Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
22
June 2020
Sri Lanka confirms Trading in UN
Membership
Those who make a structure and/or
maintain it work the structure. We pay our respects to our elders because they
are part of our inheritance. We attribute to Guru for that reason. Otherwise we
would tend to think that possession is ownership. One of the experiences that
confirmed the above to me happened here in Australia – at the University of NSW(UNSW).
I was part of the team recruited to restructure the Accounting system to be
more democratic. As usual I had conflict with my seniors who were from the ‘old
system’. The executive director of the Medical faculty – Jeff Warnock said to
me at one stage that he had contacted my previous supervisor Ms Colleen Moore
because he was not sure who was right – my seniors or myself. I asked Jeff ‘What
did Colleen say?’ Jeff smiled and said that Colleen had said that she thought
that when I left the system I had developed would ‘collapse’ but that it was
still going. I thanked Colleen in my heart for attributing credit to me. I
resigned from my substantive position within the UNSW and was recruited by
Sports Medicine which was an independent business unit. I continued to constructively
criticize the Central Administration and this resulted in my departure from
Sports Medicine also. It was during the funeral of the Director of Sports
Medicine – Dr David Garlick that I learnt about the ‘collapse’ within the
Medical Faculty. Sydney Morning Herald reported it as follows:
[The
fight erupted at the University of NSW in 2001 when Professor Hall was accused
of scientific misconduct, including misrepresentation of scientific data,
fabrication of experimental results and misuse of research grants.
Several inquiries, a reference to the
Independent Commission Against Corruption and the resignation of the
vice-chancellor, Professor Rory Hume, followed.]
One of the main areas of controversy raised by me
was management of National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grants. Details
of this are in my book Naan Australian. Had the Research office heard me and
included me – the University would have been ‘saved’ the bigger pain. If one
takes my contribution as genuine Energy then that would have spread to research
area also – as protective force. Colleen knew this intuitively about my work
and thus that system did not collapse. I was reminded of this this morning when
I read the subject heading ‘WHO IS LISTENING & WHO CARES ?’ – about the UN
Security Council Vote to elect Non-Permanent members. My immediate response
from within was ‘I am listening / reading and I care’
As per my experience – when we genuinely care and
complete the cycle of truth through our local experience that completed Energy
becomes a permanent force at the highest level of influence. I wrote a paper
about my UNSW experience using Racial Discrimination law as the measure and
submitted it to the UN. All I had to do was to ensure that what I wrote was true
and intellectually logical to me. I do not know how the UN received it or what
it did with it. But the result is my elevated thought structure that returns
reliable satisfaction to me. This has helped me balance the effects of Caste
Discrimination in Northern Sri Lanka, which was diluting the power of
Vaddukoddai Resolution 1976. One who is carrying unjust discrimination on one
basis does not have the moral authority to declare independence on the basis of
belief. Even though I did not give birth to that resolution – I am a strong
component of the Energy that works that Resolution. Likewise, in the case of
UN. Like in Postal Acceptance rule in Contract Law, once we perform to confirm
ownership / completion – on the basis of belief – the other side is
automatically taken as being accepted. Prescriptive rights are accepted in law
for that reason of Belief. That is also the power of democracy.
The government may nor hear us but when we
contribute through belief – the sovereignty of our contribution is completed. In
contrast - the Sri Lankan Government
confirms Trading in through its UN
Membership – as it did with membership in Lankan Parliament:
[In a
hard-hitting message, Sri Lanka this week abstained from voting for any
candidate–Canada, Ireland or Norway–from the Western European and Other States
Group (WEOG) in a contest for the UN Security Council’s (UNSC) non-permanent
seats.
The
basis for the decision was conveyed to all three countries. They were made to
understand that “they also need to rethink the way they do business with us,”
an authoritative source said.
“It
was an important way to make our vote count,” he asserted. “There is a need for
recalibration of our relationships, and a serious re-evaluation of how all
three countries deal with us in the international arena.”]
As per that report
[Sri Lanka voted for India and
Kenya in the Asia Pacific and Africa Group respectively]
One is entitled to conclude that the vote for India
is NOT on the basis of belief but for quid pro quos. These are reasons why the
UN structure has lost power as WHO confirmed during the pandemic.
No comments:
Post a Comment