05 April 2024
Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
KACHATHEEVU
IS COMMON
SOVEREIGN
TERRITORY
Authority over Kachatheevu is yet again a political
issue. As per the Decan Herald article ‘Reviving Katchatheevu is BJP’s desperate attempt to be heard in Tamil
Nadu’ introduces the issue as
follows:
‘Katchatheevu,
a tiny island in the Palk Straits between India and Sri Lanka, hardly 300 acres
in extent is suddenly being sought to be made an election issue in Tamil Nadu. The
islet was ceded by the Indian government to Sri Lanka in 1974 when the
International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) was drawn between the two
countries. The median
line was made to take a turn to accommodate Katchatheevu on the Sri Lankan side
of the IMBL. Since then, the matter has been a political issue in Tamil Nadu.’
Through my land case in
Colombo, I learnt about belief based ownership, ranking higher than money based
ownership. The reason is belief is a Universal power. Hence the requirement
of ‘Beyond reasonable doubt test in criminal cases’. The requirement is belief in the law. To that
extent, we are the judges and we are the accused. This comes naturally with belief.
As per adaderana.lk report:
‘ The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has expressed deep concern about
the recent remarks made by certain Members of Parliament condemning the
invocation of Supreme Court’s fundamental rights jurisdiction by a citizen to
challenge the issuance of liquor licenses’
The question here is - whether or not the member
is a Buddhist or non-Buddhist? If Buddhist article 9 is applicable.
The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give to
Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be the duty of the
State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana, while assuring to all religions
the rights granted by Articles 10 and 14(1)(e)
Foremost is relative. Hence the womb of Buddhist
fundamental rights is Buddha Sasana.
Under fundamental rights the following is facilitated:
14. (1) Every citizen is entitled to –(g)
the freedom to engage by himself or in association with others in any lawful
occupation, profession, trade, business or enterprise;
To the extent, the bar Association is part of the
Judiciary, it has the right to access fundamental rights provisions . But where
there are Buddhist members they have to use Buddhist law. One who relates through
Buddhism is not entitled to claim protection of Secular law common to all Sri Lankans.
If one believes in Sri Lanka , one is Sri Lankan and v.v.
Recently, I entered my Colombo land which is yet to be
vacated by the occupier whom we successfully sued, through PRESCRIPTION ORDINANCE
1872. My legal
team got
upset with me for entering my property! To
my mind, I was exercising my belief in the judgment delivered by the court. I paid
my respects to Lord Buddha in front of the property and the gate opened!
Kachatheevu belongs to the fisher-folks of Tamil Nadu in
common with Sri Lankan fisher-folks who also have been fishing there for generations. It is their fundamental right. The Indira Gandhi government had no right to ‘handover’
nor did the Bandaranaike
government to takeover, that which is common. When that is not blocked, the
seeds of Separatism are sown.
This
is confirmed as follows:
‘This led to fishermen from India being shot and killed as the Sri
Lankan Navy was not able to distinguish between them and the cadre of the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).’
At that level, armies react, because they
lack belief and are mercenaries
No comments:
Post a Comment