Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
EXECUTIVE PRESIDENCY OPPOSES MINDFULLNESS
Recently,
my wise cousin Ravi said to me when I felt low about health issues – ‘we are born for a purpose;
until that purpose is achieved – we will not go, even if we wanted to.’
I felt
good about it because as per my conscious knowledge, I have incomplete
structures in family life and more importantly in public life through Sri
Lankan issues. As a rebel, I need to write and give form to my beliefs. I did
just that about my Australian experiences through my book ‘Naan Australian’ which found its way to the National Library
of Australia, through Congress Library. To me, that is possible only through
belief / Truth. As a rebel, I renounced the status and economic benefits of the
official system. This took me to the level of citizens without portfolios. Then
all my investments in institutional structures became ‘belief based
intelligence’ known commonly as mindfulness by Buddhists. Lord Buddha attained Nirvana / Naked full
mind, on full moon day. He was born on full-moon day indicating this higher purpose
as his mission in life.
The 2022 Tamil film Virata
Parvam, is based on the life of a female Naxalite who renounced all her
official portfolios in her village to become a Naxalite. Her attraction was
based on the writings of the leader who gave up home-comforts to oppose and
discipline the Police. That heroine was also born on Full-moon and was
delivered by a female armed combatant in the forest. Virata is the name of the
nation where the five Pandava heroes of Maha Bharatham lived the last year of
exile incognito.
A true rebel would
acquire such powers to win wars – provided s/he renounces all her/his official
status and money benefits – which become ‘intelligence’ of Absolute power.
The mind that renounces
that which it ‘thinks’ is ‘its’ becomes a full mind.
On that basis, is the
following alert true or false?
[‘Do not panic over intelligence info about
purported terrorist attack’ - https://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking_news/Do-not-panic-over-intelligence-info-about-purported-terrorist-attack/108-240321
The
Defence Ministry requests the public not to panic about the intelligence
information of a purported terrorist attack which is currently circulating in
the social media.
While issuing a statement the
defence ministry said a letter sent by the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to
the Defence Secretary regarding the disclosure of a purported terrorist attack
that may be carried out on July 5 and 6, evoking ‘Black July’, was taken up
into consideration based on unconfirmed information received through intelligence
sources. ]
If it is ‘intelligence’
then it works when kept ‘confidential’. This is essential in subjective system – which
Executive Presidency is. In Democracy, one needs to be transparent – so as to facilitate
the self-governing ‘citizen’ to govern her/himself.
The above alert, if genuine, confirms gilt as depicted by the following picture
sent to me by a Tamil Diaspora leader:
The question is whether the above is true or false?
What happened is true. But the
message is false. It would be true only if the LTTE guns are also shown to
threaten the North with guns. Someone said that the ‘scale’ was different. That
is like using ‘Buddhism Foremost’ article to claim governing status.
If the LTTE were fighting for ‘Freedom’ they would not have threatened Tamil
civilians, including ‘Tamil Politicians’. LTTE were ruling the disenfranchised caste
group. Given that the perpetrators were also Tamils, such killings were in
revenge. The ‘thought’ of Nationalism was desire based in the case of rebels
who seek political solution. Some members, like the Female Naxalite mentioned
above, were true rebels. As per my indicators, Thamilini who wrote openly about her life as a manager
within LTTE comes close to being a true rebel leader of belief. But LTTE and
its current heirs like the above group that sent the picture would not
recognise her – because she was a woman and they want to ‘see’ and ‘show’ man’s
outcomes.
Black July had its origin in LTTE , reported by Wikipedia as follows:
[Thirunelveli attack, 1983
See also: Four Four Bravo
LTTE
leaders at Sirumalai camp, Tamil Nadu, India in 1984 while they are being
trained by RAW (from
L to R, weapon carrying is included within brackets) – Lingam; Prabhakaran's
bodyguard (Hungarian AK), Batticaloa commander
Aruna (Beretta Model 38 SMG),
LTTE founder-leader Prabhakaran (pistol), Trincomalee commander
Pulendran (AK-47), Mannar commander
Victor (M203) and
Chief of Intelligence Pottu Amman (M
16).
[The LTTE
carried out its first major attack on 23 July 1983, when they ambushed Sri Lanka
Army patrol Four Four
Bravo at
Thirunelveli, Jaffna. Thirteen Sri Lankan servicemen were killed in the
attack, leading to the Black July pogrom where up to 3000 Tamil civilians were killed across
the island.[54]
Many
consider Black July to be a planned rampage against the Tamil community
of Sri Lanka, in which sections of the government were implicated.
Black
July
The
pogrom was premeditated, and was finally triggered by a deadly
ambush on 23 July 1983, which caused the death of
13 Sri Lanka
Army soldiers, by the Tamil militant group Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Although initially orchestrated by members of the ruling UNP, the pogrom soon escalated into mass violence with
significant public participation
Thousands of
outraged Tamil youths joined Tamil militant groups to fight the Sri Lankan
government, in what is considered a major catalyst to the insurgency in Sri
Lanka]
The questions to be
asked here are –
(1)
Without India’s training, would the LTTE felt the
courage to oppose?
(2)
Given that India’s training was subjective and
towards protecting Tamils against Sinhalese attacks – was Indian government’s
approval given for the above attack?
(3)
If yes then the killing was by India. If no – then by
claiming responsibility – did the LTTE confirm that it was seeking ‘official’
recognition and was no longer an invisible force/energy?
If yes, then that
also facilitated their Opposition in Sinhalese – JVP in particular – to take
the place of government soldiers - as De
facto force.
Is that not fair?
– Dharma as we call it in Hinduism.
So is the
government’s current interpretation true? No! because it is not belief based.
Hence the warning is to distract civilians. Those who responded most strongly
are the LTTE heirs who are for themselves.
If the government had gone into its truth – it would have known that it was not true. In the alternative if the President who led the war against the LTTE, had renounced his past position’s benefits, he would have developed mindfulness through which he would have identified the truth in this declaration of ‘intelligence’ and kept it confidential within the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment