Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
25 August 2020
RESPONSE TO A TAMIL DIASPORA LEADER
Thank you Victor for your genuine response. This opens up channels
of sharing that would be immensely valuable to Jaffna as well as Sri Lanka.
You state
[We, in the Diaspora community, to get
information from our homeland, rely on the news
we receive via the
internet based on publications, eyewitness reports, videos and other documents.
Obviously, we do not go to Sri lanka to
verify the authenticity of those news.]
I guess this is where the difference stems from. I have been going
to Sri Lanka regularly and have had the ‘EXPERIENCE’ . Different media report
different manifestations – each as per their own priorities. As you know – I do
not get much space in mainstream media and no space in Tamil media. Hence
I am ‘free’ of desire to be recognized by them. This in turn helps my own
experience to travel through their – media reports of ‘what happened’ and
brings me the ‘intelligence’ needed by me to serve my particular groups. My
groups are those who are related to me through various structures – including
professional and those who believe in me – largely because I have contributed
to the satisfaction of their needs.
This is kind of based on the rebirth philosophy according to which
we take only the sins and virtues into next life.
One such group into which my spirit was born is the village of
Thunaivi – a toddy tapper village. It is in Vaddukoddai District. Its twin
suburb is Sangarathai. We have an ancestral Family temple there. Attached
are indicators of my service there. The picture of Mr Wigneswaran with Thunaivi
local youth leader would confirm that I valued the sharing of status that
happened. These are published in my blog. This is what you would have seen as
‘fact’ if a local newspaper had published it. But the ‘experience’ that I had
there was different. That building that Mr Wigneswaran opened on behalf of
Northern leadership was built on someone else’s land. The money came from your
parallel in the Diaspora. I urged those concerned to do a Deed of Declaration
and then build the building which was primarily to promote that member of the
Diaspora. This did not happen. Later when they did not even invite me for the
opening ceremony I was hurt and I told them so. I said that they failed to
honour me – the person without status but honoured Mr Wigneswaran who was Chief
Minister. After that I did give publicity to through my mails – so the
Vaddukoddai folks would learn of the progress. Such ‘lessons’ were needed to
override the caste barriers in that area.
Victor,
our family donated land for the building of Development Secretariat – so they
would not do to someone else - what they did in the above case. Mr Wigneswaran
and others make public speeches about land taken over by the government. They
do not connect to the karma of locals who habitually occupy other peoples
lands. At one of the meetings in the Development Secretariat one leader said
that since GG Ponnabalam’s time he knew how to ‘capture’ lands. I told him that
that building which was built on our land was strictly for Administrative
purposes. They did not bother us thereafter.
During the above function presided by Mr CVW Mr Kanag Eeswaran PC –
who was /is TNA’s lawyer did not attend even though his home is closer
than ours to the building. That was his reality. Mr CVW did not even visit that
place thereafter. I did not expect him to after I did his job in taking up the
case of a group of Nurses regarding permanency of their appointments after the
2015 elections. I led the group to the Department of Health in 2016 – few
months before the above ceremony. They did approach Mr CVW but he did not get
involved. I used my Energies to connect to the Administrators there – and when
a group of more than 100 were made permanent – I felt that my energies had
combined with those who had the power to deliver as per our combined karma.
Since Mr CVW had by then already taken the path of praising rebels he would
have lacked the natural connection to take this up. Had he not gone that way
his position as former Judge would have gone a long way to get such results as
I did. Despite all that they – the folks of Thunaivi forgot me once they got
the benefits.
Recently when a new Australian group contacted me in regards to
Vaddukoddai I forwarded to them details of the visit by Thiru – who was
known to them –and who passed away recently. Thiru came to training centre and
to our temple and shared his kind heart with the folks there. I wrote as
follows:
[Our Tribute to Thiru is at http://www.austms.org/news_and_events/Thiru_visit_March_2014.pdf
In the
alternative you would be able to access it through http://www.austms.org/ . It is listed
under news and events – as item 2. Ragavan who joined Jetwing was also blessed
by Thiru who received copy of this. Another group associated with Vaddu
Central Alumni – was helped to get building works through Thiru’s association
with Mascons. They did not go far. The difference is the tribute to Guru
Now Victor you would appreciate that I interpret outcomes
independently as per my experience. This is certainly different to that of Mr
CVW.
Hence I leave you to work
out whether your following statement to me is based on ‘facts’ that were
available to you.
[You
may have some personal enmity against
Mr. Wigneswaran and consider Sumanthiran as
an angel. I do not have to follow the same pursuit.]
I have no enmity
towards Mr CVW. I strongly Oppose his attachment to the Judicial status while
enjoying current status as Politician and also his ‘show’ of apparent
Hindu leadership which is in breach of the principle of detachment to the
past. You may ‘bribe’ him to keep him tied to that attachment. I oppose that
too naturally.
As for Sumanthiran
being an angel – he is the best out of a bad lot in Jaffna. Even then I did not
express in his favour because I do not feel that way. From time to time I was
critical of him also But through the 2018 Constitutional crisis I mind-merged
with him at policy level. To mind merge you cannot oppose. I am not aware of any
strong contribution by Mr CVW to that issue. As indicated above - in the clip
about Thiru – Guru is important to me. There are times when my past is my guru.
I present this as follows in the opening chapter of my book Naan Australian:
[Friday 23 November 2007 –
judgment day in matter Gaja Lakshmi Paramasivam (GLP) v University of New
South Wales (UNSW), at the full bench of Australian Federal
Court of Appeal.
I walked
into room 21A – a majestic-looking room. At the computer below the Judge’s
chair was a young man. There was no one else in the room. I bowed to the
Judge’s chair and seated myself. I thought of Lawyer Todd Golding (from the
Office of the New South Wales Crown Solicitor) who asked me earlier
in the year as to why I was bowing when there was no judge in the chair. I said
‘I am bowing to the god of Justice’. I felt that Justice was part
of me. I felt that Justice came with me everywhere I went. Hence in
a way I was bowing to the god of Justice inside me. By manifesting my respect
for THAT Judge, I believe I was placing there – the power / energy to develop a
position fit for such a Judge and if there was already one within the system –
for that Judge also to receive my royalties / respects. This meant that
we were sharing each other’s Energies. By doing that without the other side
seeing me or even knowing I was doing that – I was also invoking the
Judge equal and opposite to the litigant through whose position I was in that
Court. ]
This would help the independent seeker appreciate that I do not
support someone based on their ‘form’ but that my Energies would naturally
connect me to the most appropriate current medium. Sumathiran who has promised
commitment to Business Development gets my natural vote. Those who depend on
the past got Mr CVW and their Sinhala parallels got Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa.
You state
[Sumanthiran
and his TNA were with Ranil's Government since 2015. When Ranil had a
legal problem
Sumanthiran unconditionally 'jumped'
to his rescue.]
Victor, since I also mentally shared my Energies with Ranil’s group
– I am not able to identify with your measure. To me the 2018 Crisis was a
battle between law and crooked politics. It obviously was not an experience for
you. It ought to have been to Mr CVW whose guru ought to have been the law as
interpreted by the Judiciary. When we attribute to Guru – our own
mind-structure gets elevated to the higher level. We may have felt affection for
the Rebels. But when we officially use their work it has to be positioned below
those who have lived within the boundaries of law. Mr CVW’s expressions failed
to confirm such positioning. Your account of the Sashikala matter will
not be upheld in a court of law of global standards for this reason. Now that
Tamils as a community have escalated the war issue to UN level we have the duty
to practice law at that level. In the article that started off this sharing, I
have highlighted that pathway as follows:
[Deserving of support of
Discretionary Powers ]
Discretionary powers at your own local level would not
automatically fit higher common forums which are topped by the UN. One
who upholds UN values would naturally invoke its powers through those within
the UN of similar standards. That is when they do not need evidence to rule to
uphold our contribution. That is also when discretionary powers of a judge are
appropriately used. This seems to have happened through Ms Navaneetham Pillai
when the lady was within the UN. My focus is on developing this component
including within the Australian Tamil community.
You state about the group at the Jaffna vote-counting centre:
[What I could surmise from this was that the antagonism and hatred
towards Sumanthiran, was the reason why the TNA Party members were not
applauded. Perhaps even a few TNA supporters there did not dare to clap, as
they sensed the Crowd mentality and kept silent to be safe from
any abuse, verbal or even physical!
Victor, as per my knowledge of you – you would have knowledge
of ‘Salangai Oli’ film. That film highlights how people applaud on the basis of
outer covers. The hero Balu (played by Kamal Haasan) lived that art but was
poor. He wrote a negative review of the performance by Sailaja – the rich
artist very conscious of her status and looks. The audience except Balu
applauded her. In this instance you are acting like those who applauded whilst
I am the parallel of Balu who highlights the fundamental errors in the performance
of the young artist who was performing various art forms under the name of
Bharatha Naatyam. I connected what happened to the voting system – as
structured. The various forms are First Past the Post, Preferencial voting for
Parties and Preferencial voting for individual candidates. Like Sailaja many
have indiscriminately mixed all of them and you have not used any basis at all
in your analyses. Balu in the above film shows in action the difference
between Bharatha Naathyam of Tamil origin on the one hand and Kathak and
Kathakali – both of North Indian origin. The highlight of that episode was the
sloka /tenet :
‘Yatho Hasta
thatho Drishti, Yatho Drishti thatho Manah
Yatho Manah thatho Bhaava, Yatho Bhaava thatho Rasa’
Meaning –
Where Hands (Hasta) are (artfully
held) the eyes (Drishti) come
Where the
eyes are focused the mind comes
Where the
mind is focused Bhava / Soulful attitude comes
Where the
Bhava is Sweet Experience happens
The
parallel of the above in Politics is :
Yatho votes
thatho sight of the People
Yatho
Sight thatho Mind
Yatho
mind thatho Dharma
Yatho
Dharma thatho Belief
Victor, your eyes were on the visible outcomes pleasant to you. Your
ears were with the applause given by audience like you.
If we voted on the basis of our independent belief – we would
naturally begin developing common belief.
Thank you again
Anbudan / With Love
Gaja
No comments:
Post a Comment