Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
03
September 2020
Our True
Constitution
Our elders discovered truth which
becomes our law. When we discover truth we become elders to those who follow
the law that the truth confirms. Every truth discovered has a lawful structure.
When we see that truth without the costs or the benefits, we identify with that
structure. Hence the covering of the eyes of Lady Justice.
A Tamil Diaspora leader responded as follows, to my
yesterday’s article headed ‘All Non-Buddhist Leaders in Sri Lankan Parliament
are Unlawful Entrants’
[Very interesting
analysis, Gaja. Could they also include, "true believers of true Buddhism
in words and deeds". ]
My response to this was :
[It is
doubtful that this would directly bring about changes in the written
constitution. But the way we see politicians who disregard this to be in
Parliament as subordinates, will change. Effectively all of them are like
Karuna and Viyalendran.]
Politicians who ‘see’ outcomes first are traders.
Politicians who see outcomes only – are gamblers. Politicians who do not ‘see’
outcomes but only the Energy / Truth that supports existing structures are
Governors. They make exponential contribution to their nation/environment. They
are never forgotten because truth is eternal.
Recently Dr Jeyaseelan Gnanaseelan of the University
of Jaffna shared with us his discovery of the contributors to the Lankan ethnic
conflict through his paper ‘A Discourse Analysis of Ethnic Conflict and Peace
in the Editorials of English Newspapers; A Case Study of Sri Lanka’ . Dr
Gnanaseelan confirms his identity with Media Monitor (2004:28) as follows:
[What would
have been the reasons for different truths to be reported to the Sinhala and
Tamil people? Such reporting confirms the statement that the
Sri Lankan media are not partners in the resolution of the conflict but
participants in the disharmony among the communities.]
Only a very small part of the contribution by the
official media contributes directly to truth and therefore eventually to
lasting peace. When they uphold the laws of publishing, that also goes towards
upholding the truth that the minds discovered and we inherited as laws and Due
Processes. By the same token if we contribute to frivolous use of laws and
law-makers – we weaken our own mind and eventually we weaken peace in our
environment. Media, from time to time facilitates us to identify with minds
that care about others.
Ms Sanja De Silva Jayatilleke revealed such a mind
through her article ‘Blessed are those who seek
justice’. Daily FT gets a share of the blessings by publishing that article. The
share comes as per satisfaction of needs of the readers. Ms Sanja De
Silva Jayatilleke’s sharing includes the following:
[I do not know Hejaaz Hizbullah. …..
I do not know who his clients were as a lawyer. I do know that lawyers defend
all sorts of criminals, because they are considered innocent until proven
guilty. This is the only guarantee that we as citizens have of getting
representation in a court of law, if by some unfortunate turn of fate one is
accused of some crime one did not commit. It is a lawyer who can ensure the
protection of the law to those unfamiliar with the legal arguments, as most of
us are, and justice for the innocent.]
When Mr Hejaaz Hizbullah defended clients he would have added his own
credits with the law. In some instances, the clients may be not guilty as per
their own conscience but guilty as per the written law and v.v. Hence as a couple – they would not be guilty if Mr Hejaaz
Hizbullah’s own credit with the common law is high. That is the value of
community and family. As a lawfully qualified lawyer and as one who has been
practicing the due processes of common law - Mr
Hejaaz Hizbullah has credit as Sri Lankan. As
one who defends Muslim clients due to common cultural belief – he is a senior
Muslim who would internally discipline those who act in breach of Muslim law. That
is the main purposes of Customary laws- so that someone is not punished outside
the boundaries of Natural Justice.
Ms Sanja De Silva Jayatilleke continues to lament as
follows:
[I do not know if the inquiries will
yield proper results or if it’s even possible. I do know that even if nothing
comes of the inquiries anytime soon, there is something that a government can
do, so as not to make things worse for the people. And that is not to pour
vinegar on the wound. Every day that an innocent person suffers in prison
without charge while the authorities scramble for evidence, and as days turn
into months, the collective wounds of those left behind looking for answers,
are renewed and their insecurities are redoubled. It begins to look like
someone is being made a scapegoat because there is not much else the
authorities can do. ]
When a Buddhist finds
fault with a Muslim, s/he needs objective evidence. A Buddhist has the
authority to find fault with another Buddhist subjectively. This is reassured through
article 9 of the constitution. In addition to being a Muslim, Mr Hejaaz
Hizbullah by profession is senior to investigating officers without a law degree. Hence the
greater need for Objective evidence before damaging such relationships and
therefore civil structures. Dr Muhamed Haneef
was arrested by non-Muslim law-enforcement officers – and the only
apparent reason was that he was relative of those involved in the Glasgow
Airport attack.
As per Wikipedia: ‘Haneef's
detention became the longest without charge in recent Australian history, which
caused great controversy in Australia and India.’
Dr Haneef was
released within a month. That is the power of the Australian Public’s
participation in the process of Justice – especially through the media. Mr Hizbullah was arrested on 14 April 2020 by the Sri
Lankan CID. It is now more than four months since that action. Yet as per
reports – he has not been formally charged. Justice Minister - Dr Ali Sabry – a
Muslim himself, highlighted in Parliament, Article 12 of the Sri Lankan
Constitution which provides as follows:
[(1) All
persons are equal before the law and are entitled to the equal protection of
the law.
(2)
No citizen shall be discriminated against on the grounds of race, religion,
language, caste, sex, political opinion, place of birth or any one of such
grounds ]
When the person with authority to punish has knowledge
that the person being punished is of different
race, religion, language, caste or gender – that person has to consciously
prevent herself/himself from using subjective thoughts and consciously apply
the rules from zero advantage start. That process needs to include the
requirement of objective evidence when the person being charged is of a
different culture on the basis of any of the above factors. Yet Dr Sabry is
busy with changes to oblige politicians in high positions, while his community
is denied the protection of the existing constitution.
The true power of minorities is in the absolute
power of truth – as an individual and/or as a community. Otherwise we become
juniors and eventually slaves of masters through majority power.
Unless members of minority community in Parliament refuse
to abide by Article 9 of the Constitution – they do not need laws of equality
and therefore we do not need many articles in Chapter III - the Fundamental Rights section of the
Constitution. Fundamental rights are Belief based. This chapter also provides
against arbitrary arrests. Dr Haneef
sued the Australian government and was awarded compensation. In the case
of Mr Hizbullah such
compensation against the Sri Lankan government is accumulating unit by unit in
the court of Natural Justice/Dharma.
The more un-practiced a law is the greater the need
for Jury hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment