Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
24
March 2020
Article 151 for
the Curfew Expenditure?
I
learnt through my Chartered Accounting lessons in Sri Lanka, that every debit
must have an equal and opposite credit. They are like the two sides of the one
Parliament. An Opposition cannot negate
the other but needs to be able to ‘see’ the other side not seen by the
Government. The spending of the current government has been put under the
microscope by the Hon Ranil Wickremesinghe – the effective Opposition in issues
relating to law.
As
per Daily Financial Times:
[Former
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe yesterday called on the Government to
reconvene Parliament and get the necessary funds approved to deal with the
situation that has arisen due to the coronavirus, saying that the President has
no powers to draw money from the consolidated fund after the dissolution of
Parliament.
“It
is difficult to predict when a new Parliament can convene. This is a crisis and
this crisis can be resolved only by reconvening the old Parliament and getting
the necessary funds approved by the Legislature,” Wickremasinghe said in a
statement issued yesterday.
He said funds for the first four months of this year were allocated by the Vote on Account (VOA) last October and the President has no powers to draw additional funds from the consolidated fund until Parliament reconvenes]
He said funds for the first four months of this year were allocated by the Vote on Account (VOA) last October and the President has no powers to draw additional funds from the consolidated fund until Parliament reconvenes]
Adaderana
reports about the Government’s side in this regard:
[Rajapaksa said that Wickremesinghe contends that
therefore, after the 30th of April 2020, the present government would not have
the legal right to allocate funds for any purpose whatsoever. Former opposition
leader Sajith Premadasa has also been repeatedly making the same assertion via
the social media, he said.
The PM stressed
that under Article 150(3) of the Constitution, the President is vested with the
power to allocate funds from the Consolidated Fund to maintain government
services after Parliament has been dissolved.
“Hence the public should not entertain
any fears about the availability of funds for the anti-Coronavirus campaign and
to maintain other government services,” he said.]
Article 150(3) of the Sri Lankan Constitution reads as follows:
[(3)
Where the President dissolves Parliament
before the Appropriation Bill for the financial year has passed into law, he
may, unless Parliament shall have
already made provision, authorize the issue from the Consolidated Fund and
the expenditure of such sums as he may consider necessary for the public
services until the expiry of a period of three months from the date on which
the new Parliament is summoned to meet]
As
per my interpretation of article 150(3) – it applies where the Elections are
determined. The appropriate article, to
my mind is 151 which states:
[151.
(1)
Notwithstanding any of the provisions of Article 149, Parliament may by law
create a Contingencies Fund for the purpose of providing for urgent and
unforeseen expenditure.
(2) The Minister in charge of the
subject of Finance, if satisfied – (a) that there is need for any such
expenditure ; and (b) that no provision for such expenditure exists, may, with
the consent of the President, authorize provision to be made therefor by an
advance from the Contingencies Fund.
(3) As soon as possible after every such
advance, a Supplementary Estimate shall be presented to Parliament for the
purpose of replacing the amount so advanced.]
Article
149 states:
[149.
(1) The funds of the Republic not
allocated by law to specific purposes shall form one Consolidated Fund into
which shall be paid the produce of all taxes, imposts, rates and duties and all
other revenues and receipts of the Republic not allocated to specific purposes.
(2) The interest on the public debt,
sinking fund payments, the costs, charges and expenses incidental to the
collection, management and receipt of the Consolidated Fund and such other
expenditure as Parliament may determine shall be charged on the Consolidated
Fund.]
Obviously, the current government and the President
did not ‘foresee’ the Coronavirus expenditure as a recurrent expenditure. This
has been highlighted by Mr Wickremesinghe as a ‘crisis’ which it is to many
countries.
The Rajapaksa government is known to have abandoned
the law during the war. Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa abandoned the law in October 2018
also. It is therefore not surprising that they would abandon the law during
this period also. Unless he self-punished himself for those breaches – that karma
will mutate and continue to lead any manifestation by him in a law-abiding
group.
Corona was rightly or wrongly unforeseen by the
current President and the Prime Minister. Hence the provisions of Article 151
need to be the basis. As per this article only and Advance is allowed . This
means the actuals need to be Accountable and appropriately approved.
So, did the current government follow Article 151
for the Curfew?
No comments:
Post a Comment