and Dr Kumaravadivel Guruparan  - head of law at University of Jaffna who is also active in politics. But none of them demonstrated interest in Julian. Nilantha Ilangamuwa – editor Sri Lanka Guardian did – in essence stating that it was a powerful message. That went to the core power that would ultimately raise the issue to higher levels through People – so Americans would share their feelings with the government. This is the essence of the heritage we have from Poosala Nayanar about which heritage I wrote as follows yesterday:
[The note is a complaint against three youths who loitered in temple area as if it were ‘public’ property. I have suggested that their family welfare handouts  be curtailed because we the victims are ‘tax-payers’. The person to whom I wrote has full knowledge of my investment in education in that area and that Australian Tamil Management Service under which we conduct training was linked to UTS-Insearch. To me this confirms the parallel of the Indian Minister’s elephant legend. My one is known as ‘The temple in our heart’ by Poosala Nayanar.  ]
Wikipedia reports as follows:
[Pusalar was a Shaiva, a devotee of the god Shiva. He wanted to create a grand temple for Shiva, but did not have the money to do so. Thus, Pusalar decided to build a temple to Shiva in his mind . He followed the rituals of temple-building, sanctified the ground and lay the first stone of his mind temple on an auspicious day. Over course of time, he completed his mind temple and selected a holy day for the Kumbhabhishekam ceremony, when the temple is consecrated and the image of God installed in the garbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum).
The Pallava king Kadavarkon had just completed a grand Shiva temple in the capital Kanchipuram and selected the same day for consecration of his temple. Shiva appeared in the king's dream and instructed him to postpone the date of consecration as He would be journeying to Thiruninravur for the consecration of His devotee Pusalar's temple on the same day. The king postponed the date as per the divine decree and hastened to see the magnificent temple of Pusalar, which Shiva favoured over his own. However, on reaching Thiruninravur, the king could find any stone temple visible in the town and was perflexed. He reached Pusalar's house and informed Pusalar about his dream. The saint revealed that the temple existed in his heart. The king was astonished by Pusalar's devotion and bowed down to him and worshipped him. Pusalar consecrated the temple on the ordained day and continued his worship until his death, when he is said to have attained Kailash, the abode of Shiva.]
In essence – the lesson I learnt is that when we ‘believe’ the form happens when we feel a need. The form happens as per the appropriate structure developed by the People of that area. In the above legend – it was Ruler Kadavarkon, whose rule was to show highest structure to the consolidated truth of the land over which he had ruling power . The King/Queen  Energy that would work the temple was the ascetic Pusalar whose role was to show least external value. The parallel of that in the case of the University of Jaffna is the Governing Body which needs to be empowered by true powers for it to be functional as claimed. My contribution to University self-governance is confirmed through my book ‘Naan Australian’ which is part of the collection by the Library of the University of Jaffna also. In chapter 27, I have included my published article written towards strengthening the self-governing powers of the University of Jaffna. http://www.austms.org/other_pdfs/EO_Dissent-n-Opposition.pdf
That is my parallel of Pusala Nayanar’s contribution to building Lord Shiva’s temple. It is the type of work needed to be done by a University to develop the Energy needed to Research and find the truth and share that truth through teaching activities. Repetitive learners would tend to use it for living and therefore would require firm and reliable structures. Deep learners would identity with any opportunity and the whole world becomes their University.

Through direct experience, I believe that the University of Jaffna needs firm structures – especially after militancy. They have confirmed this due to lack of identification with my work in publishing the truth that I discovered.  It was inappropriate that they would share their identity with Julian Assange with whom they share very little  common belief.  Julian is in trouble precisely for sharing something that he himself was not part of. Experience gives us the right to publish. Hearsay is imaginary and has very short life.

 My belief in the Australian University system – to my mind contributed towards the manifestation of  UTS-Insearch in Sri Lanka. It’s a pity that University of Jaffna has not earned that contribution to become Sri Lankan first before becoming Australian. Without deep belief in the issue or structured merger – this kind of ‘show’ – to my mind confirms frivolity.