Gajalakshmi
Paramasivam
15 December 2016
Inherited
Separation Powers
‘However,
Jaya’s closest aide Sasi must produce a proof or a will duly signed by the
registered owner (Jayalalitha) which would officially declare Sasikala the
owner of the asset.’ - Who Will Inherit Jayalalithaa's Legacy of Wealth? –
by Meher Onisa
Today is the deadline for submissions in
relation to the Testamentary case regarding the Estate of my husband’s brother
Mr. Subramaniam Yoganathan of Vaddukoddai. Mr. Yoganathan was a bachelor. The
Testamentary case is between his siblings. In Court – the Petitioners are the
ones who physically lived with him. In the case of Madam Jayalalitha (the Chief
Minister of Tamil Nadu who passed away on 05 December, the parallel of the
Petitioners in our case, is her friend and caretaker Ms Sasikala. The force
that influences the Petitioners in our family matter is the Australian sister
who claimed in court that she was the caretaker of Mr. Yoganathan. I do not
know who the less visible force is in the case of Madam Jayalalitha’s Estate. But,
it is important to ensure that we accept only that which belongs to us – including
for the sake of all Nations concerned.
When I brought action in Supreme Court of
NSW against the Australian forces who directly or indirectly accused me of
playing the role of Ms Sasikala in the Chief Minister’s case, the Court claimed
that they did not have jurisdiction because the defamatory statements were made
in Sri Lanka. By ‘avoiding’ the responsibility, the Australian Judiciary
contributed to any negative forces being
carried within Australia. Yesterday, I quoted Dr. Nesiah as follows:
‘The
three fundamental common components of race and caste are heredity, hierarchy and endogamy. In a racist society your race is
determined by your ancestry and so too your place in the social hierarchy.
These are also features of a casteist society.’
I went on to state that about the above
three components ‘In terms of Judgment
they are Truth, Law and Facts’
When we draw up the picture of facts through common law – we get the common picture.
When we draw up the picture as per our own genuine expectations the picture
confirms our own laws which may or may not fit the common law. In our family matter the picture drawn up is
like the Sri Lankan war picture – with each side codifying as per their net investment
in Commonness. Where the net value is positive – that would fit well with the
Common Law. Where the net value is negative – that would cheat someone of their
dues from the common estate.
Like Madam Jayalalitha, the LTTE also
received funding from Mr. M.G.Ramachandran - actor turned politician. Mr. MGR
and Madam Jayalalitha were both popular Tamil film stars attracting strong
following amongst Sri Lankan Tamils also. Both left behind monies way above that
which is needed to maintain their heritage values. Relatively speaking Sri
Sathya Sai Baba left behind much less in money value than is needed to maintain the Heritage Values all
over the world, in the minds of Humans and as Spiritual Energy available to all
those in genuine need.
Truth as mentioned above is like a
catalyst. It does not directly participate to become part of the manifestation,
but it is there in every manifestation. Hence sacred or haunted places. When we bless or are being
blessed – the value shared is as per this Energy. When we ‘inherit’ we receive
a share of this Energy.
When MGR funded the LTTE, the LTTE
inherited also – the weaknesses in the way that money was received by the donor
– i.e. – the weaknesses in Tamil Nadu Politics. LTTE also left behind monies
that were way beyond those needed to service their heritage. Likewise, when the
LTTE received money from the former President to stop Tamils from voting in the
2005 Presidential elections. The way Rajiv Gandhi was killed by the LTTE the
LTTE leadership was killed by the former President who is also reported to have
amassed wealth through the political pathway. Their children / heirs would
inherit the Separation powers.
As per Wikipedia report, in relation to
this part of India’s Spiritual Guru of our times:
[On 2 September 2012, Satyajit Salian, a
close aide of Sri Sathya Sai Baba, released to the media a declaration made by
Sai Baba, and registered on 23 March 1967, in Bombay saying his relatives
had no authority over the Sathya Sai Trust assets. The exact text of the
declaration was:
I, Sri Sathya Sai of Parshanthi Nilayam P.O. Indian
Inhabitant hereby declare as follows:-
1) I was born in the village of Puthaparthi District
Anantpur and am at present 44 years old. I joined the school and gave up
studies and dedicated myself spread Sanatan Dharma. I am unmarried and I left
my parents house at the age of Twelve and have taken up religious order with
saffron dress and I have no worldly/or family attachments. I declare that when
I left parents' place permanently and adopted Holy order with no intention to
revert back. I relinquished all my right title and interest in the family
property moveable and/or immovable whatsoever and wherever they may be and that
I do not own and possess any personal property, wealth or estate. Whatever is
given to me by my devotees is under my management, supervision and control as a
Trustee to be used for public charitable purposes. This declaration I am making
so that nobody can claim under or through me in the family properties, if any.
Satyajit Sailan also attached the attestation of
Indulal Sha, who is the sole surviving witness to the original document.
Satyajit Sailan said he has been in possession of the document since 1998, per
the directions of Sai Baba. Officials from the Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust
stated to the media that they would respect this will]
The parallel of this in Hindu Philosophy is
reflected through Palani Murugan – Who also renounced His parental wealth and
set Himself up on Palani Hill. It is interesting to note the following account
in Wikipedia, confirming the negative Energy of Tamil Nadu Chief Ministers who
failed to separate their Cinema wealth from their Political wealth – the latter
belonging to the Common Public:
[The original idol of the presiding deity is believed
to have been made by Boga Siddhar using highly toxic herbs, which could kill
people with its very presence. Over the years, some believe that the idol has
been wearing away or dissolving, by virtue of its repeated anointment and
ritual bathing. However, long-time devotees and priests of the temple maintain
that they perceive no visible change. Since Hinduism forbids the worship of an
imperfect idol, suggestions have been made, at various points of time, to replace
it, cover it, or stop some of the rituals, which could have resulted in its
erosion. A new 100 kg idol was consecrated on 27 January 2004, but coming
under severe criticism from orthodox believers, was displaced and worship of
the existing idol restored, shortly thereafter. During the regime of M.G.
Ramachandran, the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu during
1984, attempts were made to replace the idol and also during the first tenure
of J. Jayalalithaa during 1994. Both the attempts
were withdrawn along with the latest attempt during 2002. ] Wikipedia
Buddhist Political Leaders seeking the
blessings of Lord Murugan would need to stay within their current earnings to
be blessed by Murugan. Those who activate the past victories – be it those of
Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa or King Dutugemunu would not connect to Lord Muruga
Energy – be It in Kathirgamam in South or Nallur in North.
No comments:
Post a Comment