Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
08
July 2019
Buddhist
Isolation?
“Even if
you are a minority of one, the Truth is the Truth.” – so said Mahatma
Gandhi. When we live in truth natural forces unite us with others who also live
by their truth. The forms may be different but the experience is One. True
experience when shared empowers exponentially. That is the value of Governance.
As per Al Jazeera report headed ‘Sri Lanka on alert as
Buddhist monks meet over presidential vote’:
[Police lined up on the streets of the Sri
Lankan highland city of Kandy and the army was on standby, as hardline Buddhist
monks gathered for their first big assembly since a spate of deadly bombings targeting
churches and hotels on Easter Sunday.
Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara, the influential head of the
Buddhist nationalist group Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), has called for as many as
10,000 clergymen from across the country to attend the meeting on Sunday.]
Unless Buddhists
feel they contributed to this problem – they do not have democratic rights to
participate in the solution. The problem Easter problem was apparently between
Muslims and Christians at the cultural level. Neither group has sought the involvement
of Buddhists as successful practitioners of their own order. The constitutional
provisions have also separated Buddhists from non-Buddhists. The Easter problem confirms this separation
which has also been given form by government as being between Muslims and
Christians. Both groups being part of minority
will manifest their own habits in a ‘free and natural’ environment. The
government strongly influenced by Buddhist monks are foreigners to these minority
groups.
As per the above
report Buddhist monk Gnanasara is reported to have stated:
["Today, the Sinhala
ethnicity, which has developed this country historically, has become very weak
... There is no leader who holds responsibility for Sinhalese".
"We will only turn
back after creating a leader to the country and getting the power to Sinhalese.
Trust us" ]
The above is
denial of ownership by non-Sinhalese.
But as per Gandhi’s discovery – even One person can have her/ his nation within
the country called Sri Lanka. That is what prescriptive rights are about. The
land through which that person realises such nationhood is hers/his by belief. As
per the law of prescription – possession needs to be adverse, overt and uninterrupted. In other words, these
confirm belief based ownership. This is possible where the lawful owners
neglect the property / position. Likewise when the lawfully elected government neglects parts of the country – and an
individual or group develops self-governance, such ownership becomes more valid
than the ownership by law. When it happens through religion – then that
governance is more valid than government by letter of law.
A citizen who
practices the law more than the government
at a particular area – is entitled to use the government as a ‘facility’.
Hence the ‘user pays’ system.
I believe that
the Police facilities in Vaddukoddai area are such facilities in my case. When
the minds of officers merge with such self-governing persons – their level of ownership
is also escalated. Likewise when the government accepts such personal
development of nationhood – the standard of government is elevated. But where there
is law on the side of one group – such as Buddhist monks in this instance – and
believe on the side of the other – the latter has the responsibility to
demonstrate adverse possession – i.e. – opposite pathway to the lawfully
endorsed Buddhist group. True rebellion happens through such adverse possession
of the citizens’ pathway.
In Sri Lanka –
politics is strongly linked to religion instead of land. To be also democratic there
needs to be clear separation of powers between religious groups. The Easter
bombings are the concerns of Muslims and Christians and not Buddhists who
officially isolated themselves in 1972 through Buddhism Foremost provision in
the Constitution. Any breach of the constitution that hurts a believer – albeit
through a different pathway – would bring about exponential damage to the
official government. Greater official empowerment of a Buddhist leader would
only strengthen this return karma. I have witnessed this here in Australia,
through my own belief based actions which returned exponentially when I was
separated from the main group. The success of immigration is strongly linked to Equal Opportunity to
prevent such exponential adverse returns through the system of Truth.
Buddhists as Opposition of other religions have the
duty to complete their ‘packaging’ and find leaders of ‘Buddhists Only’. They
lack jurisdiction over non-Buddhists. The alternate is to join at Process level
– as stipulated by the law. Then the Common Law elects the leader who would
have jurisdiction over all citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment