Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
17
August 2018
Foreign Judgment for
Governor General
When someone in high position
is praised or criticized, we the ordinary citizens identify with it or reject
it as false. Some feel urged to actively
participate. Our genuine identity through observation adds Energy to the issue.
Our current work on that basis forms true network through which common Energies
have passage.
Yesterday, I heard
that our former Governor General Dr Hollingworth is being re-examined as an
Administrator by the current system. I totally reject this. The directly
affected victims have every right to question the perpetrators during the
common lifetime of both – as happened in the case of President Clinton. The
victim of Dr Holllingworh’s negligence had every right to initiate action while Dr
Hollingworth was in that position within that institution. But once Dr.
Holligworth stepped out of that position
– there is no jurisdiction to try him. The position carries that liability and
not the individual.
A position is part of
a structure with internal borders. The borders confirm regulations and
therefore order. An individual who follows the regulations confirmed by he/his
position, is taken as having satisfactorily raised her/his work and conduct to
the level of the Institution. Most of us do use ‘discretionary’ powers to make
decisions – including whether to act or not to act – while we are in certain
positions. Those who had the endorsement of their institutions while in
positions – are immune from prosecution including for decisions made through
the use of discretionary powers. The Judiciary enjoys this; lawyers also enjoy
this in Australia. Meridian
law firm has published the following about this principle:
[The High Court was
unanimous in its decision to reaffirm advocate’s immunity and refusal to
overrule its previous decisions in Giannerelli and D’Orta. In addition to
determining that the rationale underlying those decisions remained sound, the
majority made it clear that to overrule its previous decisions would “generate a legitimate sense of injustice in
those who have not pursued claims or have compromised or lost cases by
reference to the state of the law as settled by those authorities“. The
majority stated that a decision to abolish advocate’s immunity was one “best
left to the legislature.”]
It’s that sense of injustice that would be invoked in others –
that makes it wrong for us as a society. I
took then Prime Minister Mr John Howard to court after the Judiciary ‘failed
me’ in terms of action against the Vice Chancellor of the University of NSW. In that instance – the Police blindly
followed the Vice Chancellor’s instructions and punished me unlawfully. I
escalated the matter step by step despite the deep pain / agony I felt. One of
the individuals who comforted me by recognizing and identifying with my pain
back then was Dr. Hollingworth. Through such identification, Dr Holligworth
became entitled to my natural credits in the common system. At all times, I
stayed within my Truth. I expected of Mr Howard as my grand-senior by position
to use his True knowledge of the system – to do something. I expected only to
the extent I did in my parallel position of senior and grand-senior. When Mr
Howard was eventually dismissed by his own electorate – it confirmed to me that
my Truth also contributed to that outcome. Not mine alone but mine also.
By finding fault with Dr Hollingworth who no longer holds
that Administrative position , the
Police are invoking their own karma in parallel experiences. This system would not withstand such reverse
actions. This is why one needs to ‘die’ and take rebirth through one’s own
Truth. Restructures on the basis of Truth immunize the institutions concerned.
The Church also has gone through such purification. Likewise
the Australian Government – as we witnessed this week when both sides in National
Parliament came together to condemn Senator Fraser Anning. If not for Parliamentary
privilege Senator Fraser Anning would be
open to legal action through Racial Discrimination Act 1975.
Sometimes we do have instances when the laws do not lead us to global forms of
Truth. For example, the Buddhism foremost article in Sri Lankan Constitution
confirms Constitutional Autocracy – which is the current reality of that
Parliament. The Parliament is the highest institution of Sovereignty and hence
being in the Truth is more important than getting the ‘right ticks’ as per
external laws. Hence the immunity from prosecution to leaders of those groups.
Those of us who have
used our discretionary powers to uphold the values of the institutions are
immune from prosecution. Dr. Hollingworth is one of them. He was bullied into
stepping down from his position of Governor General. Now he is being threatened
with Administrative action for wrongs in previous life. Wrongs become sins when
they are not corrected by their current structures in which those wrongs
happened. Every Sovereign person is entitled to immunity from prosecution once
a wrong has gone past its valid period and/or place. Countries extradite
persons of wrong-doing to their home nations – due to recognition of
Sovereignty of that person and the responsibility of that Nation. Sri Lankan
government rejected ‘Foreign’ judges inquiring into allegations of war-crimes
for the same reason. One becomes foreigner due to Time also. Jesus after
resurrection was foreigner to the one who punished Jesus.
If Dr Hollingworth is
therefore ‘Administered’ after 4 resurrections – that confirms that the Police
have become Obsolete by living in the past. All our investments in Equal
Opportunity principles and laws are then flushed down the drain or the Police
have the duty to take action against Mr Howard for his failures to uphold Racial Discrimination Act 1975, when I
complained against him. I accepted his dismissal as the punishment as per the
system of Truth. Otherwise I conclude that the Police have different guidelines
for different status people. That could happen due to belated realization of
their own wrong doing. By finding fault with Dr Hollingworth – they find fault
with their own excesses with Indigenous Australians.
Administrators have
the responsibility to act as per current pain by direct actions using current
measures. By letting the genie out of the bottle they are awakening their own
past.
No comments:
Post a Comment