SRI
LANKAN JUTICE MINISTER –
HAS
CONVERTED TO BUDDHISM?
Experience goes straight
to ‘wisdom’. Without experience any law becomes the workshop of the idle mind.
Take for example the following report by Economy Next:
[Sri Lanka
opposition leader Sajith Premadasa on Wednesday (04) blamed Finance Minister
Ali Sabry for his role as then Justice Minister in passing the 20th amendment
in 2020 which controversially restored a number of executive powers of the
president, which Premadasa claimed contributed to the economic and political
crises Sri Lanka is now facing.]
In Democracy, it is
the Parliament that passes a law and not the Justice Minister. It is the duty
of the Justice Minister to ensure that there is logic in the law. It is also
the duty of the Shadow Ministry to Oppose logically – including by highlighting
an imbalance in the proposed law. The picture ‘shown’ by the Opposition becomes
the law of minorities or v.v. Otherwise the People who have the adverse experience
become the Opposition – as has happened in Sri Lanka. Likewise People who had
positive experience through the law become the government in their home area.
Yesterday, I
received such an endorsement to my work:
[I have lots of appreciation for your credibility
in journalism and creative writing. They are valuable and should not go astray.
I want to suggest to you that you should document all your writing with
chapters on politics, philosophy, psychology etc. by publishing a book. This is
only a request from a friend. You can donate a couple of copies to the Jaffna
Public Library.
After all, I come from Araly North, which
is only a couple of km from your Thunaivi if I am correct.
Maybe the area inherits intellectuals.]
I was pleasantly surprised by this response that connected
me to my temple heritage from my paternal grandmother of Araly North in
Northern Sri Lanka. That gentleman did not know this but by becoming the medium
he confirmed common ownership.
If Mr Premadasa had likewise felt connected to his electorate
of Colombo at the time of 20th Amendment, he would have connected to
the intellectuals who are protesting in Colombo now.
Then he would have invoked the intelligence of the
more intellectually driven Parliamentarians. Only about 30% of Parliamentarians
voted against the 20th Amendment.
Educated in their language more Parliamentarians are likely to have
opposed it intellectually. If indeed the 19th Amendment had the
blessings of the People, the UNP would have come to power and Mr Ranil
Wickremesinghe would have been President of Democratic Sri Lanka, The failure
to take it to the Public through Public Administration at coal face made it an
idle amendment of intellectuals - that
pleased others but failed internally.
The 20th Amendment on the other hand hit
the hip-pocket nerve of the civilian due to lack of Opposition to it within the
Parliament. The best example is the ban of farmers’ fertilizer subsidy influenced
by the power of the 20th Amendment. A military leader would lack the belief to connect
to the basic needs of the farmer. Even in the case of foreign governments –
their attraction to Sri Lanka is its armed power –including the power exercised by armed rebels in all major ethnic groups. They
cannot be regulated by law. They could be managed by belief. The poem in the appendix,
in response to my article on karma, highlights the essence of the economic balance
and how the balance is carried forward.
My response to an American professional who
recommended pursuit of class legal action against Aspen Medical went as
follows:
‘As you would appreciate, there is an Equal &
Opposite force /entry manifested for every entry / action. The higher the level
at which we make the first entry – the closer the other side would be to
exponential power which navigates itself. My article has been forwarded
to Australian government also. I took action against the then PM (John Howard)
when he was head of state. Beyond that I do not have position support or group
support. But in its place I have the ‘intuitive intelligence’ to have the
higher level experience through others’ work. In this instance the ‘other’ is
ABC and now it is you also. From Sri Lankan angle below is the poem by Dr
Saliya .’
Finally, Mr Premadasa who is a Buddhist has failed to correct
the imbalance in Article 9 of the Constitution which renders Buddhism Executive
Presidential status. Every non-Buddhist Sri Lankan who feels the pain of
discrimination but continues to believe s/he is Sri Lankan, would effectively ‘curse’
Buddhists who benefit due to this article. At constitutional level blessings
and curses spread exponentially.
If Mr Sabry gets paid for his work as Justice Minister,
and yet has failed to correct this imbalance, then he has effectively converted
to Buddhism. On that basis he is not likely to legitimately balance the Finances
of Sri Lanka. If the cause is in favour of one side, the effects also would be.
Then the cumulative karma of the government takes control through powers of
Natural Sri Lankans who balance the books in their own areas of control. They
are the true governors of Sri Lanka and they do not need any Executive power –
through Buddhism or Secular law. The governments since 1972 have recorded
single entry through Article 9 of the Constitution .
APPENDIX
No comments:
Post a Comment