Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
04
September 2020
Two
Bleeding Halves that Lanka is
Most Hindus have
knowledge of ‘Kaala Bhairavar’ – who is a protecting form. The black dog is the
opposite of the Divine form and confirms depression of the unprotected mind.
Strangely there is a ‘Black Dog Institute’ here in
Australia, presented as follows by Wikipedia:
[The Black Dog Institute is a not-for-profit facility for diagnosis, treatment
and prevention of mood disorders such as depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder. It was
founded in 2002 by the UNSW School of
Psychiatry Scientia Professor Gordon Parker and is based in Sydney, Australia.]
During my tenure
at the University of NSW, Professor Parker was the head of School of
Psychiatry. The institute was not in existence then. But the minds connect
including subconsciously.
As per Wikipedia
- Kaala
Bhairavar is known as Yamantaka. Yaman in Tamil means the lord of death. Yamantaka
is known in Buddhism as destroyer of death.
Kaalam is time. The
black dog means unbalanced effects unsettled within time. Those who enjoy one
side as pleasures – become depressed when the time to settle the costs expire. This
risk is high in politics where false promises are made in exchange for votes.
In their Island article ‘False historical perspectives of Wigneswaran’ authors Rienzie
Wijetilleke and Kusum Wijetilleke have highlighted some such promises include
the following :
[In the mid-1950s, speeches such as the below,
made by SWRD, were common place:
“… the fears of
the Sinhalese, I do not think can be brushed aside as completely frivolous. I
believe there are a not inconsiderable number of Tamils in this country out of
a population of 8 million. Then there are 40-50 million Tamil people in the
adjoining country. What about all this Tamil literature, Tamil teachers, even films,
papers and magazines?… I do not think there is an unjustified fear of the
inexorable shrinking of the Sinhala language. It is a fear that cannot be
brushed aside”]
Tamil
Nadu in India is a real threat for Sinhala only or Buddhism foremost folks and
is a protection to Tamil only or Hinduism foremost claimants living in Sri
Lanka. SWRD as per his political expressions, belonged in the former and Mr CVW
as per his expressions belongs in the latter. Neither is an independent citizen
contributing to Sovereignty of Sri Lanka.
The
authors highlight the two sides in the 1930s:
[In the mid-1930s, S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike
(SWRD) formed the Sinhala Mahasabha, a party whose sole purpose was to promote
Sinhalese culture and community interests. This was a direct response to the
Tamil Nationalist anti-Sinhala movement led by G.G. Ponnambalam (GGP) in that
same decade. The result was one of the earliest Sinhala – Tamil riots in modern
history, at Nawalapitiya in 1939. The riots were reportedly the result of
disparaging comments made by GGP regarding the Mahavamsa which were perfectly
in tune with much of his rhetoric during this time.]
SWRD founded the Sri Lanka
Freedom Party which won only one seat in 2020 and that too was by a Jaffna
Tamil. ‘Time has told’ the truth about how depressing that party was found to
be.
The authors continue on as
follows:
[Prior
to the incident, at the launching of the Sinhala Mahasabha branch in
Nawalapitiya, SWRD commented that the party should erect a statue of GGP to
thank him for provoking its very existence. Being a shrewd politician, SWRD
understood the influence of a well-motivated reactionary movement, fueled by
the rhetoric of its nemeses. This seems to be a point lost on Mr. Wigneswaran
judging by his recent comments in Parliament, reminiscent of the sort of
grand-standing and ferocious rhetoric the famous GGP traded in.]
Wrong.
GGP as a lawyer fought to win. Mr CV
Wigneswaran with his inheritance as a Judge would tend to see both sides. Hence
he is not a natural politician that GGP was. Also as per my corporate knowledge
of Jaffna Tamil community – GGP is still admired as a clever leader. Majority
Jaffna folks like cleverness more than commonness. Many in the Sinhala
community have reacted to CVW who actually acted like SWRD in the above
experience. One who lacks commonness would be blind to this similarity.
The
best contribution by the authors is:
[During the debates on the Sinhala Only Act,
a special mention must be made on the efforts of Dr. Colvin R. De Silva to
rebuke what was a popular decision amongst the majority;
“… Do we want an
independent Ceylon or two bleeding halves of Ceylon which can be gobbled up by
every ravaging imperialist monster that may happen to range the Indian Ocean?
These are issues that in fact we have been discussing under the form and
appearance of the language issue… One language, two nations; two languages, one
Nation…”]
The authors observe as follows:
[These intuitive comments would prove to be
prophetic some years later. It must be said that many of these men were all
products of their time, of their environments and of their intellectual
pursuits.]
But I connect more deeply to the mind of Ceylonese.
Accordingly I see King Solomon’s Judgment being reversed in Sri Lanka – with Ceylon
going neither to Tamils nor to Sinhalese but in parts – to China and India. As
we sow, so shall we reap.
No comments:
Post a Comment