http://austms.blogspot.com/

 

 

LAW MAKERS OR BREAKERS

I paid my respects to    Dr Subramanyam Chandrasekharan of RAW, for appreciating my work as being of educational value and wrote as follows:

‘A wonderful piece!  I wish others had been as frank as you’ are!’

I feel that my book ‘Naan(I am) Australian is with the  National Library of Australia, due to Dr Subramanyam Chandrasekharan.

I believe that Truth, is the Ultimate power. Hence, when  the Owners Corporation of Coogee View, sued us, included the following, as part of our defence:

‘ The Defendants are of the belief that, after truth, the law is the highest common uniting factor in any community and hence have expressly stated that we would pay, if the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) ordered us to pay.’

As per the Defendants’ knowledge, the Strata Committee made the decision as per majority vote, which effectively, rendered priority to majority vote, above the law.

 

The Owners Corporation of Coogee View, avoided NCAT and instead used the Sydney Local Court.

Former Law Maker, Mr Bob Carr is part of the current Strata Committee.

 

Below are  further excerpts from the Defence filed in Court:

 

 

1.    The Ethics-based  reason: The Defendants refused to pay that part of the  Contributions, they  considered to be unethical due to effective Double-Dipping  by separation of items of common nature, confirmed as follows:

 

6.1  The administrative and capital works funds contributions  were listed and approved under Agenda item 6 of AGM 2022

6.2        The $600,000 proposed expenditure for Roof Membrane Replacement, was instead, listed Special Levy - Roof Membrane, Agenda item 7 of AGM 2022. The Defendants interpreted this as dividing and ruling , which has the effect of misleading the owners and effectively portrays a distorted picture about our investment.

6.3  Agenda item 15 of AGM 2022, included the Roof Membrane Replacement expenditure  to be $ 495,230  to be undertaken in 2032, as follows:

‘Replace bituminous membrane - - -495,230’

7.    Given that the Defendants have already been paying towards this expenditure through Capital fund levies , every year, we refused to pay again.

 

 

We paid $63,207.20 , on 05 June 2025.