Gajalakshmi Paramasivam
23 June 2017
Corrupt
Lawyers indicate Corrupt Justice system
[Meehan’s
LinkedIn profile features a quote from US lawyer Clarence Darrow that: “To be an effective criminal defence counsel,
an attorney must be prepared to be demanding, outrageous, irreverent,
blasphemous, a rogue, a renegade and a hated, isolated and lonely person.”
Less than 24
hours before he pleaded guilty, Meehan updated his Facebook profile with a
photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator with the catchphrase: “I’ll be back.”] The Courier
Mail article under the heading ‘Former high-profile solicitor Tim Meehan has pleaded guilty to fraud
I smiled – placing the LTTE in place of Mr. Meehan.
When Sinhalese celebrated the defeat of LTTE on the roads of Colombo in 2009,
some young Tamils around me said ‘More
Prabhakarans will be born’ – which is the parallel statement of Mr. Meehan’s
‘I’ll be back’ declaration. Each time a Sinhalese who is a ‘foreigner’ to
Tamils calls the LTTE ‘Terrorists’ the ‘other side’ of that pleasure of
unearned authority is born – at the deeper level of the two sides represented.
When irrelevant judgments are delivered for ‘gossip’ purposes against one who
upholds the Truth the roots of that side are damaged and disorder happens beyond their control.
In a Court of Law, when Truth is published to uphold
Natural Justice any relevant law would bow to that Truth to become a facility
for that Truth to become the law in that environment. British Judges of Indian Courts
expressed respect for Gandhi for that reason.
I learnt about corrupt lawyers when I expressed in
Court the Truth that the University of
NSW (UNSW) needed as per my discovery. The law I used was the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 which is least practiced in
Administration by Australian Administrators and Politicians, but is most needed
to be part of the global community through higher education. The mandate
of a University is to seek and find the
Truth through Research and share that discovery through Teaching. I performed at the highest level of standards
known to me even when I was paid far less than my White Australian parallels. The
difference when absorbed developed ownership in the work of the minds that
discovered the Anti Discrimination Law in a Multicultural society. By accepting my lower returns – I became one
minded with them – and hence understand the above quotation by US lawyer Clarence Darrow that: “To
be an effective criminal defence counsel, an attorney must be prepared to be
demanding, outrageous, irreverent, blasphemous, a rogue, a renegade and a
hated, isolated and lonely person.”
To be part of the disorderly system of the UNSW I
had to demonstrate conduct that would show me to be disorderly and thus bring
out the Truth of the Disorderly in a ‘free’ Association. In an environment that
is true to itself – the ‘other’ side would become my opposition. Where this ‘other’
side includes ‘judges’ and I am punished, that environment makes me an enemy of
itself and breeds pro terrorism karma.
Gandhi
expressed his Truth which reflected disobedience as well as actions in breach
of the law and earned the punishment of
imprisonment through laws ‘foreign’ to majority Indians. When the judge so
punishing merely applies the letter of the law as per his duty – it is like
Gandhi punishing himself. But where judges went further than the letter of the law and tried
to ‘show’ authority – they bred pro terrorism karma which is still haunting Britain.
When we actively use current measures – we prevent
past karma from invoking itself. But when we neglect current measures relevant
to our current environment and our position in that environment we invoke our
past karma for better or for worse. When we are naturally true to the position
through which we earn authority to judge and to discipline insiders and punish
outsiders, even our thoughts go towards repairing the roots of a damaged
system. This invokes also similar Energies beyond time and place borders. That
was how Sri Lankan Tamils won the position of Opposition Leadership in National
Parliament, when majority race failed to uphold its own race’s stated principles
and values of the past. Lord Buddha is one such elder to majority Sinhalese and
like Thesawalamai for Tamils of Northern Sri Lanka, this was embedded into the
Common Constitution in addition to the Customary Kandyan Law applicable to
Sinhalese. In effect that provision ‘Buddhism Foremost’ effectively sets aside
all other provisions of Constitution that do not show a connection to this
root. One has to become a Buddhist Politician in mind to know this root. When
such politician is at the root – there is no place for Buddha who renounced
position benefits to discover the Truth at grassroots level.
Democracy in Administration is ‘foreign’ language to
those who have the autocratic genes. I resigned from my UNSW position after
hearing Ms Pauline Hanson in August 1998 say to us migrants who did not want to
‘assimilate’ with majority – to go back home. But the true Australians who were
also suffering due to ‘foreign laws’ asked me to stay and I forewent the bigger
opportunity to stay within their boundaries. Hence when I went to prison for ‘Peaceful
Assembly’ I facilitated the Truth of the University to surface Itself – i.e. –
that the University was so disorderly that it would threaten through armed
forces rather than use the intellectual pathway to uphold its own Truth.
Yesterday Ms Hanson was in hot waters again for claiming
that children with disabilities should have separate classrooms. One who was
hurt by her observations in 1998 – that migrants who do not assimilate must go
back home – would not be surprised by the above expressions. It’s all about
separation so Ms. Hanson would mark herself ‘right’ as per the locals in her
group who are yet to release themselves from the White Australia policy which
was ‘right’ for the government of that time. Ms Hanson like the above lawyer
was being true to her part of Australian
society. Like the more educated Sinhalese in Sri Lankan society who were hurt
by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, White
Australians who have invested in global principles and values, are getting
upset now for the same nature surfacing again – this time to damage their own
investments. If Ms Hanson had been disciplined
back then by using Global principles that Australian Government has foremost
commitment to – Australians would have been saved the pain and anxiety of
Terrorism. The prevention Energy is within the control of migrants who have
natural authority over their juniors who seek to exercise authority prematurely
through the use of the gun. So long as they feel Australian – Australians are protected
from such violence.
Given that Indigenous Australians have first authority
– those who share in their pain are higher in status than those who separate
them as untouchables.
We – each one of us develop our own natural
structures as we go through life. Every one of us has the Natural Authority to
enjoy ourselves and the benefits in our custody – so long as we have no
knowledge of anyone else being affected by it one way or the other. As they say
in the Indian system ‘it is an offence to give dowry or receive dowry’. In Sri
Lankan Tamil Thesawalamai – dowry has positive value and hence renders dignity
to the wife and her side of the larger family. Sri Lankan Tamils who are owners
of Sri Lankan Tamil tradition would not therefore easily assimilate with Indian
Tamils where the above law is relevant. Hence when the LTTE received money from
the then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister – they disconnected with all those who
practiced the dowry system. Sri Lankan Tamils have their own structures as per
their genuine investments in their local environments.
As per my knowledge of Hinduism – Matter is at the
bottom end of order and Energy is at the highest end. Matter is the vessel in
which the Energy is preserved. Land is one such vessel. Democracy in Politics is based Land and those to whom
that Land is home are relatives. Ms. Hanson has the authority to state in
Parliament only those values that directly affect the electorate that she
represents. Ms Hanson often behaves as if she is the Minister or Shadow
Minister who represents the issue on behalf of the whole of Australia. That is
the curse from indiscriminate use of majority power by producing more and more
opposition – without connection to personal belief.
As
per 9 News report :
[The One Nation leader made the
comments during debate on the federal government's proposed schools overhaul.
Ms Hanson insisted parents and
teachers had raised the matter with her.
Teachers were devoting much of
their time to disabled children, to the detriment of other students in the
classroom, she said.
Disabled and autistic children
should be taught in special classrooms where they can be looked after and given
special attention, she said.
"If it was one of my children
I would love all the time given to them to give them those opportunities - but
is it at the loss of our other kids?"]
The
above confession confirms that Ms Hanson did not feel the need of her
electorate but ‘heard’ those who lacked the courage to represent their beliefs
directly to the Government or through experts in the field. This demonstrates
that they want an easier time through smaller groups while others learn to ‘integrate’
by sacrificing easy time. It is the parallel of ‘Tamil Eelam’ and ‘Sinhala Only
/ Buddhism foremost’.
Like
Mr. Meehan said about himself – Ms Hanson ‘came back’ – as did Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa
as the Joint Opposition – i.e. De facto Opposition. Stayed too long with the
LTTE? Likewise, Ms Hanson who through her natural structure tries to be the ‘boss’
of those who seem lesser Australian than herself would merge naturally with
those less developed minds taking authority without belief. They are our
internal Terrorist – killing our global investments.
When we as leaders turn blind eye to such disorder within, it grows silently to become Negative value to our heirs and exposes Itself when those who represent those negative values are greater than the numbers who represent positive value. This often happens through passage of time when the younger generation is more global and/or immigration when the migrants’ inherited value is more positive.
The above lawyer’s mentors were Americans continuing
to carry the ‘invasion genes’. In contrast, the Vice Chancellor of UNSW who sent me to prison – also brought with
him the American mentality of treating Australians as juniors. He got dismissed
by the system of Natural Justice when I did not physically resist that
injustice. That was proof that I was deeper owner of University of NSW than the
American trained Vice Chancellor.
We are free only when we stay within our earned
structures. The rest – even if we are sent to prison belongs to those who
opposed us – each getting their return as per their own structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment