Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
28
December 2019
VADDUKODDAI
RESOLUTION & BUDDHISM FOREMOST
As requested by me – my husband went looking for the
hose in our storage area. He said it was not there. A few hours later – I went
for a walk and when returning to your home unit – thought of looking for the
hose myself. I had in mind – the enclosed part of the storage area. But as I
neared that area, I started walking towards a big basket in the open area of
our storage space. As I started looking I kept going deeper and deeper into the
basket. There it was! This was because I was seeking and my husband was merely
looking though surface memory because in this activity he did not have deep
memory that comes with experience. As I explained to my husband later – that hose
was the consolidated experience of its core purpose not only here in our Coogee
home but also in Thunaivi- Vaddukoddai where a big part of her was taken
personally by me to facilitate temple activities which are needed to preserve the
ownership of that land which was at risk of being illegally occupied by the
folks in that area who were empowered by arms during the war. When we go deeper
and deeper into an issue we become that. Hence the Hindu saying - Tat tvam Asi / Thou Art That .
ITAK – the largest
Tamil Political party in Sri Lanka - celebrated 70 years on 18 December:
‘ The Speech on the Seventieth Anniversary
of the Federal Party on 18 Dec. 2019 at the Young Artistes Forum Jaffna by M.A.
Sumanthiran MP, PC, Associate Secretary General, Ilankai Thamil Arasuk Katchi’ was published yesterday by Daily Mirror.
Mr Sumanthiran included the following in that
speech:
[After the year 1970, after
withdrawing from efforts to promulgate the First Republican Constitution,
ITAK’s Non-cooperation and Civil Disobedience struggle reached a climax. From
the time Thanthai Chelva resigned from his Parliamentary seat, the idea that we
are not bound by the republican constitution gained wide currency and strength
among Tamils.
As an outgrowth of that development, the Tamil United Front was formed and the latter soon became the Tamil United Liberation Front at the 1976 Convention where the Vaddukoddai Resolution was adopted. As a consequence of our just demands for federalism being ignored and sidelined by the state, that watershed Vaddukoddai Resolution emphasised that we would re-establish our sovereignty that we lost to Europeans in our colonial history. As a result of that resolution the Secretary General of ITAK and three of its MPs were arrested and charged, and tried before a bench of three High Court Judges, consisting of a Trial-at-Bar.
Representing the accused were a team of three Queens Counsel led by Thanthai Chelva, the other two being G.G. Ponnamabalam and Murugesu Tiruchelvam. Besides these legal giants, 64 other lawyers also appeared for the defence. They argued that the Republican Constitution had no force in law and that the Emergency Regulations had not been properly promulgated. That Trial-at-Bar bench accepted the second of these arguments advanced by the accused and set them free. ]
As an outgrowth of that development, the Tamil United Front was formed and the latter soon became the Tamil United Liberation Front at the 1976 Convention where the Vaddukoddai Resolution was adopted. As a consequence of our just demands for federalism being ignored and sidelined by the state, that watershed Vaddukoddai Resolution emphasised that we would re-establish our sovereignty that we lost to Europeans in our colonial history. As a result of that resolution the Secretary General of ITAK and three of its MPs were arrested and charged, and tried before a bench of three High Court Judges, consisting of a Trial-at-Bar.
Representing the accused were a team of three Queens Counsel led by Thanthai Chelva, the other two being G.G. Ponnamabalam and Murugesu Tiruchelvam. Besides these legal giants, 64 other lawyers also appeared for the defence. They argued that the Republican Constitution had no force in law and that the Emergency Regulations had not been properly promulgated. That Trial-at-Bar bench accepted the second of these arguments advanced by the accused and set them free. ]
Wikipedia presents the following picture in this
regard:
[In 1972 the ITAK, ACTC and others formed the Tamil United
Front (later renamed Tamil United
Liberation Front). Amirthalingam
was delivering leaflets along with other leading Tamil politicians (M.
Sivasithamparam, V. N. Navaratnam, K. P. Ratnam and K. Thurairatnam) in 1976 when they were all arrested on government orders.
Sivasithamparam was released but the others were taken to Colombo and tried for sedition. All the defendants were acquitted after a famous trial at
bar case in which 72 Tamil lawyers including S. J. V.
Chelvanayakam and G. G. Ponnambalam acted for the defence.]
There is a third dimension
identified with by me through the following:
[Chockalinga Chittibabu commonly known as Mayor
Chittibabu was an Indian politician and former Member of Parliament elected from Tamil Nadu.
He was elected to the Lok Sabha from Chengalpattu constituency as
a Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam candidate
in 1967 and 1971 elections. He
was first elected to the Madras Corporation in 1958 and was the Mayor of Madras
in 1965. He was arrested under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act after Indira Gandhi declared emergency and the DMK government was
dismissed in 1976.He was jailed along with DMK leaders and Chittibabu died
of injuries and police torture suffered while trying to save M.K.Stalin in
Central Prison, Madras .
The year of 1975 was a tough time for India
and its democracy. That year, Indira Gandhi, the then Congress Prime Minister
of India, declared Emergency on the Country, suppressing civil rights and
unleashing a rein of terror.
MK Stalin a leader of DMK, was just
beginning to step into politics. MK Stalin did not expect it to get as bad as
it did end up becoming. C. Chittibabu, decided to accompany MK Stalin as both
were taken away to prison. All top leaders were taken under arrest. He (Stalin)
later recalled that "for that moment, it was comforting to see a few known
faces." Having Chittibabu, Arcot Veerasamy, Neela Naryanan and
V.S.Govindarajan around helped in dispelling the fear of uncertainty.
That relief would never last. Cramped
cells, unhygienic floors and walls that served to urinate and heavily salted
porridge with chillies for breakfast was enough to break the strongest man.
Everyday, C. Chittibabu's family would try to visit and he himself tried his
hardest to send letters. MK Stalin was singled out, one night, and was beaten
in the most inhuman way by jail supervisors. They had not expected him to live
to tell of this. Chittibabu lunged forward and took several of these blows. But
they were fatal.] - Wikipedia
Whether we recognize it or not our true parents would continuously
influence us and v.v. That is the way of Nature. In my yesterday’s article, I
identified with a parent picture through the War between Athens & Sparta in
Ancient Greece during which Tsunami happened. To my mind Sri Lanka is an heir
of that Greece. Hence I received the following:
[In 416 B.C. — while the Buddha was alive
and teaching the Dharma according to some sources — the Athenian navy launched
an expedition against the island of Melos in the sixteenth year of the
Peloponnesian War. Before commencing their attack, the Athenians met with
the Melians to try to arrange the terms of their surrender. The Melians,
convinced of the justness of their cause, refused. The Athenians then
attacked with overwhelming force, slaying all their men of military age, and
enslaving their women and children.
Thucydides, the great Athenian historian, reports (or rather
imagines) a dialogue between the Athenians and Melians in which the Athenians
argued, essentially, that might — along with the rational calculation of
self-interest — made right. The Athenians rejected the argument that the gods
would support Melos because of the justness of it’s cause:
“When
you speak of the favor of the gods, we may as fairly hope for that as
yourselves…. Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary
law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were
the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing
before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do is to make
use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we
have, would do the same as we do.”] - MELIAN DIALOGUE- How
Many Divisions Does The Buddha Have?
By Buddhist Publication Society
P.O. Box 61
54, Sangharaja Mawatha
Kandy, Sri Lanka
P.O. Box 61
54, Sangharaja Mawatha
Kandy, Sri Lanka
To my
mind, both – the Indian Chittibabu experience and the above message were brought
to me by my true belief as global minded Sri Lankan.
In 1972, the first Sri Lankan Constitution included
the ‘Buddhism Foremost’ article as part of the Constitution. Until then, the
land called Sri Lanka had its own customary laws – each community being like
city-states of Athens and Sparta:
[During the
so-called “Greek Dark Ages” before the Archaic period, people lived scattered
throughout Greece in small farming villages. As they grew larger, these villages
began to evolve. Some built walls. Most built a marketplace (an agora) and a
community meeting place. They
developed governments and organized their citizens according to some sort of
constitution or set of laws. They raised armies and
collected taxes. And every one of these city-states (known as poleis) was said
to be protected by a particular god or goddess, to whom the citizens of the
polis owed a great deal of reverence, respect and sacrifice. (Athens’s deity was Athena, for
example; so was Sparta’s.) Ancient Greece - HISTORY.COM EDITORS]
Article 3 of
the 1972 Constitution stated:
[In the Republic of Sri Lanka sovereignty is
in the People and is inalienable. ]
Only to the extent of one’s belief can one claim to
be Sovereign. At that time – this would have included belief in the British
laws which was commonly applicable to all.
Article 6 of the 1972 Constitution stated:
[The Republic of
Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be
the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana, while assuring
to all religions the rights granted by Section 18(1)(d).]
Belief is Absolute/Sovereign power. Sri Lankan Police Motto is [One who lives
by the Dhamma is protected by the Dhamma itself].
One who believes
in Buddhism will be protected by Buddhism. One who believes in Hinduism, Islam
or Christianity cannot be protected by Buddhism. Likewise, one who believes in
Buddhism does not have the authority to empower any non-Buddhist in order to
satisfy article 3. Article 6 of the 1972 Constitution and Article 9 of the
current Constitution of Sri Lanka are ultra vires not only Article 3 but the
principles of Democracy itself.
Buddhist Police therefore are not authorised to
arrest non-Buddhists. The question I ask Mr Sumanthiran is “How come the Tamil
Legal Giants ‘Thanthai Chelva, G.G. Ponnamabalam
and Murugesu Tiruchelvam’ assisted by 64 lawyers did not raise this
issue when their clients were arrested and
prosecuted?”
How come
Mr Sumanthiran who is presented by Wikipedia as ‘one of Sri Lanka's top human rights and constitutional lawyers’ did not raise this issue during
the 19th Amendment when TNA was the leading Opposition in Parliament
and ought to have had the insight of the People through the alternate pathway?
Neither
Constitution is logically complete due to ‘Buddhism foremost’ requirement /
order which is relative. A provision cannot be Absolute and Relative at the
same time. Hence, as per the unwritten Constitution of Sri Lanka – we went back
to our Customary laws and formed city-states. Even the 13th
Amendment was invalid due to Batticaloa Tamils being governed by Mukkuva
law and Jaffna Tamils by Thesawalamai law.
Now that the two provinces are separated – by Courts they qualify as per article 3.
Our karma
travels with us and if we are not active in the current laws – karma manifests
Itself for better or for worse. Vaddukoddai Resolution was in opposition to Sinhala-Buddhists
who argued as the Athenians
did back then: “When you speak of the
favor of the gods, we may as fairly hope for that as yourselves…. Of the gods
we believe, and of men we know, that by
a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not
as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found
it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do
is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same
power as we have, would do the same as we do.”
But Buddhist law does not permit Buddhists to rule
over others. If it did – it makes a fallacy of Buddha’s teachings.
In turn when Armed Militants killed the Hon
Appapillai Amirthalingam – that heritage of non-violent opposition to Buddhism Foremost was
killed and until that is addressed, no member of ITAK – including Mr
Sumanthiran has the moral authority to refer to the Hon Chelvanayagam as Thanthai
/ Father. The real inheritance is not
the money nor status but the values through which one lived.
No comments:
Post a Comment